Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Akamis Bio | INDUSTRY |
| Cancer Research UK | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The use of chemoradiotherapy (CRT), in combination with surgery is the standard of care in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. However some patients don't respond well to radiation.
More advanced radiotherapy techniques, that result in fewer toxicities, means that we are now able to combine new anti-cancer agents into standard treatment. Targeting the tumour early in this way has the potential to improve response rates.
Enadenotucirev is a specific type of anti-cancer virus that only targets cancer cells. It acts in the same way as any virus and can only survive by replicating inside cancer cells and not normal, non-cancerous cells. This means that it can selectively target and destroy tumours, without directly affecting normal cells. It also has the ability to attract cells from the body's immune system to help fight the cancer.
The addition of enadenotucirev to standard chemoradiotherapy treatment may have a combined effect on the cancer cells with potentially few, additional side effects.
This trial aims to determine the optimal dose and frequency of the virus to give by gradually increasing the number of doses each successive patient receives, and then increasing the dose of the virus itself. Each patient will receive a minimum of 3 doses, up to a maximum of 8, spread over the course of their 5 week standard chemoradiotherapy treatment. Patients will be closely monitored at all times to ensure that with each dosing group, there aren't excessive side effects.
Patients will then undergo surgery as part of their standard of care and be followed up for up to 4-6 weeks post-surgery.
This trial aims to determine the optimal dose and frequency that can then be used in future studies with the possibility of exploring the addition of Enadenotucirev to other chemoradiotherapy treatments.
At present identifying novel radiosensitising agents in colorectal cancer is an area of high need for patients considering sphincter preserving surgery or needing down staging to facilitate surgery.
Although the combination of Enadenotucirev with chemoradiation is novel, there is a wealth of evidence to support the rationale for combining this class of agent with radiation and chemotherapy.
Enadenotucirev is a group B oncolytic virus under development for the systemic treatment of metastatic or advanced epithelial tumours. Enadenotucirev is a chimeric adenovirus type 11p (Adp/adenovirus type 3 (Ad3) virus, discovered through a process of bio-selection from a library of chimeric viruses produced from a pool of adenoviruses from seven different serotypes utilizing human HT-29 colorectal cancer (CRC) cells.
Enadenotucirev shows selective and potent toxicity in humans carcinoma cells with only very limited or no toxicity to normal (non-cancerous) human cells. Other than humans, there is no known permissive species for Enadenotucirev. The principle advantage of oncolytic therapy is that the virus replicates only in diseased cells meaning that the concentration of drug is amplified at the site of pathology so that it is higher in the tumour than in healthy tissue. Virus particles spread from cell to cell within a tumour nodule until they reach non-permissive normal tissues, in principle destroying all viable tumour cells they encounter.
While the overall understanding of the mechanism of action of Enadenotucirev in humans is still under investigation, it is now well established from non-clinical and clinical studies that the mechanism of anti-cancer efficacy of oncolytic viruses not only involves direct infection and lysis of tumour cells, but that immune responses stimulated via an increased release of tumour-associated antigens and immune-inflammatory activation signals play a key role.
CEDAR is dual endpoint, dose escalation phase 1 trial using a time to event continual reassessment method (TiTE CRM). Response and Toxicity endpoints will be combined in dose escalation models to identify the optimal dose schedule. Dose decisions are made using the statistical model which uses number of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) experienced in different dosing schedules, instead of just using the data from that particular dose, as in the case of 3+3 model, meaning it uses all available data to make a dose decision.
This primary objective is to determine the optimal dose and frequency of the virus by firstly gradually increasing the number of doses each successive patient receives, and then increasing the dose of the virus itself. All participants will receive 3 loading doses in weeks 1-2, prior to initiation of standard chemoradiotherapy. Further doses of Enadenotucirev will either be given after or during and after standard chemoradiotherapy and this is dependent on which of the 4 different dose groups they are assigned to. The individual doses given will be either 1x10^12 viral particles (vp) or 3x10^12 vp.
Each patient will receive a minimum of 3 doses, up to a maximum of 8, spread over the course of 9 weeks. Patients will be closely monitored at all times to ensure that with each dosing group, there aren't excessive side effects.
Patients will then undergo surgery as part of their standard of care and be followed up for 4-6 weeks after surgery.
Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
DLTs are defined as any of the following occurring between the start of trial treatment until the Week 13 visit and assessed as possibly, probably or definitely related to enadenotucirev or the interaction between enadenotucirev and radiotherapy and/or capecitabine.
Renal:
o Development of proteinuria, 2+ as measured by urinalysis and confirmed with an albumin/creatinine ratio of >3g/mmol with a 24-hour urinary protein ≥1g/24h or if there is a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (where a decline in eGFR is defined as eGFR <60ml/min/1.73m2 or a drop in eGFR by 20% from screening, baseline of previous visit), following administration of enadenotucirev, shall be classified as a DLT. No further doses of enadenotucirev will be administered to that patient.
Acute hematologic toxicity:
Acute non-hematologic toxicity:
General:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dosing Group 1 | Experimental |
|
|
| Dosing Group 2 | Experimental |
|
|
| Dosing Group 3 | Experimental |
|
|
| Dosing Group 4 | Experimental |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enadenotucirev | Biological | Enadenotucirev is a live replicating oncolytic adenovirus; it is considered a BioSafety Level 1 (BSL-1) infectious substance. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Who Had a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Following Treatment With Enadenotucirev and Chemoradiotherapy (Capecitabine and Radiation) at 1 of 4 Different Dosing Schedules. | Dose escalation for this trial was informed by a Time To Event Continual Reassessment Method (TiTE CRM). This statistical model was also able to determine the optimal dose schedule of enadenotucirev that can be administered with chemoradiation (highest treatment schedule resulting in less than 30% dose limiting toxicity rate). The definition of a DLT for this trial can be found in the study description section of this record. | From Day 1 of treatment to Week 13 (13 weeks +/- 3 days) |
| Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Tumour Regression Grade on a Scale of 1-5 for Patients Treated With Enadenotucirev Delivered in Conjunction With Chemoradiotherapy (Capecitabine and Radiation) at 1 of 4 Different Dosing Schedules. | To inform the optimal dose and frequency of enadenotucirev that can be administered with chemoradiation. The MRI tumour regression grade uses the following scale and for the purposes of the trial analysis and dose escalation, scores of 1 or 2 were classified as responders and scores of 3, 4 or 5 were classified as non-responders:
| 13 weeks after starting treatment (+/- 3 days) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients Completing at Least 80% of the Intended Capecitabine Dose and at Least 20 Fractions of Radiotherapy. | Ability to deliver enadenotucirev concurrently with chemoradiation, based on treatment tolerance for the combination of enadenotucirev, capecitabine and radiation. | From start of treatment to end of treatment (9 weeks) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Histologically confirmed invasive adenocarcinoma of the rectum
Locally advance colorectal cancer as defined by pelvic MRI with a threatened circumferential resection margin (cT3mrf+ve), or inclusion of an adjacent organ, or low tumours at/below the level of the levators or enlarged pelvic side wall nodes or selected by the multidisciplinary team MDT for treatment with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, regardless of TNM classification
Patients with oligometastatic disease suitable for radical treatment are permitted provided that the site specific MDT deems them suitable for chemoradiation
Male or female, Age ≥ 18 years
ECOG performance score of 0 - 1
The patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol scheduled biopsy, follow-up visits and examinations for the duration of the trial.
Written (signed and dated) informed consent
Adequate renal function demonstrated by:
Adequate ≤1.5 ULN and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 mL/min/1.73m (measured creatinine clearance ≥60 mL/min) and
Urine dipstick for proteinuria at screening and baseline negative or trace. Patients may be included with results of 1+ if they have a spot urinary albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) of either:
(i) ≤3 mg/mmol or (ii) >3 mg/mmol with a 24 hour urinary protein <1.0 g/24 hours and
Serum complement C3 and C4 within the normal range
Haematological and Biochemical indices within the ranges shown below:
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnant or breast-feeding women, or women of childbearing potential unless effective methods of contraception are used.
Pulmonary lymphangitis (if metastatic disease present)
Past medical history:
Use of the following anti-viral agents: ribavirin, adefovir, lamivudine or cidofovir within 7 days prior to the first dose of trial treatment
Treatment with any other investigational agent, or participation in another interventional clinical trial within 28 days prior to enrolment. In follow up for an interventional trials and observational studies are allowed
History of DVT or pulmonary embolus in the 12 months before the first dose of study of study treatment
History of significant bleeding requiring hospitalisation in the 12 months before the first dose of study treatment
Patients receiving therapeutic or prophylactic anticoagulation therapy
Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) deficiency
Prior chemotherapy is allowed as long as >28 days since the last administration and any toxicity has resolved to NCI CTCAE grade 1 or less
Other psychological, social or medical condition, physical examination finding or a laboratory abnormality that the investigator considers would make the patient a poor trial candidate or could interfere with protocol compliance or the interpretation of trials results
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Maria Hawkins, MD FRCR MRCP | University of Oxford | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Velindre Cancer Centre | Cardiff | CF14 2TL | United Kingdom | |||
| Beatson West Of Scotland Cancer Centre |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32532291 | Derived | O'Cathail SM, Davis S, Holmes J, Brown R, Fisher K, Seymour L, Adams R, Good J, Sebag-Montefiore D, Maughan T, Hawkins MA. A phase 1 trial of the safety, tolerability and biological effects of intravenous Enadenotucirev, a novel oncolytic virus, in combination with chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (CEDAR). Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jun 12;15(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01593-5. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The first patient was registered on 29Jul2019 and the final study visit for the final patient was on 28Oct2022.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Dosing Group 1 |
|
| FG001 | Dosing Group 2 |
|
| FG002 | Dosing Group 3 |
|
| FG003 | Dosing Group 4 |
|
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Dosing group 4 was a planned schedule of treatment per protocol. However, the data collected during the trial, did not warrant escalation to this schedule, therefore there were no participants registered to this dosing group.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Dosing Group 1 |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants Who Had a Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Following Treatment With Enadenotucirev and Chemoradiotherapy (Capecitabine and Radiation) at 1 of 4 Different Dosing Schedules. | Dose escalation for this trial was informed by a Time To Event Continual Reassessment Method (TiTE CRM). This statistical model was also able to determine the optimal dose schedule of enadenotucirev that can be administered with chemoradiation (highest treatment schedule resulting in less than 30% dose limiting toxicity rate). The definition of a DLT for this trial can be found in the study description section of this record. | Dosing group 4 was a planned schedule of treatment per protocol. However, the data collected during the trial, did not warrant escalation to this schedule, therefore there were no participants registered to this dosing group. | Posted | Number | participants | From Day 1 of treatment to Week 13 (13 weeks +/- 3 days) |
|
Adverse events were monitored from the time patients consented to the trial until they completed their 4-6 weeks post-surgery visit (minimum duration 18 weeks).
Dosing group 4 was a planned schedule of treatment per protocol. However, the data collected during the trial, did not warrant escalation to this schedule, therefore there were no participants registered to this dosing group and thus, no patients were at risk in this group and adverse events were collected.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Dosing Group 1 |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CEDAR Trial Manager, Oncology Clinical Trials Office (OCTO) | University of Oxford | 01865 617085 | octo-CEDAR@oncology.ox.ac.uk |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | May 5, 2021 | May 21, 2024 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 4, 2021 | May 21, 2024 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012004 | Rectal Neoplasms |
| D000257 | Adenoviridae Infections |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000654204 | enadenotucirev |
| D000069287 | Capecitabine |
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003841 | Deoxycytidine |
| D003562 | Cytidine |
| D011741 | Pyrimidine Nucleosides |
| D011743 | Pyrimidines |
Not provided
Not provided
CEDAR is a dual escalation phase 1 trial using a TiTE CRM (Time To Event Continual Reassessment Method).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Chemotherapy: 900 mg/m2 capecitabine twice daily, Mon-Fri (on radiotherapy days) for 5 weeks, except on days patients received enadenotucirev.
Radiotherapy: 50 Gy in 25 fractions.
Enadenotucirev: 3 x loading doses pre-chemoradiation (low-high-high*). 2 x concurrent doses on week 1, days 1 and 5 of chemoradiation (high-high*). 3 x maintenance doses post-chemoradiation (low-high-high*).
|
| Capecitabine | Drug | Capecitabine is a chemotherapy drug licensed for use in rectal cancer, it is a non-cytotoxic pre-cursor of the cytotoxic 5-fluorouracil. Due to Capecitabine not being taken on Enadenotucirev dosing days it is considered an investigational medicinal product within this trial. |
|
| Radiotherapy | Radiation | 50 Gy/25# |
|
| Number of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) of Tumour Following Resection (Staged According to Royal College of Pathologists Guidelines). |
To measure local response rate to combined therapy following treatment with enadenotucirev, capecitabine and radiotherapy. Pathological complete response (pCR) was only observable in patients undergoing surgery. The final resected tumour was assessed by an experienced lower gastrointestinal pathologist and staged according to the Royal College of Pathologists recommended standard datasets as per standard of care. Pathological complete response (pCR) is staged as ypT0N0 - a complete regression of the primary tumour (ypT0), with concurrently no (residual) tumoral invasion of the lymph nodes (ypN0).This notation is part of the TNM staging system used in oncology, where "T" stands for the size and extent of the main tumour, and "N" describes the presence of cancer in nearby lymph nodes. |
| At 4-6 weeks post surgery (minimum 18 weeks after start of treatment) |
| Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) Score on a Scale of 0-100 Following Resection. | To measure local response rate to combined therapy following treatment with enadenotucirev, capecitabine and radiotherapy. The Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) score ranges from 0-100, where a higher score equates to a worse prognosis. The NAR score outperforms pathological complete response (pCR) at predicting disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in clinical trials using neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. It similarly performs well at predicting DFS and OS in trials using pre-op chemo and chemoradiotherapy. Ref: George TJ, Allegra CJ, Yothers G. Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) Score: a New Surrogate Endpoint in Rectal Cancer Clinical Trials. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2015;11(5):275-80. NAR = [5pN - 3(cT - pT) + 12]^2 / 9.61 Where: cT is an element of the set {1, 2, 3, 4}, pT is in {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}, pN is in {0, 1, 2}. cT clinical tumour stage, pT pathologic tumour stage, pN pathologic nodal stage | At 4-6 weeks post surgery (minimum 18 weeks after start of treatment) |
| Glasgow |
| G12 0YN |
| United Kingdom |
| The Churchill Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals Trust | Oxford | OX3 7LE | United Kingdom |
| Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust | Sutton | SM2 5PT | United Kingdom |
| BG001 |
| Dosing Group 2 |
|
| BG002 | Dosing Group 3 |
|
| BG003 | Dosing Group 4 |
|
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ECOG Performance Status | ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Performance Status assesses the functional status of a patient (ref: Oken MM, et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-655). All participants in the trial were assessed as ECOG status 0 or 1. 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light house work, office work | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
| OG001 | Dosing Group 2 |
|
| OG002 | Dosing Group 3 |
|
| OG003 | Dosing Group 4 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Tumour Regression Grade on a Scale of 1-5 for Patients Treated With Enadenotucirev Delivered in Conjunction With Chemoradiotherapy (Capecitabine and Radiation) at 1 of 4 Different Dosing Schedules. | To inform the optimal dose and frequency of enadenotucirev that can be administered with chemoradiation. The MRI tumour regression grade uses the following scale and for the purposes of the trial analysis and dose escalation, scores of 1 or 2 were classified as responders and scores of 3, 4 or 5 were classified as non-responders:
| Dosing group 4 was a planned schedule of treatment per protocol. However, the data collected during the trial, did not warrant escalation to this schedule, therefore there were no participants registered to this dosing group. | Posted | Number | participants | 13 weeks after starting treatment (+/- 3 days) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Patients Completing at Least 80% of the Intended Capecitabine Dose and at Least 20 Fractions of Radiotherapy. | Ability to deliver enadenotucirev concurrently with chemoradiation, based on treatment tolerance for the combination of enadenotucirev, capecitabine and radiation. | Dosing group 4 was a planned schedule of treatment per protocol. However, the data collected during the trial, did not warrant escalation to this schedule, therefore there were no participants registered to this dosing group. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From start of treatment to end of treatment (9 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Pathological Complete Response (pCR) of Tumour Following Resection (Staged According to Royal College of Pathologists Guidelines). | To measure local response rate to combined therapy following treatment with enadenotucirev, capecitabine and radiotherapy. Pathological complete response (pCR) was only observable in patients undergoing surgery. The final resected tumour was assessed by an experienced lower gastrointestinal pathologist and staged according to the Royal College of Pathologists recommended standard datasets as per standard of care. Pathological complete response (pCR) is staged as ypT0N0 - a complete regression of the primary tumour (ypT0), with concurrently no (residual) tumoral invasion of the lymph nodes (ypN0).This notation is part of the TNM staging system used in oncology, where "T" stands for the size and extent of the main tumour, and "N" describes the presence of cancer in nearby lymph nodes. | Dosing group 4 was a planned schedule of treatment per protocol. However, the data collected during the trial, did not warrant escalation to this schedule, therefore there were no participants registered to this dosing group. In addition, there were 2 participants in dosing group 2 and 2 participants in dosing group 3 who did not have surgery, and therefore were not included in this analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At 4-6 weeks post surgery (minimum 18 weeks after start of treatment) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) Score on a Scale of 0-100 Following Resection. | To measure local response rate to combined therapy following treatment with enadenotucirev, capecitabine and radiotherapy. The Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) score ranges from 0-100, where a higher score equates to a worse prognosis. The NAR score outperforms pathological complete response (pCR) at predicting disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in clinical trials using neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. It similarly performs well at predicting DFS and OS in trials using pre-op chemo and chemoradiotherapy. Ref: George TJ, Allegra CJ, Yothers G. Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) Score: a New Surrogate Endpoint in Rectal Cancer Clinical Trials. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2015;11(5):275-80. NAR = [5pN - 3(cT - pT) + 12]^2 / 9.61 Where: cT is an element of the set {1, 2, 3, 4}, pT is in {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}, pN is in {0, 1, 2}. cT clinical tumour stage, pT pathologic tumour stage, pN pathologic nodal stage | Dosing group 4 was a planned schedule of treatment per protocol. However, the data collected during the trial, did not warrant escalation to this schedule, therefore there were no participants registered to this dosing group. In addition, there were 2 participants in dosing group 2 and 2 participants in dosing group 3 who did not have surgery, and therefore were not included in this analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) score | At 4-6 weeks post surgery (minimum 18 weeks after start of treatment) |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 2 |
| 0 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| EG001 | Dosing Group 2 |
| 0 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| EG002 | Dosing Group 3 |
| 1 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| EG003 | Dosing Group 4 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Peripheral swelling | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest discomfort | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Radiation skin injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Balanoposthitis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysphonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Flushing | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anal pruritus | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anorectal discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Faeces soft | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Proctalgia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Proctitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rectal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rectal tenesmus | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chills | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza like illness | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripheral swelling | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cystitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cystitis radiation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin abrasion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Activated partial thromboplastin time prolonged | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| SARS-CoV-2 test positive | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypomagnesaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Polydipsia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lethargy | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neuropathy peripheral | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sciatica | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tension | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysuria | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Micturition urgency | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Polyuria | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysparaeunia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pelvic pain | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Testicular pain | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin exfoliation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin irritation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hot flush | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripheral coldness | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
| D004266 | DNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D006573 |
| Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D005472 | Fluorouracil |
| D014498 | Uracil |
| D011744 | Pyrimidinones |
| D003853 | Deoxyribonucleosides |
| D009705 | Nucleosides |
| D009706 | Nucleic Acids, Nucleotides, and Nucleosides |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| Male |
|
| ECOG performance status = 1 |
|
|
| 3 - Fibrosis predominates but obvious measurable areas of tumour signal visible |
|
| 4 - Tumour signal predominates with little/minimal fibrosis |
|
| 5 - Tumour signal only: no fibrosis, includes progression of tumour (worst outcome) |
|
|
|