Electronic fetal hear rate monitoring (EFM), or cardiotocography (CTG), records changes in fetal heart rate and their temporal relationship to uterine contraction. It has been developed with the aim of detecting fetal hypoxia during labor and hence to prevent metabolic acidosis. Despite being the standard for intrapartum management, this technique, significantly increase the operative delivery rate, and is associated only with less seizures as neonatal benefit. Another concern is also the variability in the interpretation.

Several techniques have been studied in order to decrease the high false positive rate. Fetal ST waveform analysis (STAN) has been studied combined with CTG. A recent meta-analysis of randomized trials, however, showed that STAN during labor did not improve perinatal outcomes or decrease operative delivery rates, except for a 9% decrease in operative vaginal delivery.Comparisons of visual and computerized interpretation of EFM have also been reported. However, whether or fetal monitoring with computer analysis improve perinatal outcomes is still subject of debate.

Thus, we aim to evaluate whether intrapartum fetal monitoring with computer analysis increase the incidence of obstetric intervention when compared with visual analysis through a single-center randomized controlled trial.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Women with singleton gestation
• 18 years to 50 years
• High risk pregnancies: DM, or GDM, or hypertension, or preeclampsia

Exclusion Criteria:

- IUGR

pregnant women

not planned