Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R44HL137447-01A1 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) | NIH |
| University of Nebraska | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Definity (perflutren lipid microspheres, Lantheus Medical Imaging) is an ultrasound contrast indicated for use in patients with suboptimal echocardiograms to opacify the left ventricular chamber and to improve the delineation of the left ventricular endocardial border. MVT-100 (the investigational pharmaceutical) is similar to Definity, with the exception of the removal of one lipid in the lipid blend and substitution of another lipid. This study is intended to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MVT-100 using a single ascending dose design in healthy volunteers. Patients are randomized to receive either MVT-100 or Definity and undergo echocardiograms after receiving either MVT-100 or Definity via bolus or IV infusion administration. The primary endpoints evaluated are safety and endocardial border delineation.
Ultrasound is one of the most common imaging examinations and has advantages of absence of ionizing radiation, portability and relatively low cost. Ultrasound contrast agents are used to improve the accuracy of ultrasound and Definity (perflutren) is the world's leading ultrasound contrast agent but perflutren has to be refrigerated and has a side effect of back pain. The investigators have developed a new, improved perflutren, MVT-100, with potential for room temperature storage.
Ultrasound contrast agents are used to increase the backscatter (signal intensity of blood vessels and tissues to improve diagnostic accuracy) of ultrasound imaging. In the US ultrasound contrast agents are FDA approved for echocardiography to improve endomyocardial border definition.
MVT-100 reflects the ultrasound to provide strong back-scattering. MVT-100 microbubbles resonate with ultrasound to provide strong harmonic signals. MVT-100 microbubbles will cavitate with higher levels of ultrasound and cavitation may be stable or inertial depending upon acoustic parameters and other factors.
The study is a multi centre ascending dose comparison of Definity and MVT-100 for use in echocardiography and will be performed in a sample of healthy volunteers who are randomized to receive either Definity or MVT-100.
This trial will assess safety and evaluate the following imaging metrics:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definity | Active Comparator | Each subject receives 100 uL x 2, 200 uL x 3, 300 uL x 2 or 1 vial of DEFINITY® 100 diluted in 50 mL of NS as follows: Two milliliter bolus over 10 seconds prior to each infusion rate;, then infusions will run for 5 minutes at 60 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 90 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 100 mL per hour and 5 minutes at 120 mL per hour. |
|
| MVT-100 | Experimental | Each subject receives 100 uL x 2, 200 uL x 3, 300 uL x 2 or 1 vial of MVT-100 diluted in 50 mL of NS as follows: Two milliliter bolus over 10 seconds prior to each infusion rate;, then infusions will run for 5 minutes at 60 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 90 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 100 mL per hour and 5 minutes at 120 mL per hour. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Echocardiogram | Diagnostic Test | Images will be recorded in parasternal long, short axis, apical four, two, and three chamber views according to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) 17 segment model. Each assessment will include one round of low MI imaging (<0.3) and one round of very low MI imaging (<0.2) in each of the pre-specified windows according to the 2014 ASE Sonographer Guidelines. A baseline echocardiogram will be performed prior to the administration of DEFINITY® or MVT-100. Assessments will be made three times, once from 0 - 1 ½ minutes following injection, once between 1 ½ minutes to 3 minutes following IV injection and once from 3 - 4 ½ minutes following IV injection. Assessments at each time point will include one round of low MI imaging (<0.3) and one round of very low MI imaging (<0.2). Each round will include the views in the following order: parasternal long, parasternal short, apical 4, apical 2 and apical 3. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| QT Interval | The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®) | Day of study |
| Blood Pressure | The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®) | Day of study |
| Heart Rate | The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®) | Day of study |
| Oxygen Saturation | The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Left Ventricular Opacification (LVO) | The null hypothesis for efficacy (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as effective as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for efficacy will be: MVT-100 is equivalently or more effective than DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: LVO(MVT-100) ≥ LVO(Definity®) HA: SegmentVisualization(MVT-100) ≥ SegmentVisualization(Definity®) | Day of Study |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult subjects 19 years of age or older, male or female
Female subjects must no longer have child-bearing potential (>1-year post menopause or surgically sterilized), or must
Adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function, as defined by:
Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L
Platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L
Hemoglobin ≥ 90 g/L
Plasma creatinine< 1.5 x ULN
Total bilirubin within normal limits (< 2.5 x ULN if Gilbert's syndrome)
Aspartate transaminase (AST) and Alanine transaminase (ALT) < 2.5 x ULN
Subject must be willing and able to understand the study and provide written Informed Consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City | Kansas City | Missouri | 64111 | United States | ||
| University of Nebraska Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22692172 | Background | Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson HS, Flynn M, Greenlee RT, Kruger RL, Hornbrook MC, Roblin D, Solberg LI, Vanneman N, Weinmann S, Williams AE. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2400-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5960. | |
| 23764145 | Background | Platts DG, Luis SA, Roper D, Burstow D, Call T, Forshaw A, Pascoe R. The safety profile of perflutren microsphere contrast echocardiography during rest and stress imaging: results from an Australian multicentre cohort. Heart Lung Circ. 2013 Dec;22(12):996-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2013.05.637. Epub 2013 Jun 10. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004452 | Echocardiography |
| C042852 | perflutren |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057791 | Cardiac Imaging Techniques |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
Ascending dose comparison in healthy volunteers
Not provided
Not provided
The interpreter of echocardiograms in the trial is blinded to the drug which was administered, MVT-100 or Definity.
|
| MVT-100 | Drug | After randomization, MVT-100, the experimental drug, is administered via IV infusion or bolus administration and echocardiograms are subsequently obtained. |
|
| Definity | Drug | After randomization, Definity, the active comparator, is administered via IV infusion or bolus administration and echocardiograms are subsequently obtained. |
|
| Day of study |
| Other Symptoms | The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®) | Day of study |
| Cardiac Segment Visualization | The null hypothesis for efficacy (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as effective as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for efficacy will be: MVT-100 is equivalently or more effective than DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: LVO(MVT-100) ≥ LVO(Definity®) HA: SegmentVisualization(MVT-100) ≥ SegmentVisualization(Definity®) | Day of Study |
| Omaha |
| Nebraska |
| 68198 |
| United States |
| Background | Weissman, Neil J., Warren J. Manning, and Brian C. Downey. Contrast echocardiography: clinical applications. Waltham, MA : UpToDate, 2013. |
| Background | Lantheus Medical Imaging. Definity Package Insert. Definity Imaging. [Online] http://www.definityimaging.com/pdf/DEFINITY_US_PI_515987-0117.pdf. |
| 17765820 | Background | Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, Kuehl CA, Sawada SG; American Society of Echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007 Sep;20(9):1021-41. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.07.003. No abstract available. |
| 25085408 | Background | Porter TR, Abdelmoneim S, Belcik JT, McCulloch ML, Mulvagh SL, Olson JJ, Porcelli C, Tsutsui JM, Wei K. Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: a focused update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Aug;27(8):797-810. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.011. No abstract available. |
| D014463 | Ultrasonography |
| D006334 | Heart Function Tests |
| D003935 | Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular |