Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego | OTHER |
| Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati | OTHER |
| MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL | OTHER |
| University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The Genomic Medicine for Ill Neonates and Infants (The GEMINI Study) is a research study aimed at comparing the clinical and economic utility of performing rapid whole genomic sequencing versus a targeted genomic sequencing panel on neonates and infants suspected of having a genetic disorder. This study is funded by the National Institutes of Health.
This multicenter, prospective clinical trial will enroll 400 subjects at the Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center (Boston, MA), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (Cincinnati, OH), Mount Sinai Kravis Children's Hospital (New York, NY), North Carolina Children's Hospital (Chapel Hill, NC), Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA), and Rady Children's Hospital (San Diego, CA).
This multicenter, prospective clinical trial will examine the diagnostic yield and clinical utility of NewbornDx, a targeted genomic sequencing panel for use in the neonate, and rapid whole genomic sequencing (rWGS) testing in high-risk infants with signs/symptoms consistent with a possible genetic disorder. Infants will undergo NewbornDx and rWGS (proband) testing. The biological parent(s), when available, will undergo NewbornDx testing at the same time as the infant. For rWGS,the infant will undergo testing first. If a specific diagnosis that is consistent with the phenotype is not made with rWGS proband analysis alone, the parent(s) will undergo rWGS. The study will also evaluate the cost effectiveness of each test as well as standard of care (SOC) testing. A retrospective chart review of infants with suspected genetic disorders will be done to understand 1-year cost and health outcomes that would have been incurred in the absence of the advanced testing. The resulting data from the trial will be used in the economic evaluation comparing NewbornDx, rWGS, and SOC over a 1-year period and used as basis to simulate the lifetime cost-effectiveness of these testing strategies. A web-based clinical reference database to provide references, clinical management guidelines, opportunities for clinical trial participation, and support groups for each condition will be developed with separate interfaces for the parent/guardian(s) and medical provider. The clinical reference database will be qualitatively assessed by a survey of medical providers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients receiving genetic testing in the NICU | Experimental | The study included 400 probands, 388 mothers, and 316 fathers who participated |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rapid whole genomic sequencing (rWGS) | Diagnostic Test | rWGS and NewbornDx are genomic sequencing platforms |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Number of Subjects With a Confirmed Genetic Disorder Detected by NewbornDx | If NewbornDx diagnoses a genetic disorder | 1-2 weeks |
| The Number of Subjects With a Confirmed Genetic Disorder Detected by rWGS | If rWGS diagnoses a genetic disorder | 1-2 weeks |
| Time in Hours to a Positive Result by NewbornDx | Duration of time (hours) to determine diagnosis by NewbornDx | 1-2 weeks |
| Time in Hours to a Positive Result by rWGS | Duration of time (hours) to determine diagnosis by rWGS | 1-2 weeks |
| Perception of the Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing | The Clinician Assessment of Clinical Utility assessed by physician survey using units on a likert scale with 1 meaning not useful at all and 5 meaning very useful. The Clinician Assessment of clinical utility was done collectively as a whole for both modes of genomic sequencing. | 1 week |
| Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing as Assessed by Changes in Clinical Care Management or Goals of Care | The Clinician Assessment of Clinical Utility assessed by physician survey selecting the specific types of 35 possible management changes (i.e. surgical intervention implemented, medication changed, etc.) The intent was to examine any changes in care resulting from completing either genomic sequencing testing. | 1 week |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| One Year Cost-effectiveness of Entire Cohort. | Total cost of hospitalization, post-discharge follow-up until infant's 1 year CGA (corrected gestational age). Cost effectiveness of the cohort was measured across both sequence groups as a single group. | From enrollment to 1 year corrected gestational age |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jill L Maron, MD, MPH | Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island | Principal Investigator |
| Jonathan M Davis, MD | Tufts Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rady Children's Hospital - San Diego | San Diego | California | 92123 | United States | ||
| Tufts Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37432431 | Result | Maron JL, Kingsmore S, Gelb BD, Vockley J, Wigby K, Bragg J, Stroustrup A, Poindexter B, Suhrie K, Kim JH, Diacovo T, Powell CM, Trembath A, Guidugli L, Ellsworth KA, Reed D, Kurfiss A, Breeze JL, Trinquart L, Davis JM. Rapid Whole-Genomic Sequencing and a Targeted Neonatal Gene Panel in Infants With a Suspected Genetic Disorder. JAMA. 2023 Jul 11;330(2):161-169. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.9350. | |
| 33587123 |
Not provided
Not provided
Sequencing data that relates genomic data to phenotype or other biological states will be generated and released in accordance to the NIH GDS Policy. Data, including genome sequences (fastq files), variants (vcf files), and associated HIPAA compliant clinical metadata will be deposited in the Longitudinal Pediatric Data Resource (LPDR; https://www.nbstrn.org/research-tools/longitudinal-pediatric-data-resource). The LPDR, in turn, will deposit data in the NCBI dbGAP. Variants with ACMG recommended pathogenicity assessments will be deposited in ClinVar. Novel disorder gene assertions will be deposited in ClinGen (https://clinicalgenome.org/).
Annual data submissions supplemented by specific dataset deposits as manuscripts arising from this work are submitted for publication.
Individual level data will be made available through controlled access. Genomic Summary Results will be made available through unrestricted access.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Patients Receiving Genetic Testing for the Study | The study included 400 probands, 388 mothers, and 316 fathers who participated. They all received both rapid whole genomic sequencing (rWGS) and the NewbornDx panel which are genomic sequencing platforms |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Patients Receiving Genetic Testing in the Study | The study included 400 probands, 388 mothers, and 316 fathers who participated rapid whole genomic sequencing (rWGS): rWGS and NewbornDx are genomic sequencing platforms |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | The Number of Subjects With a Confirmed Genetic Disorder Detected by NewbornDx | If NewbornDx diagnoses a genetic disorder | Pre-specified in the protocol to assess and collect as a single group across both sequence tests. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1-2 weeks |
|
|
1 year
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Full Cohort | Patients that underwent genetic testing with genomic sequencing and targeted neonatal gene sequencing test |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genomic testing results reporting | Investigations | Non-systematic Assessment | The reports were not sent encrypted to ensure confidentiality |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Jonathan Davis | Tufts Medical Center | 6176365322 | jdavis@tuftsmedicalcenter.org |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 5, 2019 | Nov 22, 2024 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| University of Pittsburgh | OTHER |
Single Group - All participants underwent both rGS and NewbornDx.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Boston |
| Massachusetts |
| 02111 |
| United States |
| Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | New York | New York | 10029 | United States |
| University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599 | United States |
| Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45229 | United States |
| University of Pittsburgh Medical Center | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| Result |
| Maron JL, Kingsmore SF, Wigby K, Chowdhury S, Dimmock D, Poindexter B, Suhrie K, Vockley J, Diacovo T, Gelb BD, Stroustrup A, Powell CM, Trembath A, Gallen M, Mullen TE, Tanpaiboon P, Reed D, Kurfiss A, Davis JM. Novel Variant Findings and Challenges Associated With the Clinical Integration of Genomic Testing: An Interim Report of the Genomic Medicine for Ill Neonates and Infants (GEMINI) Study. JAMA Pediatr. 2021 May 1;175(5):e205906. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5906. Epub 2021 May 3. |
| 41177396 | Derived | Lavelle TA, Maron JL, Kingsmore SF, Lin CH, Zhu Y, Sweigart B, Reed D, Gelb BD, Vockley J, Davis JM. Rapid Genome Sequencing Compared with a Gene Panel in Critically Ill Infants with a Suspected Genetic Disorder: An Economic Evaluation. J Pediatr. 2026 Feb;289:114889. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114889. Epub 2025 Nov 1. |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | days |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Diagnostic yield | The diagnostic yield for each group was calculated as percent that were positive for a pathogenic variant, likely pathogenic variant, or variant of uncertain significance (VUS). A VUS was only reported if it was present in a gene was located in or near a gene that was highly suspicious of causing the participant's phenotype. | Number | percentage |
|
|
| Primary | The Number of Subjects With a Confirmed Genetic Disorder Detected by rWGS | If rWGS diagnoses a genetic disorder | Pre-specified in the protocol to assess and collect as a single group across both sequence tests. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1-2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Time in Hours to a Positive Result by NewbornDx | Duration of time (hours) to determine diagnosis by NewbornDx | Pre-specified in the protocol to assess and collect as a single group across both sequence tests. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | hours | 1-2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Time in Hours to a Positive Result by rWGS | Duration of time (hours) to determine diagnosis by rWGS | Pre-specified in the protocol to assess and collect as a single group across both sequence tests. | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | hours | 1-2 weeks |
|
|
|
| Primary | Perception of the Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing | The Clinician Assessment of Clinical Utility assessed by physician survey using units on a likert scale with 1 meaning not useful at all and 5 meaning very useful. The Clinician Assessment of clinical utility was done collectively as a whole for both modes of genomic sequencing. | Physicians of record rated the overall utility of the genomic-sequencing process, based on collective results from both platforms using a 5-point Likert Scale (1, [not useful at all], to 5 [very useful]). Pre-specified in the protocol to assess and collect as a single group across both sequence tests. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1 week |
|
|
|
| Primary | Clinical Utility of Genomic Sequencing as Assessed by Changes in Clinical Care Management or Goals of Care | The Clinician Assessment of Clinical Utility assessed by physician survey selecting the specific types of 35 possible management changes (i.e. surgical intervention implemented, medication changed, etc.) The intent was to examine any changes in care resulting from completing either genomic sequencing testing. | Changes were determined via follow-up with the physician of record (intensivist or geneticist). Pre-specified in the protocol to assess and collect as a single group across both sequence tests. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1 week |
|
|
|
| Secondary | One Year Cost-effectiveness of Entire Cohort. | Total cost of hospitalization, post-discharge follow-up until infant's 1 year CGA (corrected gestational age). Cost effectiveness of the cohort was measured across both sequence groups as a single group. | A decision model simulated and compared total costs of rWGS from enrollment through 1 year corrected gestational age (study period) for: 1) early rGS, and 2) early NewbornDx followed by later rGS for undiagnosed infants. Model inputs included GEMINI data and 2023 Medicare rates; the primary outcome was total costs over the study period. Pre-specified in the protocol to assess and collect as a single group across both sequence tests. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | US dollars | From enrollment to 1 year corrected gestational age |
|
|
|
| 12 |
| 400 |
| 0 |
| 400 |
| 12 |
| 400 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Not very useful |
|
| Not useful at all |
|
| Withdrawal of life-sustaining support |
|
| Diet |
|
| Change in goal of care from comfort to cure |
|
| No changes in care |
|