Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Funding unavailable - Company shutting down
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study seeks to to determine the efficacy and side effect profile following radiation therapy for participants with the AeroForm device placed. The AeroForm device is FDA approved.
Primary objective:
To assess the proportion of successful initial phase of tissue expander/implant based breast reconstructions (no reconstruction failure or unexpected return to the operating room) following post-mastectomy radiation therapy in participants with AeroFormplaced.
Secondary objectives:
This is a phase II trial evaluating the use of the intervention in participants with breast cancer undergoing post-mastectomy radiation therapy in order to define the toxicity profile and associated subsequent successful surgical reconstruction rate
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| AirXpanders AeroFormtissue expander + Radiation therapy | Experimental | AirXpanders AeroFormtissue expander in participants with breast cancer undergoing post-mastectomy radiation therapy in order to define the toxicity profile and associated subsequent successful surgical reconstruction rate. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AirXpanders AeroFormtissue expander | Device | The AeroFormdevice will be placed in an immediate fashion at the time of mastectomy in a submuscular, prepectoral or dual-plane approach. The tissue expander will be minimally inflated intraoperatively to minimize dead space and while facilitating tension free closure. Participants will undergo standard postoperative management, and will be given instructions on utilization of the device, including daily expansion until desired volume is reached as determined b surgeon and participant agreement. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of successful reconstructions following radiation therapy | up to 6 months following permanent implant placement |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of implant success at 6months following replacement. | up to 6 months following permanent implant placement | |
| Rate of reconstruction revisions from Aeroform placement throughout study. | up to 6 months following permanent implant placement |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Female gender based on presentation of breast cancer
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Chirag Shah | The Cleveland Clinic | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Part of sponsored study, not planning to share IPD at this time.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Time to implant exchange from Aeroform placement. | up to 6 months following permanent implant placement |
| Time to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy following initial surgery (when applicable). | up to 6 months following permanent implant placement |
| Time to initiation of radiation therapy following initial surgery | up to 6 months following permanent implant placement |
| Cosmetic outcomes per the aesthetics scale | 13-question assessment with scores ranging from 13 - 65, higher scores indicating better aesthetics | up to 6 months following permanent implant placement |
| Quality of life based on the BREAST-Q scales | Full name BREAST-Q- Reconstruction Module version 2.0, higher is better outcome | up to 6 months following permanent implant placement |
| Quality of life based on the Breast satisfactions scales | Full name BREAST-Q- Reconstruction Module version 2.0, higher is better outcome | up to 6 months following permanent implant placement |
| Number of participants who experience acute toxicity per CTCAE version 4.0 | See AE/SAE section | up to 6 months following permanent implant placement |
| Chronic toxicity per CTCAE, Baker scoring | Full name CTCAE Toxicity/Baker Capsular Contracture, Higher- worse CTCAE and Baker | up to 6 months following permanent implant placement |
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |