Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
PI passed away. Ending grant and closing lab.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Several studies in the past have tried to deactivate electrodes that are less optimal to improve speech recognition outcomes. The study aims to compare the measures based on which the deactivation was performed. The investigators aim to first examine if the measures are strongly correlated each other, and then compare the deactivation effects across measures. These measures are mainly behavioral including electrode discrimination, amplitude modulation detection thresholds, low-rate and focused detection thresholds and electrode-modiolus distance. The endpoint of the study is speech recognition performance post deactivation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cochlear implant users with Nucleus and AB devices | Speech recognition will be evaluated after poor electrodes are turned off. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Site selection | Behavioral | Turning off electrodes on the electrode array based on imaging and psychophysical measures |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Speech recognition with deactivation | Electrodes will be evaluated based on (1) pitch discrimination (2) focused thresholds (3) amplitude modulation detection thresholds and (4) distances from the modious. Electrodes will be deactivated based on each of these measures and speech recognition will be evaluated to assess the effect of deactivation. The benefit of deactivation (speech recognition after deactivation minus before deactivation) will be derived for each measure. The measure that produces the greatest benefit will be identified. | 12 months post award notice and will take up to 3.5 years to complete |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Children and adults with cochlear implants
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ning Zhou, PHD | East Carolina University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, ECU | Greenville | North Carolina | 27834 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27758152 | Background | Debruyne JA, Francart T, Janssen AM, Douma K, Brokx JP. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance. Int J Audiol. 2017 Mar;56(3):174-185. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1243262. Epub 2016 Oct 19. | |
| 23881208 | Background | Garadat SN, Zwolan TA, Pfingst BE. Using temporal modulation sensitivity to select stimulation sites for processor MAPs in cochlear implant listeners. Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(4):247-60. doi: 10.1159/000351302. Epub 2013 Jul 20. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003638 | Deafness |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D034381 | Hearing Loss |
| D006311 | Hearing Disorders |
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C534389 | Bud13 protein, S cerevisiae |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 9334769 | Background | Nadol JB Jr. Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Sep;117(3 Pt 1):220-8. doi: 10.1016/s0194-5998(97)70178-5. |
| 2729822 | Background | Nadol JB Jr, Young YS, Glynn RJ. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound sensorineural hearing loss: implications for cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1989 Jun;98(6):411-6. doi: 10.1177/000348948909800602. |
| 23529109 | Background | Noble JH, Labadie RF, Gifford RH, Dawant BM. Image-guidance enables new methods for customizing cochlear implant stimulation strategies. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013 Sep;21(5):820-9. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2253333. Epub 2013 Mar 19. |
| 25120196 | Background | Seyyedi M, Viana LM, Nadol JB Jr. Within-subject comparison of word recognition and spiral ganglion cell count in bilateral cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol. 2014 Sep;35(8):1446-50. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000443. |
| 27798658 | Background | Zhou N. Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 31;11(10):e0165476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165476. eCollection 2016. |
| 28372106 | Background | Zhou N. Deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds improves spectral ripple and speech reception thresholds in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Mar;141(3):EL243. doi: 10.1121/1.4977235. |
| 22894220 | Background | Zhou N, Pfingst BE. Psychophysically based site selection coupled with dichotic stimulation improves speech recognition in noise with bilateral cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):994-1008. doi: 10.1121/1.4730907. |
| 9407659 | Background | Zwolan TA, Collins LM, Wakefield GH. Electrode discrimination and speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Dec;102(6):3673-85. doi: 10.1121/1.420401. |
| 27317668 | Background | Bierer JA, Litvak L. Reducing Channel Interaction Through Cochlear Implant Programming May Improve Speech Perception: Current Focusing and Channel Deactivation. Trends Hear. 2016 Jun 17;20:2331216516653389. doi: 10.1177/2331216516653389. |
| 23467170 | Background | Srinivasan AG, Padilla M, Shannon RV, Landsberger DM. Improving speech perception in noise with current focusing in cochlear implant users. Hear Res. 2013 May;299:29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 1. |
| D012678 |
| Sensation Disorders |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |