Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study investigated the impact of Automatic Sound Management 3.0 (i.e. ambient noise reduction, transient noise reduction and an adaptive intelligence) as implemented in the SONNET2 on CI users' speech performance and their subjective quality of hearing and device handling.
MED-EL Cochlear Implants (CI) provide auditory sensations via electrical stimulation of the auditory pathways for severely to profoundly hearing-impaired individuals who obtain little or no benefit from acoustic amplification in the best aided condition. Front-end processing of acoustic signals picked up by the audio processor is routinely applied to provide optimal hearing performance under varying listening conditions. Automatic Sound Management (ASM) was introduced by MED-EL with the TEMPO+ audio processor and provided advanced compression and automatic gain management. With the SONNET audio processor, MED-EL introduced ASM 2.0, which added wind noise reduction and microphone directionality to the front-end processing. With the new SONNET2 audio processor, ASM 3.0 was implemented and the features ambient noise reduction, transient noise reduction and an adaptive intelligence (AI) were added.
This study investigated the impact of ASM 3.0 as implemented in the SONNET2 on CI users' speech performance and their subjective quality of hearing.
Subjects' speech performance was tested in quiet (Freiburg Monosyllables Test) and noise (OLSA) with the SONNET audio processor and the SONNNET 2 audio processor (OPUS 2 Configuration, SONNET Configuration, SONNET 2 Configurations 1-4). Additionally, quality of hearing with two questionnaires (HISQUI19, SSQ12) was evaluated with the subjects SONNET and the SONNET 2 configurations 1-4. Device handling with the SONNET and the SONNET 2 audio processor was investigated with a questionnaire (APSQ). Additionally, the data logging function of the SONNET2 audio processor was used to investigate differences in the use of the SONNET configuration and the SONNET 2 configurations 1-4. Subjects were asked to rate the SONNET 2 configurations 1-4 against the SONNET configuration with a product-specific SONNET2 questionnaires. Further, subjective sound quality was evaluated in different auditory settings and subjects' subjective listening effort was evaluated using the ACAES test with the SONNET 2 (OPUS configuration, SONNET configuration, SONNET 2 configuration 1&2).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects | Adult unilateral MED-EL Cochlear implant users (≥ 6 months), with post-lingual, severe to profound sensory-neural hearing loss. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audio processor SONNET | Device | AI - N/A, WNR - Mild, Beam-former - NAT, AGC Compression - 3:1, AGC Sensitivity - 75%, ANR - N/A, TNR - N/A |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Speech in noise | Oldenburg Sentence Test in noise (S0N0) | 8 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Speech in quiet | Freiburg Monosyllabic test in quiet | 8 weeks |
| Speech in noise | Oldenburg Sentence Test in noise (S0N0) | 8 weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Post-lingually deafened adult cochlear implant users with a MED-EL device
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenkrankheiten, plastische und ästhetische Operationen | Würzburg | Bavaria | 97080 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36108069 | Result | Kurz A, Rak K, Hagen R. Improved performance with automatic sound management 3 in the MED-EL SONNET 2 cochlear implant audio processor. PLoS One. 2022 Sep 15;17(9):e0274446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274446. eCollection 2022. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Results of the study, published in an article | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | May 9, 2019 | Oct 18, 2023 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 24, 2020 | Oct 18, 2023 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D034381 | Hearing Loss |
| D006319 | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural |
| D006312 | Hearing Loss, Bilateral |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006311 | Hearing Disorders |
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| D012678 | Sensation Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| SONNET 2: Configuration 1 | Device | AI - Off, WNR - Mild, Beam-former - NAT, AGC Compression - 3:1, AGC Sensitivity - 75%, ANR - Mild, TNR - Mild |
|
| SONNET 2: Configuration 2 | Device | AI - Off, WNR - Mild, Beam-former - NAT, AGC Compression - 3:1, AGC Sensitivity - 75%, ANR - Strong, TNR - Strong |
|
| SONNET 2: Configuration 3 | Device | AI - Mild, WNR - Mild, Beam-former - Auto (NAT), AGC Compression - 3:1, AGC Sensitivity - 75%, ANR - Auto (Off-Mild), TNR - Auto (Off-Mild) |
|
| SONNET 2: Configuration 4 | Device | AI - Strong, WNR - Strong, Beam-former - Auto (OMNI-ABF), AGC Compression - 3:1, AGC Sensitivity - 75%, ANR - Auto (Off-Strong), TNR - Auto (Off-Strong) |
|
| SONNET 2: OPUS 2 configuration | Device | AI - Off, WNR - Off, Beam-former - OMNI, AGC Compression - 3:1, AGC Sensitivity - 75%, ANR - N/A, TNR - N/A |
|
| SONNET 2: SONNET configuration | Device | AI - Off, WNR - Mild, Beam-former - NAT, AGC Compression - 3:1, AGC Sensitivity - 75%, ANR - N/A, TNR - N/A |
|
| Speech in noise | Oldenburg Sentence Test in noise (S0N0T0) | 8 weeks |
| Speech in noise | Oldenburg Sentence Test in noise (S0, ±N45, ± N135) | 8 weeks |
| Quality of hearing | Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index | 8 weeks |
| Quality of hearing | Questionnaire: The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12; short version, 12 items) with a scale range 0 (worst) to 10 (best) | 8 weeks |
| Device handling | Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ) with a scale range 0 (worst) to 10 (best) | 8 weeks |
| Subjective Ratings | Adaptive CAtegorical Listening Effort Scaling (ACALES); Subjectively perceived listening Effort is evaluated using a 14-step scale contains eight labelled categories (from "effortless" to "extremely strenuous" and "noise only") | 8 weeks |
| Subjective Ratings | Subjective Sound Quality Rating | 8 weeks |
| User Satisfaction | A product specific questionnaire will be used to gain user satisfaction on the new audio processor and individual setting preferences | 8 weeks |
| Device Use | Data Logging | 8 weeks |
| Sound Quality and Quality of hearing | Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index 19 (HISQUI19) with a 7-point rating scale (never to always) | 8 weeks |
| D009461 |
| Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |