A Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Study to Compare the Efficacy of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade at the End of Kidney Transplantation Surgery in Patients With Severe Kidney Dysfunction
A Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Study to Compare the Efficacy of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade at the End of Kidney Transplantation Surgery in Patients With Severe Kidney Dysfunction
The purpose of this study is to compare two medications that reverse muscle paralysis at the end of kidney transplant surgery with the goal of reducing residual muscle weakness and insufficient respiratory function after surgery.
This is a prospective randomized double-blind single center study on patients with severe kidney failure undergoing kidney transplantation surgery. Patients will have their muscles paralyzed during general anesthesia for surgery. At the end of surgery, muscle paralysis will be reversed with either neostigmine (control group) or sugammadex (intervention group). Residual muscle weakness and respiratory function will be monitored after surgery with a quantitative train-of-four (qTOF) monitor and a noninvasive continuous ventilation monitor. The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving sugammadex will have less residual muscle weakness and better respiratory function than patients receiving neostigmine. Respiratory and kidney function parameters and any adverse events will be collected during the hospital stay. Patients will contacted for a study follow up around 2 weeks after their surgery.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: