Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the present study is to determine if a standard humeral cut using a fixed neck shaft angled prosthesis for patients undergoing anatomic TSA is able to restore normal glenohumeral relationships as compared to a variable neck shaft angle prosthesis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anatomically-matched cut | Active Comparator |
| |
| Cutting guide | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anatomical cut | Procedure | Surgeon-derived cut based on patient's anatomy |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Radriographic measurements | x-rays will be measured by 3 independent surgeons to measure restoration to natural anatomy following total shoulder replacement | x-rays taken day of surgery |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rothman Institute | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Cutting guide |
| Procedure |
Angle cut at 132.5 degrees based on cutting guide |
|