Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Nottingham | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to (i) assess the effects of combined tDCS and cognitive training on decision-making on a trained task (Iowa Gambling Task; IGT); and (ii) test generalization to a closely related cognitive domain, namely motor impulsivity. It is hypothesized that combined anodal tDCS and cognitive training will result in more advantageous decisions and better impulse control than combined sham tDCS and cognitive training.
Impaired decision-making under conditions of uncertainty and risk has been implicated in maladaptive personality development and violent behaviour. There is a dearth of studies that examined the effects of combined tDCS and cognitive training on decision-making under conditions of uncertainty and risk. It is also unclear if these effects are generalizable to tasks in other domains such as response inhibition (motor impulsivity).
To examine these issues further, a single blind parallel arms randomized controlled trial will be conducted, involving a sample of healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 40. This will entail applying either active or sham tDCS over the anterior frontal cortex (including the vm-PFC) while participants undertake decision-making training using the Iowa Gambling Task. Decision-making will be assessed using the IGT, which is a computerized gambling task used to assess decision-making under conditions of uncertainty and risk. IGT is sensitive to damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), which is considered to play a key role in decision-making. Motor impulsivity will be measured using the Stop Signal Task (SST). The UPPS+P Impulsive Behaviour Scale will be used to index trait impulsivity. The Profile of Mood States will be used to measure state emotion before and after tDCS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined anodal tDCS and cognitive training | Experimental | Combined anodal tDCS and cognitive training. Anodal tDCS will be delivered while the participant is completing the cognitive training task (Iowa Gambling Task). Anodal tDCS will use a constant current of 2mA, delivered via gradual increase and decrease over 10 seconds at the onset and offset of stimulation (current ramps), respectively. The duration of each tDCS session will be 20 minutes. |
|
| Combined sham tDCS and cognitive training | Sham Comparator | Combined sham tDCS and cognitive training. Sham tDCS will be delivered while the participant is completing the cognitive training task (Iowa Gambling Task). For sham tDCS, the current will be delivered only in the first 10 seconds, after which the stimulation will cease but with the electrodes still in place throughout the session. The duration of each tDCS session will be 20 minutes. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anodal transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) | Other | Non-invasive brain stimulation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) net scores | IGT is a measure of decision making under conditions of uncertainty and risk. | Change from baseline after 20 minutes of combined cognitive training and tDCS stimulation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Stop Signal Task (SST) reaction time | SST is a measure of inhibitory control | Change from baseline after 20 minutes of combined cognitive training and tDCS stimulation |
| Urgency, Perseveration, Premeditation, Sensation Seeking + Positive Urgency (UPPS+P) Impulsive Behavior Scale total scores |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Najat Khalifa, MD, FRCPC | Contact | 6135444900 | nrk2@queensu.ca | |
| Tariq Hassan, FRCPSC | Contact | 6135444900 | hassant@providencecare.ca |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Najat Khalifa, MD | Queen's University - Canada | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Queen's University | Recruiting | Kingston | Ontario | K7L7X3 | Canada |
No participant data will be shared with researchers other than the study investigators.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 20, 2019 |
Not provided
Single blind Randomized Controlled Trial
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either combined anodal tDCS and cognitive training or combined sham tDCS and cognitive training. The participants will be blind to whether the tDCS is active or sham.
| Cognitive training | Behavioral | Iowa Gambling Task will be used for cognitive training |
|
| Sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) | Other | Non-invasive brain stimulation |
|
UPPS+P is a 59 item self-report measure of trait impulsivity. Each item is rated on a scale of 1-4 (1= totally disagree, 4=totally agree) yielding a total score out of 216 (range=59 - 216) Higher scores denote higher impulsivity. |
| Baseline |
| Abbreviated Profile of Mood States (POMS) Total Mood Disturbance score | Abbreviated POMS is a 40-item measure of current mood states. Each item is rated on a scale of 0-4 (0=Not at all, 4=Extremely). The total Mood Disturbance score is calculated by summing the totals for the negative subscales (tension, depression, anger, fatigue, confusion) and then subtracting the totals for the positive subscales (vigour, esteem related affect) and then adding a constant 100. Higher scores denote greater mood disturbance. | Baseline |
| Mar 20, 2019 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jan 20, 2019 | Mar 20, 2019 | ICF_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007175 | Impulsive Behavior |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D065908 | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation |
| D000091942 | Cognitive Training |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D003295 | Convulsive Therapy |
| D013000 | Psychiatric Somatic Therapies |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
| D004597 | Electroshock |
| D011580 | Psychological Techniques |
| D000066530 | Neurological Rehabilitation |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
| D005791 | Patient Care |
| D006296 | Health Services |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |
Not provided
Not provided