This clinical trial aim to evaluate if the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events is not inferior in the hybrid mobile and exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs in comparison to the standard cardiac rehabilitation program.

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs are well established, as their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness is proven. In spite of this, CR remains under-utilized, especially in middle and low-resource settings such as Latin America. As the highest rates of mortality and disability-adjusted life-years in the world are caused by cardiovascular diseases, with a corresponding major impact on economies, there is an urgent need to create more accessible CR delivery models to reach all patients in need. This trial aims to evaluate if the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events is not inferior in a hybrid cardiac rehabilitation program compared to a standard program.

Method and analysis: A non-inferiority, pragmatic, multicenter, parallel (1:1), single blinded, randomized clinical trial will be conducted. 314 patients with coronary artery disease will be recruited consecutively. Participants will be randomized to hybrid or standard rehabilitation programs. The hybrid CR program includes 10 supervised exercise sessions and individualized lifestyle counseling by a physiotherapist, with a transition after 4-6 weeks to unsupervised delivery via text messages and phone calls. The standard CR consists of 18-22 supervised exercise sessions, as well as group education sessions about lifestyle. The intervention in both groups will be by 12 weeks. The primary outcome is a composite of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalizations due to cardiovascular causes. Secondary outcomes are cardiovascular risk factor control, exercise capacity, adherence to physical activity and diet recommendations, health-related quality of life and exercise-related adverse events. The outcomes will be measured at the end of intervention, at 6 months, and at 12-month follow-up from recruitment. The primary outcome will be tracked through the end of the trial. The sample size was calculated considering 5% of the non-inferiority limit. Per protocol and intention-to-treat analysis will be undertaken. A survival analysis will be run for the primary outcome.

Ethics and dissemination: The corresponding ethical committees at the sponsor institution and each center where participants will be recruited approved the study protocol and the Informed Consent form. Research findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Additionally, scientific results will be disseminated among stakeholders and national policy-makers.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age 18 year old or over.
• Patient with coronary artery disease, including Acute Coronary Syndrome (Unstable Angina, Myocardial infarction with or without ST elevation) or stable coronary vessel disease diagnosed by angiography or a stress test.
• Patient treated medically (i.e., medication only) or by thrombolysis, angioplasty, or revascularization surgery.
• Patient with physician referral, that can start CR between 2 weeks and 2 months from their event, diagnosis or procedure.
• Patient able to attend the health center almost twice a week over three months.
• Patient owns a mobile phone.
• Patient that consents to participate in the study through signing an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patient has a planned repeat cardiac or other procedure in next 12 months.
• Explicit contraindication to perform exercise based on American College of Sport Medicine.
• Patients with comorbidities that would interfere with ability to engage in cardiac rehabilitation such as dementia, blindness, deafness, serious mental illness, or frailty.
• Musculoskeletal disease that precludes the patient from performing exercise

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the main results article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

Beginning 6 months following main results article publication.

Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee ("learned intermediary") identified for this purpose.

For individual participant data meta-analysis. Proposals should be directed to Principal Investigator. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.