Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
•The Pilot study will involve current Marquette Method users who own and use a ClearBlue Fertility monitor and who will be asked to simultaneously use the Mira monitor for the sake of comparing the two devices to monitor the menstrual cycle.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single cohort | Experimental | All 20 participants will use ClearBlue and Mira monitors on first morning urine |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mira monitor comparison to ClearBlue monitor | Device | Testing first morning urine with hormone test sticks at home |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Day of the estimated beginning of the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle: | First day of the estimated fertile phase as measured by Clearblue Fertility Monitor First day of the estimated fertile phase as measured by the MIRA Fertility Monitor | 3 months |
| Day of the estimated peak of the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle: | Peak day of the estimated fertile phase as measured by the Clearblue Fertility Monitor Peak day of the estimated fertile phase as measured by the MIRA Fertility Monitor | 3 months |
| Day of the estimated end of the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle: | Last day of the estimated fertile phase as measured by the Clearblue Fertility Monitor Last day of the estimated fertile phase as measured by the MIRA Fertility Monitor | 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction and Ease of Use of a Electronic Fertility Monitor: | Measured by the modified 8 item Severy Satisfaction Scale Total score rages from 8 - 24 with 24 being the highest satisfaction | 3 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• Menstrual cycle ranging between 21-42 days
Exclusion Criteria:
• Not currently on medications that affect ovulation and 3 months prior
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deer Valley family Medicine Clinic | Calgary | Alberta | T2J6W5 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29376054 | Background | Bouchard TP, Fehring RJ, Schneider MM. Achieving Pregnancy Using Primary Care Interventions to Identify the Fertile Window. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 Jan 9;4:250. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00250. eCollection 2017. | |
| 28579410 | Result | Ecochard R, Bouchard T, Leiva R, Abdulla S, Dupuis O, Duterque O, Garmier Billard M, Boehringer H, Genolini C. Characterization of hormonal profiles during the luteal phase in regularly menstruating women. Fertil Steril. 2017 Jul;108(1):175-182.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Jun 1. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Official product website | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective cohort analysis of three menstrual cycles of hormone data, comparing two fertility monitors that analyze urine hormones. Satisfaction and ease of use will be assessed using surveys. Individual data will be anonymized.
Not provided
Not provided
Anonymized demographic data
Not provided
| 29234665 | Result | Leiva RA, Bouchard TP, Abdullah SH, Ecochard R. Urinary Luteinizing Hormone Tests: Which Concentration Threshold Best Predicts Ovulation? Front Public Health. 2017 Nov 28;5:320. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00320. eCollection 2017. |
| 22999798 | Result | Direito A, Bailly S, Mariani A, Ecochard R. Relationships between the luteinizing hormone surge and other characteristics of the menstrual cycle in normally ovulating women. Fertil Steril. 2013 Jan;99(1):279-285.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.047. Epub 2012 Sep 19. |
| 16371298 | Result | Severy LJ, Robinson J, Findley-Klein C, McNulty J. Acceptability of a home monitor used to aid in conception: psychosocial factors and couple dynamics. Contraception. 2006 Jan;73(1):65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2005.07.008. Epub 2005 Sep 19. |