Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The enrolment phase was halted prematurely due to logistic issues ( SARS-CoV2 pandemic). All patients enrolled completed the follow-up visits according to the study protocol.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Multi-center, international, prospective, open-label, single-arm, first-in-human clinical investigation. The Patients enrolled in this clinical investigation will undergo a scheduled surgery for the treatment of long bone defects up to 6 cm using GreenBone Implant. After the surgery, the Patients will be monitored at pre-scheduled visits up to 12 months. Adverse events, pain, quality of life and functional parameters, as well as X-ray and CT scan, will be evaluated at scheduled follow-up visits. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will review the safety reports at regular intervals and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) as soon as reported, to protect Patients participating in the study. The initial phase of the study contemplates the treatment of bone defects up to 3 cm. An adaptive interim analysis will be performed when the first 7 Patients will have completed the 6-month follow-up visit. The DSMB will review the results of the interim analysis with respect to the primary endpoint (safety), and provide one of the following recommendations to the Sponsor: a) to stop the study for unacceptable frequency and severity of adverse events or b) to continue the study up to 25 Patients recruited and to include at least 5 Patients with a longer bone defect (> 3 cm up to 6 cm).
This is a pre-market multi-centre, international, open label, single-arm, study to evaluate the safety and performance of a Class III medical device (GreenBone Implant) for the treatment of long bone defect. Bone defects can result from malformation, high-energy traumatic events, bone resection due to different pathologies such as tumors or infections, or from the treatment of complex non-unions. Current treatment of bone defects usually implies the use of bone grafts and/or biocompatible materials, to create a scaffold that bridges the defect. Autograft and Allograft are the treatments most currently used for large bone loss, but both treatments have significant disadvantages. These types of treatment carry the risk of transferring disease from animals and/or humans to the patient; there is also a risk of host local allergic reaction. Bone substitutes are devoid of the above risks and therefore they could be used alternatively to xenografts and allografts. GreenBone is a ceramic resorbable bone scaffold that has very similar structure to bone. It can be produced in large quantities, shaped easily and sterilised without losing its properties. Consequently, it is an ideal substitute that could be used to fill bone defects. This study will assess the safety of using GreenBone treatment of long bone defects up to 6 cm. Moreover it will assess its capacity of promoting new bone formation. The investigators will recruit 25 patients with long bone defect and instead of bovine xenograft we will use the GreenBone implant for the long bone reconstruction. Patients will be followed up for 12 months in total.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Surgical repair of long bone defects | Experimental | The Patients in the study group will be surgically treated and the GreenBone Bone Substitute will be implanted |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| surgical repair of long bone defects | Device | Current treatment of bone defects usually implies the use of bone grafts and/or biocompatible materials, to create a scaffold that bridges the defect, favoring the migration of cells from the neighboring tissues to fill the gap. Autograft and Allograft are the treatments most currently used for large bone loss, but both treatments have significant disadvantages. Different types of synthetic materials have been tested for repair of long bone gaps. However, at the moment, there is not any bone substitute with the ideal/desirable osteoinductive, osteoconductive and mechanical properties. GreenBone Implant is a synthetic, acellular, reabsorbable, new generation bone graft, being suitable for surgical reconstruction of bone defects. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Evaluation of adverse events rate during the study period. | Overall study period up to 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Bone Union (Bone Healing) Evaluation Through Modified Lane and Sandhu Radiological Scoring System | Evaluation of the bone regeneration in the area of intervention in comparison to baseline (V1), by means of X-ray and/or CT scan examination, on visits V3, V4, V5, V6, V7 and V8. X-ray scoring systems have been implemented according to the criteria proposed by modified Lane and Sandhu Radiological Scoring System (Lane 1987). This scoring system evaluates bone formation and union. To evaluate the bone formation, there is a scale with 5 points, from 0 to 4 (0=No evidence of bone formation-4=Bone formation occupying 100% of defect). To evaluate bone union, there is a scale with 3 points, from 0 to 2 (0=Non-union-2=Radiographic union). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Please note: after interim analysis review by the DSMB, inclusion criteria n. 3 will be modified as follows (all Investigators will be notified by the Sponsor, and adequate training by Clinical Research Associate-CRA will be conducted):
Change of inclusion criteria n. 3: Patients requiring long bone defect reconstructions longer than 3 cm and up to 6 cm, resulting from high-energy traumatic events, or from the treatment of complex bone non-unions in the extremities (arms and legs), or patients undergoing the second stage of the Masquelet technique.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Peter Giannoudis, MD | Leeds Teaching Hospital NHS | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orthopedic and Traumatology Clinic, University Clinical Center of Republic of Srpska | Banja Luka | Republika Srpska | 78000 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Enrollment phase started in January 2019
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Surgical Repair of Long Bone Defects | The Patients in the study group will be surgically treated and the GreenBone Bone Substitute will be implanted surgical repair of long bone defects: Current treatment of bone defects usually implies the use of bone grafts and/or biocompatible materials, to create a scaffold that bridges the defect, favoring the migration of cells from the neighboring tissues to fill the gap. Autograft and Allograft are the treatments most currently used for large bone loss, but both treatments have significant disadvantages. Different types of synthetic materials have been tested for repair of long bone gaps. However, at the moment, there is not any bone substitute with the ideal/desirable osteoinductive, osteoconductive and mechanical properties. GreenBone Implant is a synthetic, acellular, reabsorbable, new generation bone graft, being suitable for surgical reconstruction of bone defects. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Only patients treated for bone defect repair were included in the analysis population (16 participants).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Surgical Repair of Long Bone Defects | The Patients in the study group will be surgically treated and the GreenBone Bone Substitute will be implanted surgical repair of long bone defects: Current treatment of bone defects usually implies the use of bone grafts and/or biocompatible materials, to create a scaffold that bridges the defect, favoring the migration of cells from the neighboring tissues to fill the gap. Autograft and Allograft are the treatments most currently used for large bone loss, but both treatments have significant disadvantages. Different types of synthetic materials have been tested for repair of long bone gaps. However, at the moment, there is not any bone substitute with the ideal/desirable osteoinductive, osteoconductive and mechanical properties. GreenBone Implant is a synthetic, acellular, reabsorbable, new generation bone graft, being suitable for surgical reconstruction of bone defects. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Only patients treated for bone defect repair were included in the analysis population (16 participants) |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Adverse Events | Evaluation of adverse events rate during the study period. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Overall study period up to 12 months |
|
1 year
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence, unintended disease or injury or any untoward clinical signs (including an abnormal laboratory finding) in subjects, users or other persons whether or not related to the investigational medical device.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Surgical Repair of Long Bone Defects | The Patients in the study group will be surgically treated and the GreenBone Bone Substitute will be implanted surgical repair of long bone defects: Current treatment of bone defects usually implies the use of bone grafts and/or biocompatible materials, to create a scaffold that bridges the defect, favoring the migration of cells from the neighboring tissues to fill the gap. Autograft and Allograft are the treatments most currently used for large bone loss, but both treatments have significant disadvantages. Different types of synthetic materials have been tested for repair of long bone gaps. However, at the moment, there is not any bone substitute with the ideal/desirable osteoinductive, osteoconductive and mechanical properties. GreenBone Implant is a synthetic, acellular, reabsorbable, new generation bone graft, being suitable for surgical reconstruction of bone defects. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixation system breakage | Surgical and medical procedures | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment | SAE not related to GreenBone implant. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allergic Reaction | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Clinical Affairs Manager | GreenBone Ortho SpA | +393479747691 | sonia.granados@greenbone.it |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 4, 2020 | Oct 11, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| At the end of visits 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 (respectively performed at screening and 1,2,3,6,9,12 months after the surgery, each visit is 1 day) |
| Bone Regeneration Evaluation Through Modified Lane and Sandhu Radiological Scoring System | Evaluation of the bone regeneration in the area of intervention in comparison to baseline (V1), by means of X-ray and/or CT scan examination, on visits V3, V4, V5, V6, V7 and V8. X-ray scoring systems have been implemented according to the criteria proposed by modified Lane and Sandhu Radiological Scoring System (Lane 1987). This scoring system evaluates bone formation and union. To evaluate the bone formation, there is a scale with 5 points, from 0 to 4 (0=No evidence of bone formation-4=Bone formation occupying 100% of defect). To evaluate bone union, there is a scale with 3 points, from 0 to 2 (0=Non-union-2=Radiographic union). | At the end of visits 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 (respectively performed at screening and 1,2,3,6,9,12 months after the surgery, each visit is 1 day) |
| Evaluation of Pain | Evaluation of degree of pain perceived by the Patient, by means of a Visual Analogue Score (VAS/0-10 point scale), on visits V1, V3, V4, V5, V6, V7 and V8. The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) that a scale with 10 points, from 0 to 10, 0 indicates "no pain at all" and 10 the "worst pain ever". | At the end of visits 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 (respectively performed at screening and 1,2,3,6,9,12 months after the surgery, each visit is 1 day) |
| Evaluation of Quality-of-Life | Evaluation of Quality-of-Life by means of EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L Validated Questionnaire, on visits V1, V3, V4, V5, V6, V7 and V8. The EQ-5D-5L is a descriptive system. This system comprises the same 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. | At the end of visits 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 (respectively performed at screening and 1,2,3,6,9,12 months after the surgery, each visit is 1 day) |
| Global Tolerability of Patient to Treatment | Evaluation of global tolerability to treatment of Patient (by the Investigator), through a standardized questionnaire, on visits V3, V4, V5, V6, V7 and V8. Global Tolerability Questionnaire is a questionnaire with 6 questions that are completed by the investigator in order to evaluate the operated site. | At the end of visits 3,4,5,6,7,8 (respectively performed 1,2,3,6,9,12 months after the surgery, each visit is 1 day) |
| Reinterventions Number | Evaluation of the number of re-interventions occurring for the Patient throughout the 12-month observation period. | between 1 and 12 months |
| Orthopedic Surgery Section, Division of Surgery,Rambam Health Care Campus | Haifa | 3109601 | Israel |
| UOC di Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Ospedali Civili di Brescia | Brescia | Lombardy | 25123 | Italy |
| Unitá Operativa di Traumatologia,Humanitas Research Hospital | Rozzano | Milano | 20089 | Italy |
| U.O.C. Ortopedia e Traumatologia - Osp. Maggiore "C.A. Pizzardi" | Bologna | 40133 | Italy |
| Orthopedic Surgery Section, Global Care Surgery Hospital | Novi Sad | 21000 | Serbia |
| Clinical Department for Traumatology,University Medical Center of Ljubljana | Ljubljana | SI-1000 | Slovenia |
| Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary | Leeds | LS13EX | United Kingdom |
| Count of Participants |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Only patients treated for bone defect repair were included in the analysis population (16 participants) | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Only patients treated for bone defect repair were included in the analysis population (16 participants) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Only patients treated for bone defect repair were included in the analysis population (16 participants) | Number | participants |
|
| Bone defect dimension | Treatment of bone defects up to 3 cm | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Bone Union (Bone Healing) Evaluation Through Modified Lane and Sandhu Radiological Scoring System | Evaluation of the bone regeneration in the area of intervention in comparison to baseline (V1), by means of X-ray and/or CT scan examination, on visits V3, V4, V5, V6, V7 and V8. X-ray scoring systems have been implemented according to the criteria proposed by modified Lane and Sandhu Radiological Scoring System (Lane 1987). This scoring system evaluates bone formation and union. To evaluate the bone formation, there is a scale with 5 points, from 0 to 4 (0=No evidence of bone formation-4=Bone formation occupying 100% of defect). To evaluate bone union, there is a scale with 3 points, from 0 to 2 (0=Non-union-2=Radiographic union). | Patients that achieved the complete follow-up up to 12 months (11 out of the 16 patients) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At the end of visits 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 (respectively performed at screening and 1,2,3,6,9,12 months after the surgery, each visit is 1 day) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Bone Regeneration Evaluation Through Modified Lane and Sandhu Radiological Scoring System | Evaluation of the bone regeneration in the area of intervention in comparison to baseline (V1), by means of X-ray and/or CT scan examination, on visits V3, V4, V5, V6, V7 and V8. X-ray scoring systems have been implemented according to the criteria proposed by modified Lane and Sandhu Radiological Scoring System (Lane 1987). This scoring system evaluates bone formation and union. To evaluate the bone formation, there is a scale with 5 points, from 0 to 4 (0=No evidence of bone formation-4=Bone formation occupying 100% of defect). To evaluate bone union, there is a scale with 3 points, from 0 to 2 (0=Non-union-2=Radiographic union). | Patients that achieved the complete follow-up up to 12 months (11 out of the 16 patients) | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | At the end of visits 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 (respectively performed at screening and 1,2,3,6,9,12 months after the surgery, each visit is 1 day) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluation of Pain | Evaluation of degree of pain perceived by the Patient, by means of a Visual Analogue Score (VAS/0-10 point scale), on visits V1, V3, V4, V5, V6, V7 and V8. The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) that a scale with 10 points, from 0 to 10, 0 indicates "no pain at all" and 10 the "worst pain ever". | Patients surgically treated with GreenBone Bone Substitute and that completed all follow-up visits | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | At the end of visits 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 (respectively performed at screening and 1,2,3,6,9,12 months after the surgery, each visit is 1 day) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Evaluation of Quality-of-Life | Evaluation of Quality-of-Life by means of EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L Validated Questionnaire, on visits V1, V3, V4, V5, V6, V7 and V8. The EQ-5D-5L is a descriptive system. This system comprises the same 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. | Not Posted | At the end of visits 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 (respectively performed at screening and 1,2,3,6,9,12 months after the surgery, each visit is 1 day) | Participants |
| Secondary | Global Tolerability of Patient to Treatment | Evaluation of global tolerability to treatment of Patient (by the Investigator), through a standardized questionnaire, on visits V3, V4, V5, V6, V7 and V8. Global Tolerability Questionnaire is a questionnaire with 6 questions that are completed by the investigator in order to evaluate the operated site. | Not Posted | At the end of visits 3,4,5,6,7,8 (respectively performed 1,2,3,6,9,12 months after the surgery, each visit is 1 day) | Participants |
| Secondary | Reinterventions Number | Evaluation of the number of re-interventions occurring for the Patient throughout the 12-month observation period. | Not Posted | between 1 and 12 months | Participants |
| 0 |
| 16 |
| 8 |
| 16 |
| 12 |
| 16 |
|
| Fracture non-union | Surgical and medical procedures | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Non-systematic Assessment | SAE not related to GreenBone implant. |
|
| Open reduction with external fixation | Surgical and medical procedures | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment | SAE not related to GreenBone implant. |
|
| Pseudarthrosis | Surgical and medical procedures | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Non-systematic Assessment | SAE not related to GreenBone implant. |
|
| Muscle abscess | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Non-systematic Assessment | SAE not related to GreenBone implant. |
|
| External fixator loosening | Surgical and medical procedures | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Wound dehiscence | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Itching | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Occasional serous drainage | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in leg or arm | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Joint instability | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Artery rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Presbyopia | Eye disorders | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rectal pain | Eye disorders | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin necrosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MEDDEV 2.7/3 rev. 3 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
|
| VAS score - visit 4 |
|
|
| VAS score - visit 5 |
|
|
| VAS score - visit 6 |
|
|
| VAS score - visit 7 |
|
|
| VAS score - visit 8 |
|
|