Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Introduction: Low back pain is a very prevalent condition in the population and windsurf therapy has been presented as a non-pharmacological treatment currently used in this population. However, there is a lack of studies that evaluate such effects, besides a standardization of application of the technique in this condition. This protocol describes a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study that aims to assess the effectiveness of windsurf therapy in improving pain and other symptoms of individuals with chronic non-specific back pain. Methods: Ninety individuals with chronic nonspecific and localized chronic low back pain from 18 to 59 years, will be recruited according to the inclusion criteria. Afterwards they will be randomized to one of the 2 groups: intervention group (GI) where it will be submitted applied to the windspiration with 2 suctions; and placebo group (GP) with simulated application. Both applications will occur in parallel to the vertebrae from L1 to L5 bilaterally. The application will be performed once a week for eight weeks. The volunteers will be evaluated before treatment (T0), immediately after the first intervention (T1), 4 weeks after treatment (T4) and 8 weeks after treatment (T8). The primary endpoint will be pain, and the secondary ones will be kinesiophobia, physical function, lumbar range of motion, sleep quality, patient expectation, quality of life, and psychological factors. Discussion: This is the first protocol that proposes to evaluate the effect of windsotherapy on lumbar ROM, sleep quality, kinesiophobia and psychological problems. Few studies have been done on windsurfing individuals with low back pain, requiring further studies with good methodological quality. Because there is no consensus on the use of windsurf therapy in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain, our protocol will be the basis for the use of the technique by health professionals and for new studies to be performed.
This study will involve 4 researchers; 1 researcher responsible for evaluations; 1 researcher responsible for interventions; 1 researcher responsible for the interview, initial screening and randomization of participants, and 1 researcher who will perform the statistical analysis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cupping therapy with 2 suctions | Experimental | Participants in the intervention group will receive the application of cupping therapy with two acrylic type 1 cups with a distance of 3 cm each cup, parallel to the L1 to L5 vertebrae bilaterally. This group will consist of the application of windsheets with 2 suctions for 10 minutes, once a week, for 10 weeks. The cups shall be secured by means of elastic bands. |
|
| Cupping Therapy sham | Placebo Comparator | The placebo group will receive the application of cupping therapy with 2 cups of acrylic type size 1 with a distance of 3 cm each cup, parallel to the vertebrae L1 to L5, bilaterally . This group will consist of applying the sham winds for 10 minutes, once a week for 10 weeks. However, the cups will be made with small holes <2 mm in diameter to release the negative pressure in seconds. The cups will also be fixed by means of elastic bands. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cupping Therapy | Other | application of cupping therapy with two acrylic type 1 cups (4.5 cm internal diameter, Dong Yang ® brand) with a distance of 3 cm each cup, parallel to the L1 to L5 vertebrae bilaterally |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of Pain | The patients are asked to circle the number between 0 and 10. Zero usually represents 'no pain at all' whereas the upper limit represents 'the worst pain ever possible' | T0 -baseline, T4 (four week) and T8 (eight week) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) | will be used to analyze the quality of life in people with low back pain. This instrument contains in 10 items that assess the impact of low back pain on several functional activities. Values range from 0 to 5, the highest value indicating greater disability. The end result is the sum of all items. | T0 -baseline and T8 (eight week) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Cardoso De Souza, PT,PhD | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcelo Souza | Santa Cruz | Rio Grande do Norte | 59200-000 | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28946531 | Background | Wang YT, Qi Y, Tang FY, Li FM, Li QH, Xu CP, Xie GP, Sun HT. The effect of cupping therapy for low back pain: A meta-analysis based on existing randomized controlled trials. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Nov 6;30(6):1187-1195. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169736. | |
| 30462793 | Result | Moura CC, Chaves ECL, Cardoso ACLR, Nogueira DA, Correa HP, Chianca TCM. Cupping therapy and chronic back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2018 Nov 14;26:e3094. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2888.3094. |
Not provided
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study Protocol | View IPD |
there isn't a plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000079742 | Cupping Therapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000529 | Complementary Therapies |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Range of motion of the lower back (ROM) | Will be evaluated through the finger-to-floor test. This test presents high reliability and can be used for clinical practice and scientific studies. | T0 -baseline, T4 (four week) and T8 (eight week) |
| Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) | Quality of life will be assessed by the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. The instrument consists of 36 questions and assesses eight different domains that influence quality of life, considering the individual's perception of their health aspects in the last four weeks. Each item has a group of answers distributed on a Likert-graded scale, and the following dimensions were evaluated: physical function, physical aspect, pain, general health, vitality, social function, emotional aspect and mental health. Your total score ranges from 0 to 100, where the higher the value, the better quality of life score. | T0 -baseline and T8 (eight week) |
| Timed Up and Go Test (TUG): | This is a functional test which quantifies the mobility of an individual in seconds through the time in which they perform the task, i.e. in how many seconds can they lift themselves from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, return to the chair, and sit down again. The test has already been used in individuals to assess function in individuals with low back pain. The shorter the time taken to perform a task, the better the individual's ability to perform. | T0 -baseline and T8 (eight week) |
| Global Perceived Effect Scale (GPE) | Is a direct scale about the patient's self-perception when the intervention is performed.The GPE evaluates using 11 points, starting from a negative 5 (much worse than when starting the treatment), a neutral rating of 0, and 5 is positive (much improvement from starting the treatment). The Portuguese version will be used. The GPE evaluates using 11 points, starting from a negative 5 (much worse than when starting the treatment), a neutral rating of 0, and 5 is positive (much improvement from starting the treatment) . | T8 (eight week) |
| Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | A questionnaire which has also been validated and translated into Portuguese. This scale has 14 items, 7 for anxiety subscale and 7 for depression. For each item there is a score of 0 to 3, with a total of 21 points for the scale. | T0 -baseline and T8 (eight week) |
| Medication consumption | Patients will be given a daily control list of medication use to mark the amount of their use for low back pain during the study period. | T8 (eight week) |
| 33757719 | Derived | Almeida Silva HJ, Barbosa GM, Scattone Silva R, Saragiotto BT, Oliveira JMP, Pinheiro YT, Lins CAA, de Souza MC. Dry cupping therapy is not superior to sham cupping to improve clinical outcomes in people with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2021 Apr;67(2):132-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Mar 20. |
| 31871257 | Derived | Silva HJA, Saragiotto BT, Silva RS, Lins CAA, de Souza MC. Dry cupping in the treatment of individuals with non-specific chronic low back pain: a protocol for a placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind study. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 22;9(12):e032416. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032416. |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |