Participants randomized to the experimental group will receive hearing aid fitting and verification services via teleaudiology with local, hands-on support from a Community Health Worker.

Participants randomized to the control group will receive hearing aid fitting and verification services via teleaudiology with local, hands-on support from a non-Community Health Worker (undergraduate student in Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences).

In this project, remote hearing aid fittings will be delivered by an audiologist with patient-site support from a local facilitator for a cohort of older adults (>50 years) from a rural area that has been identified as under-resourced for hearing health care.

The Self-Efficacy for Situational Communication Management Questionnaire (Jennings, 2005; Jennings et al, 2014) measures self-perceived hearing ability and hearing self-efficacy, or a participant's beliefs in their ability to manage communication with acquired hearing loss. The SESMQ contains 20 situations that are rated on two scales, hearing ability and perceived self-efficacy. Participants respond on a Likert scale from 0 (not well at all) to 10 (very well) to how well they can hear and how well they can manage in each situation. Total scores on each scale range from 0-200, with higher scores representing better perceived self-efficacy and better hearing ability. The two scales are scored and reported separately.

We will evaluate the differences in SESMQ scores between experimental and control groups at 2-weeks post hearing aid fitting. Analyses will utilize baseline data and follow-up analyses will occur for 6-week and 12-week timepoints.

The Effectiveness of Auditory Rehabilitation (Yueh et al., 2005; EAR) is a subjective scale of hearing aid function and quality of life. The first set of questions is administered before and after the hearing aid fitting, and relates to hearing concerns, including listening in quiet and other situations. The second set of questions relates to functioning with the hearing device, such as fit and convenience, and is administered after the hearing aid fitting.

We will evaluate the differences in inner EAR scores between experimental and control groups at 6-weeks post hearing aid fitting. Analyses will utilize baseline data where appropriate and follow-up analyses will occur for 6-week and 12-week timepoints.

Participants are asked to respond to statements on a five-point scale (i.e. very poor, poor, so-so, good, very good). Each answer is awarded a point. Higher cumulative scores indicate better benefit.