Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sequential use of CoolSculpting (Cryolipolysis) and radiofrequency treatment of the submental and submandibular area.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cryolipolysis Followed by Radiofrequency Treatment | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The ZELTIQ System | Device | Participants received cryolipolysis treatment in submental and submandibular areas using the CoolSculpting System and CoolMini applicator for fat layer reduction on Day 0, which was followed with a radiofrequency treatment performed 12 weeks after CoolSculpting. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs) | UADEs were defined as any serious adverse effect on health and safety or any life-threatening problem or death caused by, or associated with a device, if that effect, problem, or death was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in the investigational plan or application, or any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device that relates to the rights, safety, or welfare of participants. | From date of first treatment to 12 weeks after final treatment (up to 24 weeks) |
| Number of Participants With Global Aesthetic Improvement Per Independent Physician Review of Photographs Based on Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS-Independent) | Photos obtained during the study were reviewed by an independent physician reviewer who entered assessments according to the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The GAIS had outcome choices of "very much improved", "much improved", "improved", "no change", "worse", "much worse", or "very much worse", with "very much improved" representing the most aesthetic improvement. Reported here is the sum of participants who were assessed as improved ("Very Much Improved," "Much Improved", and "Improved"). | Baseline, 12 weeks post radiofrequency treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change From Baseline in Fat Layer Thickness | Fat layer thickness was measured using a caliper at the center of the treatment area. | Baseline, 12 weeks post radiofrequency treatment |
| Number of Participants With Improvement Based on Subject-graded Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innovation Research Center | Pleasanton | California | 94588 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A separate cohort was initially planned for radiofrequency treatment immediately following cryolipolysis at the same visit, however no participants were enrolled in this cohort.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Cryolipolysis Followed by Radiofrequency Treatment | Participants received cryolipolysis treatment in submental and submandibular areas using the CoolSculpting System and CoolMini applicator for fat layer reduction on Day 0, which was followed with a radiofrequency treatment performed 12 weeks after CoolSculpting. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
The Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least one study treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Cryolipolysis Followed by Radiofrequency Treatment | Participants received cryolipolysis treatment in submental and submandibular areas using the CoolSculpting System and CoolMini applicator for fat layer reduction on Day 0, which was followed with a radiofrequency treatment performed 12 weeks after CoolSculpting. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Unanticipated Adverse Device Effects (UADEs) | UADEs were defined as any serious adverse effect on health and safety or any life-threatening problem or death caused by, or associated with a device, if that effect, problem, or death was not previously identified in nature, severity, or degree of incidence in the investigational plan or application, or any other unanticipated serious problem associated with a device that relates to the rights, safety, or welfare of participants. | The Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least one study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From date of first treatment to 12 weeks after final treatment (up to 24 weeks) |
|
From date of first treatment to 12 weeks after final treatment (up to 24 weeks)
The Safety Population consisted of all participants who received at least one study treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Cryolipolysis Followed by Radiofrequency Treatment | Participants received cryolipolysis treatment in submental and submandibular areas using the CoolSculpting System and CoolMini applicator for fat layer reduction on Day 0, which was followed with a radiofrequency treatment performed 12 weeks after CoolSculpting. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sally Hallas, RN, Director Clinical Development - Body Contouring | Zeltiq | 209-294-5571 | sally.hallas@abbvie.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 19, 2019 | Nov 20, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Participants rated improvement in their treatment areas based on the SGAIS. The SGAIS had outcome choices of "very much improved", "much improved", "improved", "no change", "worse", "much worse", or "very much worse", with "very much improved" representing the most aesthetic improvement. Reported here is the sum of participants who reported as improved ("Very Much Improved," "Much Improved", and "Improved"). |
| Baseline, 12 weeks post radiofrequency treatment |
| Number of Participants With Positive Response in Subject Self-Rating Scale (SSRS) Score | Participants assessed their own satisfaction with their face and chin using the SSRS. The SSRS is a participants self-rating scale, scored on a 7-point scale with 0=extremely dissatisfied, 1=dissatisfied, 2=slightly dissatisfied, 3=neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4=slightly satisfied, 5=satisfied, and 6=extremely satisfied, with 6 representing higher participant satisfaction. Reported here is the number of participants with a score of 4 or higher, indicating satisfaction. | Baseline, 12 weeks post radiofrequency treatment |
| Number of Participants With Positive Response on Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire | Participants reported their satisfaction with aspects of treatment on a written questionnaire which included a 5-point Likert scale ranging from -2 to 2, with -2 representing more negative response and 2 representing more positive response. Reported here are the numbers of participants with responses of 1 or 2, indicating a positive response, to the following categories: Comfort of Treatment Procedure, How Visible is Fat Reduction, Overall Effect from the Procedure, Overall Satisfaction with Treatment from the Procedure to the Result, Made Me Look More Youthful, Made My Chin Look More Toned, Feel Less Self-Conscious About Chin Fat, Overall Appearance Has Improved. | Baseline, 12 Weeks Post Radiofrequency Treatment |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Global Aesthetic Improvement Per Independent Physician Review of Photographs Based on Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS-Independent) | Photos obtained during the study were reviewed by an independent physician reviewer who entered assessments according to the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). The GAIS had outcome choices of "very much improved", "much improved", "improved", "no change", "worse", "much worse", or "very much worse", with "very much improved" representing the most aesthetic improvement. Reported here is the sum of participants who were assessed as improved ("Very Much Improved," "Much Improved", and "Improved"). | The Per-protocol population (PP) consisted of all participants who received both CoolSculpting and radiofrequency treatment, and had a weight change of no more than 5 percent at the time of the 12-week post final treatment visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline, 12 weeks post radiofrequency treatment |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Fat Layer Thickness | Fat layer thickness was measured using a caliper at the center of the treatment area. | The PP population consisted of all participants who received both CoolSculpting and radiofrequency treatment, and had a weight change of no more than 5 percent at the time of the 12-week post final treatment visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percent change | Baseline, 12 weeks post radiofrequency treatment |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Improvement Based on Subject-graded Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (SGAIS) | Participants rated improvement in their treatment areas based on the SGAIS. The SGAIS had outcome choices of "very much improved", "much improved", "improved", "no change", "worse", "much worse", or "very much worse", with "very much improved" representing the most aesthetic improvement. Reported here is the sum of participants who reported as improved ("Very Much Improved," "Much Improved", and "Improved"). | The PP population consisted of all participants who received both CoolSculpting and radiofrequency treatment, and had a weight change of no more than 5 percent at the time of the 12-week post final treatment visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline, 12 weeks post radiofrequency treatment |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Positive Response in Subject Self-Rating Scale (SSRS) Score | Participants assessed their own satisfaction with their face and chin using the SSRS. The SSRS is a participants self-rating scale, scored on a 7-point scale with 0=extremely dissatisfied, 1=dissatisfied, 2=slightly dissatisfied, 3=neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4=slightly satisfied, 5=satisfied, and 6=extremely satisfied, with 6 representing higher participant satisfaction. Reported here is the number of participants with a score of 4 or higher, indicating satisfaction. | The PP population consisted of all participants who received both CoolSculpting and radiofrequency treatment, and had a weight change of no more than 5 percent at the time of the 12-week post final treatment visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline, 12 weeks post radiofrequency treatment |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Positive Response on Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire | Participants reported their satisfaction with aspects of treatment on a written questionnaire which included a 5-point Likert scale ranging from -2 to 2, with -2 representing more negative response and 2 representing more positive response. Reported here are the numbers of participants with responses of 1 or 2, indicating a positive response, to the following categories: Comfort of Treatment Procedure, How Visible is Fat Reduction, Overall Effect from the Procedure, Overall Satisfaction with Treatment from the Procedure to the Result, Made Me Look More Youthful, Made My Chin Look More Toned, Feel Less Self-Conscious About Chin Fat, Overall Appearance Has Improved. | The Per-protocol population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 study treatment and had a weight change of no more than 5 percent at the time of the 12-week post final treatment visit. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline, 12 Weeks Post Radiofrequency Treatment |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 8 |
| 0 |
| 8 |
| 0 |
| 8 |
AbbVie requests that any investigator or institution that plans on presenting/publishing results disclosure, provide written notification of their request 60 days prior to their presentation/publication. AbbVie requests that no presentation/publication will be instituted until 12 months after a study is completed, or after the first presentation/publication whichever occurs first. A delay may be proposed of a presentation/publication if AbbVie needs to secure patent or proprietary protection.
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Overall Satisfaction with Treatment, from the Procedure to the Result |
|
| Made Me Look More Youthful |
|
| Made My Chin Look More Toned |
|
| Feel Less Self-Conscious About Chin Fat |
|
| Overall Appearance Has Improved |
|