Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| ethica Clinical Research Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Multicenter, double-blind study comparing SLI-F06 to vehicle formulation buffer for the improvement in scar appearance and wound strength in routine surgical excisions, as well as post-operative abdominoplasty scar appearance.
The study is divided into 2 parts where Part A is a Phase I safety/proof of concept study of small scars pre-abdominoplasty, and Part B is a Phase IIa study of post-abdominoplasty scars.
In Part A of the study, subjects will have their abdominoplasty site mapped to accommodate a series of excisions depending on pannus size. All excisions to be treated with SLI-F06 will be on one side of the mapped area (i.e., left side or right side) and vehicle treated excisions will be on the other side of the mapped area. At time of abdominoplasty the excision site will be harvested and processed.
In Part B of the study, subjects who complete Part A will be randomly assigned to receive injections of SLI-F06 along one half (left or right) of the abdominoplasty incision and control injections along the other half. The subject will undergo routine wound care and will attend study follow-up visits following abdominoplasty. The entire incision will be treated post-operatively in precisely the same manner.
Duration of study-approximately 26 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLI-F06 | Active Comparator | Drug Product under investigation |
|
| Formulation Buffer | Placebo Comparator | Placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLI-F06 | Drug | Active treatment |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) - PI Assessment | POSAS is an established scale for assessing scar by both the patient and the observer. The overall opinion of the scar is reported on a scale of 1-10, with 1 being normal skin and 10 being the worst scar. Comparisons between treatment groups for efficacy analyses are based on 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated using mixed models with treatment group as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect to account for multiple observations (i.e., scars) within subject. | Post-excision at Month 3 |
| Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) - PI Assessment | POSAS is an established scale for assessing scar by both the patient and the observer. The overall opinion of the scar is reported on a scale of 1-10, with 1 being normal skin and 10 being the worst scar. Comparisons between treatment groups for efficacy analyses are based on 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated using mixed models with treatment group as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect to account for multiple observations (i.e., scars) within subject. | Post-abdominoplasty at Month 12 |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Robert D. Galiano, MD | Northwestern University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site 1 | Chicago | Illinois | 60611-2950 | United States | ||
| Site 2 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | All Study Participants | All study participants served as their own control. In Part A, subjects had their abdominoplasty site mapped with equal excisions on left/right of midline to accommodate small (12), medium (14) or large (18) pannus excisions with standardized 3 cm length. In Part B, subjects received injections of SLI-F06 along one half (left/right) of the abdominoplasty incision and control injections along the other half. The solution of SLI-F06 or vehicle solution was injected intradermally into BOTH edges of the surgical wound immediately prior to closure (Part A) and before/after closure (Part B). The concentration of SLI-F06 was 25 mg/ml. In Part A, a total of 0.4 mL (10 mg) was injected once at each excision site. A total of 0.2 mL (5 mg) was injected along EACH SIDE of the wound edge. As each wound edge was 3 cm in length, 0.05 mL was injected per 0.75 cm of wound edge. The total exposure of SLI-F06 for subjects with small pannus was approximately 60 mg (6 treated excisions), for subjects with a medium pannus approximately 70 mg (7 treated excisions), and for subjects with a large pannus approximately 90 mg (9 treated excisions). In Part B of the study, 0.05 mL was injected once per 0.75 cm of wound edge as above. A subject with an incision length of 25 cm (12.5 cm active treatment) was exposed to 41.6 mg of SLI-F06, while subjects with an incision length of 30 cm (15 cm active treatment) or 32 cm (16 cm active treatment) were exposed to 50 mg or 53.3 mg, respectively. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Part A: Pre-abdominoplasty Injections |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Part B: Abdominoplasty Injections |
|
In Part A, there were 140 treated scars and 140 control scars per subject for a total of 280. In Part B, there was one abdominoplasty incision per patient, with the left or right side receiving treatment or control. Each subject served as their own control.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | All Study Participants | All study participants served as their own control. In Part A, subjects had their abdominoplasty site mapped with equal excisions on left/right of midline to accommodate small (12), medium (14) or large (18) pannus excisions with standardized 3 cm length. In Part B, subjects received injections of SLI-F06 along one half (left/right) of the abdominoplasty incision and control injections along the other half. The solution of SLI-F06 or vehicle solution was injected intradermally into BOTH edges of the surgical wound immediately prior to closure (Part A) and before/after closure (Part B). The concentration of SLI-F06 was 25 mg/ml. In Part A, a total of 0.4 mL (10 mg) was injected once at each excision site. A total of 0.2 mL (5 mg) was injected along EACH SIDE of the wound edge. As each wound edge was 3 cm in length, 0.05 mL was injected per 0.75 cm of wound edge. The total exposure of SLI-F06 for subjects with small pannus was approximately 60 mg (6 treated excisions), for subjects with a medium pannus approximately 70 mg (7 treated excisions), and for subjects with a large pannus approximately 90 mg (9 treated excisions). In Part B of the study, 0.05 mL was injected once per 0.75 cm of wound edge as above. A subject with an incision length of 25 cm (12.5 cm active treatment) was exposed to 41.6 mg of SLI-F06, while subjects with an incision length of 30 cm (15 cm active treatment) or 32 cm (16 cm active treatment) were exposed to 50 mg or 53.3 mg, respectively. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) - PI Assessment | POSAS is an established scale for assessing scar by both the patient and the observer. The overall opinion of the scar is reported on a scale of 1-10, with 1 being normal skin and 10 being the worst scar. Comparisons between treatment groups for efficacy analyses are based on 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated using mixed models with treatment group as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect to account for multiple observations (i.e., scars) within subject. | Part A: Pre-abdominoplasty excisions | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Post-excision at Month 3 | Scars | Scars |
|
Subjects were assessed at Visit 4a (Day 29), Visit 5a (Day 57 - Group 2 only), Visit 6a (Day 85 - Group 1 only), Visits 3b-12b (M1-3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 at study exit).
No difference in definition
Systematic Assessment: Subjects were questioned for the occurrence of any new or worsening signs or symptoms at each visit. Safety laboratory tests were conducted at select study visits. Clinically significant adverse events were reported.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | SLI-F06 | Drug Product under investigation SLI-F06: Active treatment | 0 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pulmonary embolism | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seroma drainage | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Elisabeth Leeflang | Scarless Labs Inc. | 213-788-2128 | Clin_Info@scarlesslabs.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Nov 20, 2020 | Dec 2, 2022 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 9, 2020 | Dec 2, 2022 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002921 | Cicatrix |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005355 | Fibrosis |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Formulation buffer |
| Drug |
Placebo treatment |
|
|
| St Louis |
| Missouri |
| 63110 |
| United States |
| Site 3 | Bala-Cynwyd | Pennsylvania | 19004 | United States |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| BMI | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
| Formulation Buffer |
Placebo Formulation buffer: Placebo treatment |
|
|
| Primary | Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) - PI Assessment | POSAS is an established scale for assessing scar by both the patient and the observer. The overall opinion of the scar is reported on a scale of 1-10, with 1 being normal skin and 10 being the worst scar. Comparisons between treatment groups for efficacy analyses are based on 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated using mixed models with treatment group as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect to account for multiple observations (i.e., scars) within subject. | Part B: Abdominoplasty incisions | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Post-abdominoplasty at Month 12 | Scars | Scars |
|
|
|
| 22 |
| 3 |
| 22 |
| 14 |
| 22 |
| EG001 | Formulation Buffer | Placebo Formulation buffer: Placebo treatment | 0 | 22 | 3 | 22 | 14 | 22 |
| Abortion spontaneous | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Umbilical hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin necrosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Seroma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Aortic arteriosclerosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dermoid cyst | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Atelectasis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Synovial cyst | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sinus tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Allergy to surgical sutures | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tension headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Drain site complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tendonitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza like illness | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Incision site hemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dermatitis allergic | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Impaired healing | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin irritation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dermatitis contact | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Wound dehiscence | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided