Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to assess the effectivity of adductor canal block performed the day after total knee arthroplasty surgery in reducing pain and improving walking ambulation ability and muscle strength.
Overview: total knee arthroplasty is a painful procedure. According to our institutional pain registers the worst pain appears in postoperative day one, which could be related to the use of effective but short analgesic intraoperative techniques like periarticular local analgesic infiltration and intravenous multimodal analgesia.
The aim: to asses if adductor canal block performed the day after primary total knee arthroplasty (16-20 hours postoperative) improves analgesia without motor blockade and impairment of early ambulation ability.
Primary Hypothesis: adductor canal block performed 16-20 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty improves postoperative analgesia.
Secondary Hypothesis: adductor canal block performed 16-20 hours after primary total knee arthroplasty improves ability of early ambulation, adductor and quadriceps strength after primary total knee arthroplasty.
The objectives:
Methods:
The prospective, double-blinded study includes American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III in preoperative assessment, aged 18-85 years, admitted for primary total knee arthroplasty. Preoperatively a simple randomization is made to distribute the included patients in two groups: Standard Group and Intervention Group. A table of random numbers is used, first selecting the starting point and later the movement direction remains constant throughout the whole table. The even numbers are allocated in the Standard Group and the odd ones in the Intervention group. The anesthesiologist performing the block will be aware of the treatment, but the participant subject and outcomes assessor will be blinded to the group assignment.
During the perioperative period all patients from both groups will receive a standardized anesthetic and analgesic treatment: premedication with midazolam 2.5-5 mg and dexamethasone 0'1 mg/kg, spinal anesthesia with 10mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine and intravenous propofol during the surgery for sedation. As analgesia paracetamol 1gr plus dexketoprofen 50 mg. The local infiltration analgesia will be performed in a protocolized manner during the surgery with ropivacaine 0'2% 120 cc mixed with 0'6 mg adrenaline and at the end of surgery with ropivacaine 0'2% 40cc for subcutaneous infiltration. Two doses of 0'1mg/kg tranexamic acid are administrated unless contraindication, first one 30 min before skin incision and second one three hours later.
Postoperative analgesia will be administrated to both groups of patients with ibuprofen 600 mg/8h and paracetamol 1gr/6h. Opioids will be available to patients as intravenous boluses of tramadol 1mg/kg if pain numerical rate score (NRS) > 3 at rest or > 5 at movement.
All patients included in the study are transferred to post-anesthesia reanimation unit 16-20h after surgery, in postoperative day one. The operated extremity is slightly externally rotated and prepared for the block with 2% chlorhexidine and sterile dressing and the adductor canal is identified with ultrasound image at the mid-thigh level. In standard group patients a sham adductor canal block with 2ml of 1% subcutaneous lidocaine is done. In intervention group patients an adductor canal block with a 22 Gauge ultrasound-visible needle and 20 ml of 0'5% ropivacaine is done. At the end all patients have a sterile apposite on the puncture site.
Postoperative pain will be assessed 15 minutes before the procedure (adductor or sham block), 2 hour, 24 hour post and also in the three nursing rounds (morning, afternoon, night) the first 72 hours after surgery. The pain numeric rating scale (NRS) is used (from 0 - no pain to 10 - worst imaginable pain) at rest and during active knee flexion. The requirement of additional opioids and their side effects (if any) will be recorded.
Knee extensor and adductor muscle strength is measured using a hand-held dynamometer (Baseline Digital Hydraulic Push Pull Dynamometer R)) immediately prior to surgery, in first postoperative, day immediately before the procedure, 2 hours and 24 hour postprocedure.
Patients ability of early ambulation is evaluated using ten meter walk test (TMWT) in the first and second postoperative day every 12h.
The success rate of the block is assessed by testing for sensation of cold and pinprick stimulus at the medial midcalf using a 3-point scale (2 = normal sensation, 1 = decreased sensation, 0 = no sensation) 2 hours after block.
The length of hospital stay and rate of complications (if any), will be recorded in both groups of patients. Complications will be graded as local complications (hematoma, wound complications…), block complications (falls, vascular injection…), urinary complications (acute urine retention, renal failure…) and general complications (neurological, respiratory, cardiological…).
According to study protocol, both groups of patients will be compared in terms of postoperative pain control, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting, quadriceps strength, adductor strength, ability of early ambulation, length of hospitalization and complications.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adductor Canal Block | Experimental | Patients will receive multi-modal analgesia (oral, intravenous and local infiltration anesthesia) for pain management following total knee arthroplasty and in the first postoperative day a single adductor canal block wiht 20cc of 0.5% Ropivacaine using ultrasound guidance . |
|
| Placebo Comparator | Placebo Comparator | Patients will receive multi-modal analgesia (oral, intravenous and local infiltration anesthesia) for pain management following total knee arthroplasty and in the first postoperative day a sham adductor canal block with 2ml of 1% subcutaneous lidocaine at the level of the adductor canal using ultrasound guidance. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single adductor canal block | Procedure | The operated leg is slightly externally rotated and prepared for a block with 2% chlorhexidine and sterile dressing. The adductor canal is identified using ultrasound image at the mid-thigh level and after a subcutaneous injection of 2 ml of 1% lidocaine a total of 20 ml of 0'5% ropivacaine is injected into the canal using a 22 gauge ultrasound-visible needle. In the end, a sterile apposite is placed at the puncture site |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in postoperative pain score at rest and knee flexion: Numerical Rating Scale | Assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 to 10 | Registered immediately prior to surgery, first postoperative day immediately prior to procedure, 2 hours postprocedure and every 8 hours the first three days in the orthopedic ward. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Knee extensor muscle strength | Measured using a hand-held dynamometer | Immediately prior to surgery, first postoperative day immediately before the intervention , 2 and 24 hours postintervention |
| Adductor muscle strength |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reis Drudis Morell, MD | Contact | 34630011138 | reisdrudis@gmail.com | |
| Jordi Colomina Morales, MD | Contact | 34 679513862 | jordicolomina82@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital Universitary Santa Maria | Recruiting | Lleida | 25198 | Spain |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16651569 | Background | Busch CA, Shore BJ, Bhandari R, Ganapathy S, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, McCalden RW. Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 May;88(5):959-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00344. | |
| 24939863 | Background | Andersen LO, Kehlet H. Analgesic efficacy of local infiltration analgesia in hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Sep;113(3):360-74. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu155. Epub 2014 Jun 17. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020370 | Osteoarthritis, Knee |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
A simple randomization is made to distribute the included patients in two groups: Standard Group and Intervention Group. A table of random numbers is used, first selecting the starting point and later the movement direction remains constant throughout the whole table. The even numbers are allocated in the standard group and the odd ones in the intervention group.
Not provided
Not provided
All patients included in the study are transferred the day after the total knee arthroplasty surgery to the postoperative resuscitation unit.
A sterile dressing of the lower extremity is performed and after the adductor canal is identified with ultrasound image, a medial leg puncture is done with or without doing the canal adductor block. At the end all patients have a sterile apposite on the puncture site.
All variables and outcomes are collected and registered by people not involved in the realization of the intervention.
|
| Simulated adductor canal block | Procedure | The operated leg is slightly externally rotated and prepared with 2% chlorhexidine and sterile dressing. The adductor canal is identified using ultrasound image at the mid-thigh level and at this leve a subcutaneous injection of 2 ml of 1% lidocaine . After, a sterile apposite is placed at the puncture site. |
|
Measured using a hand-held dynamometer
| Immediately prior to surgery, first postoperative day immediately before the intervention , 2 and 24 hours postintervention |
| Ability to walk with ten meter walk test | Measured with the ten meter walk test (TMWT) | First and second postoperative day every 12 hours |
| Rate of pain rescue treatments. | Rate of intravenous opioid needed by the patients. | First 72 hours following surgery |
| Rate of opioid side effects. | Rate of episodes of dizziness or nausea or vomit after opioid intake. | First 72 hours following surgery |
| Length of hospital stay | From date to operation until the data of discharge home, assessed up to 1 month |
| Rate of adductor canal block complications | Including: local swelling, hematoma, vascular or neurological lesion and falls. | First 72 hours following surgery |
| Rate of surgery local complications | Including, hematoma, wound infection, arthroplasty infection, vascular or neurological lesion. | From date to operation until the data of discharge home, assessed up to 1 month |
| Rate of medical complications | Including neurological, cardiological, urological and respiratory. | From date to operation until the data of discharge home, assessed up to 1 month |
| 24704172 | Background | Xu CP, Li X, Wang ZZ, Song JQ, Yu B. Efficacy and safety of single-dose local infiltration of analgesia in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee. 2014 Jun;21(3):636-46. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.02.024. Epub 2014 Mar 13. |
| 27028771 | Background | Sawhney M, Mehdian H, Kashin B, Ip G, Bent M, Choy J, McPherson M, Bowry R. Pain After Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Analgesic Effectiveness of a Combined Adductor Canal Peripheral Nerve Block with Periarticular Infiltration Versus Adductor Canal Nerve Block Alone Versus Periarticular Infiltration Alone. Anesth Analg. 2016 Jun;122(6):2040-6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001210. |
| 21598890 | Background | Fajardo M, Collins J, Landa J, Adler E, Meere P, Di Cesare PE. Effect of a perioperative intra-articular injection on pain control and early range of motion following bilateral TKA. Orthopedics. 2011 May 18;34(5):354. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110317-11. |
| 22221014 | Background | Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4. |
| 22834681 | Background | Jaeger P, Grevstad U, Henningsen MH, Gottschau B, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor-canal-blockade on established, severe post-operative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Sep;56(8):1013-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02737.x. Epub 2012 Jul 26. |
| 23222363 | Background | Andersen HL, Gyrn J, Moller L, Christensen B, Zaric D. Continuous saphenous nerve block as supplement to single-dose local infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):106-11. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31827900a9. |
| 25386752 | Background | Jaeger P, Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Schroder HM, Mathiesen O, Henningsen MH, Lund J, Jenstrup MT, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block for postoperative pain treatment after revision knee arthroplasty: a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study. PLoS One. 2014 Nov 11;9(11):e111951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111951. eCollection 2014. |
| 24842182 | Background | Hanson NA, Allen CJ, Hostetter LS, Nagy R, Derby RE, Slee AE, Arslan A, Auyong DB. Continuous ultrasound-guided adductor canal block for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind trial. Anesth Analg. 2014 Jun;118(6):1370-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000197. |
| 27212592 | Background | Kuang MJ, Xu LY, Ma JX, Wang Y, Zhao J, Lu B, Ma XL. Adductor canal block versus continuous femoral nerve block in primary total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2016 Jul;31:17-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.036. Epub 2016 May 19. |
| 24401802 | Background | Grevstad U, Mathiesen O, Lind T, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor canal block on pain in patients with severe pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study with individual patient analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2014 May;112(5):912-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet441. Epub 2014 Jan 8. |
| 23241723 | Background | Jaeger P, Nielsen ZJ, Henningsen MH, Hilsted KL, Mathiesen O, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):409-15. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318279fa0b. |
| 23788068 | Background | Kwofie MK, Shastri UD, Gadsden JC, Sinha SK, Abrams JH, Xu D, Salviz EA. The effects of ultrasound-guided adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength and fall risk: a blinded, randomized trial of volunteers. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;38(4):321-5. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318295df80. |
| 27015172 | Background | Dong CC, Dong SL, He FC. Comparison of Adductor Canal Block and Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(12):e2983. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002983. |
| 27035459 | Background | Hussain N, Ferreri TG, Prusick PJ, Banfield L, Long B, Prusick VR, Bhandari M. Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis: What Does the Evidence Suggest? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 May-Jun;41(3):314-20. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000376. No abstract available. |
| 26452678 | Background | Li D, Yang Z, Xie X, Zhao J, Kang P. Adductor canal block provides better performance after total knee arthroplasty compared with femoral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2016 May;40(5):925-33. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2998-x. Epub 2015 Oct 10. |
| 27871547 | Background | Vora MU, Nicholas TA, Kassel CA, Grant SA. Adductor canal block for knee surgical procedures: review article. J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:295-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.021. Epub 2016 Oct 11. |
| 28033266 | Background | Ma J, Gao F, Sun W, Guo W, Li Z, Wang W. Combined adductor canal block with periarticular infiltration versus periarticular infiltration for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Dec;95(52):e5701. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005701. |
| D012216 |
| Rheumatic Diseases |