Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Bern University of Applied Sciences | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
State-of-the-art myoelectric prostheses provide upper limb amputees with a remarkable variety of grip patterns but lack proper feedback from touch sensation. This restriction limits the controllability of multi-articulated robotic hands, resulting in the rejection of the device in many cases.
Amputees have often reminiscing sensations in the stump, i.e. by touching certain regions, it feels as if no longer existing fingers were touched. These regions form a phantom map and show promising results for touch feedback. However, not every amputee has one and the socket of a prosthesis offers limited space for additional devices. Thus, the investigators developed a feedback display which is worn in the shoe instead of the prosthesis itself. The investigators want to assess the viability of vibrotactile feedback stimulus on the foot as a substitution for pressure on the fingers of an artificial hand in a clinical study. The efforts are based on the hypothesis that a hand prosthesis with tactile feedback has better performance in manipulating fragile and heavy objects, compared with a standard commercial hand prosthesis without tactile feedback.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm amputees | Experimental | This single arm conducts all experiments. In three out of four experiments both interventions (with feedback & without feedback) are used, the fourth experiment does not allow the intervention without feedback. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FeetBack System Active | Device | Commercially available hand prosthesis with feedback device turned on |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Success rate | Success rate to detect the contact force levels to differentiate between different objects and to manipulate fragile objects, using a hand prosthesis with/without tactile feedback. | Through study completion, an average of 1 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time needed to finish tasks | Comparison of average time needed to finish a set of manipulation tasks, using a hand prosthesis with/without tactile feedback. | Through study completion, an average of 1 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Design acceptance | Design acceptance of the study devices by the subjects with a questionnaire (yes/no, scale, open questions) for further development | Up to 2 weeks after study completion |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Martin Berli, Dr. med. | Universitätsklinik Balgrist | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balgrist University Hospital | Zurich | 8008 | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36389246 | Derived | Morand R, Brusa T, Schnuriger N, Catanzaro S, Berli M, Koch VM. FeetBack-Redirecting touch sensation from a prosthetic hand to the human foot. Front Neurosci. 2022 Oct 26;16:1019880. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1019880. eCollection 2022. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The two interventions are commercially available myoelectric hand prostheses either with or without an additional feedback device.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| FeetBack System Passive | Device | Commercially available hand prosthesis with feedback device turned off |
|