Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In suspected facet joints pain, it is recommended to perform nerve blocks to establish the diagnosis with positive results being and indicator of successful of most permanent treatment of facet pain by rhizolysis. Nevertheless, the usefulness of intraarticular joint injection for diagnosis and prediction of successful neurolysis have been scarcely studied. The main purpose of this trial is to compare both methods, nerve block and intra articular injection, in diagnosis and treatment of facet joints pain.
Facet joint pain is considered as a nonspecific cause of spinal pain with an estimated prevalence of 12-61% of the population. At present, there are no unanimous clinical criteria to achieve and accurate diagnosis and the imaging findings do not show a direct correlation with the clinical symptoms.
Facet syndrome treatment is also controversial and, although most clinical guidelines recommend nerve block as a diagnostic test, followed by neurolysis as therapeutic technique, there are many detractors of this therapeutic sequence.
The confusion is even greater when considering the variability of specialists who perform these techniques, the variability of methods used ranging from blind injections to injections guided by ultrasound, fluoroscopy or CT, or the amount of medication injected.
The investigators have long experience in the percutaneous treatment of pain and in the use of different imaging techniques. Although the investigators objectives are multiple, the main one is to know if there are any difference in the outcome of the facet syndrome treated by intra-articular injections and the block of the medial branch of the dorsal branch of the spinal nerve.
Along with the collaboration of other specialists the investigators want to address secondary objectives such as the usefulness of ultrasound and fluoroscopy in the treatment of facet syndrome and its comparison with those performed under CT guidance that is considered as the standard technique for its greater precision.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| FACET JOINT UNDER CT GUIDANCE | Experimental | Injection of the facet joint under computed tomography guidance |
|
| NERVE BLOCK UNDER CT GUIDANCE | Active Comparator | Injection of the nerve under computed tomography guidance |
|
| FACET JOINT UNDER FLUOROSCOPY GUIDANCE | Experimental | Injection of the facet joint under fluoroscopy guidance |
|
| NERVE BLOCK UNDER FLUOROSCOPY GUIDANCE | Active Comparator | Injection of the nerve under ultrasound guidance |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FACET JOINT UNDER CT GUIDANCE | Diagnostic Test | injection of triamcinolone in the facet joint under CT guidance |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain (VAS score) | score from no pain (0) to maximum pain (10) | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oswestry scale | score from no disability(0) to maximum disability (10) | 1 year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
1- Lumbar facet syndrome diagnosed by the referring specialist: Rehabilitation, Traumatology or Neurosurgery 2 -Mechanical low back pain that increases with rotation and flexion-extension, without radicular irradiation.
3- failure of conservative treatment (pharmacological and physical therapy). 4-Symptoms present more than 3 months
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALBERTO MARTINEZ MARTINEZ, MD | Contact | +34645558225 | rralbert.martinez@gmail.com | |
| Ana MarÃa Del Valle DÃaz De La Guardia, MD | Contact | +34958895414 | anam.valle.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| FERNANDO RUIZSANTIAGO, PhD | HOSPITAL DE NEURO-TRAUMATOLOGIA GRANADA (VIRGEN DE LAS NIEVES) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Granada | Recruiting | Granada | SPA | 18014 | Spain |
our idea is to publish the short term results and the long term results in order to influence management of this pathology. Tables and statistical analysis will be available for review and metaanalysis.
1 to 2 years
open access
Not provided
Not provided
the patients are randomly assigned to intraarticular injection or nerve block
Not provided
Not provided
The patients and the evaluator don't know if the injection was performed inside the joint or around the nerve
| FACET JOINT UNDER ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE | Experimental | Injection of the facet joint under ultrasound guidance |
|
| NERVE BLOCK UNDER ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE | Active Comparator | Injection of the nerve under computed ultrasound guidance |
|
|
| NERVE BLOCK UNDER CT GUIDANCE | Diagnostic Test | injection of triamcinolone around the dorsal ramus under CT guidance |
|
|
| FACET JOINT UNDER FLUOROSCOPY GUIDANCE | Diagnostic Test | injection of triamcinolone in the facet joint under fluoroscopy guidance |
|
|
| NERVE BLOCK UNDER FLUOROSCOPY GUIDANCE | Diagnostic Test | injection of triamcinolone around the dorsal ramus under fluoroscopy guidance |
|
|
| FACET JOINT UNDER ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE | Diagnostic Test | injection of triamcinolone in the facet joint under ultrasound guidance |
|
|
| NERVE BLOCK UNDER ULTRASOUND GUIDANCE | Diagnostic Test | injection of triamcinolone around the dorsal ramus under ultrasound guidance |
|
|
| Hospital Neuro-Traumatologia | Recruiting | Granada | 1800314 | Spain |
|