Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-002740-82 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a study in adults with schizophrenia. The study tests whether a medicine called BI 425809 together with brain training improves mental abilities.
Participants take study medication once a day for 12 weeks. At the start of the study, the participants are put into 2 groups. It is decided by chance who gets into which group. One group gets BI 425809 tablets every day. The other group gets placebo tablets every day. Placebo tablets look like the BI 425809 tablets, but contain no medicine. During the study, all participants do brain training using a computer.
The doctors regularly test mental abilities of the participants. The results of the mental ability tests are compared between the groups. The doctors also check the general health of the patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| BI 425809 10 mg + Computerized Cognitive Training | Experimental |
| |
| Placebo + Computerized Cognitive Training | Placebo Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BI 425809 | Drug | Tablet |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function as Measured by the Neurocognitive Composite Score of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 12 Weeks of Treatment | MCCB neurocognitive composite T-score assesses 6 cognitive domains, including speed of processing, attention vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving. MCCB neurocognitive T-scores in the general population have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher T-score indicates better cognition. Change from baseline in MCCB neurocognitive composite T-score at Week 12 was modelled based on a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based approach using a mixed model with repeated measurements (MMRM) which included the following fixed effects: categorical factor of planned treatment, visit (screening, baseline, week 6 and Week 12), planned treatment by visit interaction, continuous covariate of baseline value, baseline by visit interaction, categorical factor of age group, and continuous covariate of change from screening to baseline value. The Least Squares Mean (95 % Confidence Interval) at Week 12 is reported. | At screening (28 days prior to first drug drug administration), at baseline and at Weeks 6 and 12 after first drug administration. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Measured by the Overall MCCB Composite T Score (Including Social Cognition) After 12 Weeks of Treatment | MCCB cognitive score comprises 10 tests, which assess 7 cognitive domains, including speed of processing, attention vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. MCCB cognitive T-scores in the general population have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher T-score indicates better cognition. Change from baseline in MCCB overall composite T-score was modelled using a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based approach using a mixed model with repeated measurements (MMRM) which included the following fixed effects: categorical factor of planned treatment, visit (screening, baseline, week 6 and Week 12), planned treatment by visit interaction, continuous covariate of baseline value, baseline by visit interaction, categorical factor of age group, and continuous covariate of change from screening to baseline value. The Least Squares Mean (95 % Confidence Interval) at Week 12 is reported. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP) and local legislation prior to admission to the trial.
Male or female patients who are 18-50 years (inclusive) of age at time of consent.
Established schizophrenia (as per DSM-5) with the following clinical features:
Patients must be on stable antipsychotic treatment; also, current antipsychotic medications and concomitant anticholinergics, antiepileptics, lithium and allowed antidepressants must meet the criteria below:
Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP)2 must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control per Non-Clinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals (ICH M3 (R2)) that result in a low failure rate of less than 1% per year when used consistently and correctly. A list of contraception methods meeting these criteria is provided in Section 4.2.2.3. Such methods should be used throughout the trial, and for a period of at least 35 days after last trial drug intake, and the patient must agree to periodic pregnancy testing during participation in the trial.
Patients must demonstrate their ability to properly use the CCT device and program, as well as be compliant with CCT run-in (defined as completing at least 2 hours per week for two weeks, totalling 4 hours CCT, during the screening period)3.
Patients must be able to comply with all protocol procedures, in the investigator's opinion.
Patients must have a study partner who will preferably be consistent throughout the study. It is recommended that the study partner should interact (in-person or telephone) with the subject at least 2 times a week.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who have a categorical diagnosis of another current major psychiatric disorder on the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.).
Diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) that may impact the assessment of the cognitive tests as per investigator's opinion. A movement disorder due to antipsychotic treatment not currently controlled with anti- EPS treatment or another movement disorder (e.g. Parkinson´s disease).
Patients with a history of participating in any formal cognitive remediation program for 10 or more training sessions.
Patients who were treated with any of the following medications within the last 6 months prior to randomization:
Patients receiving any other investigational drug (other than a potential cognitive enhancing drug) within 30 days or 6 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to randomization. For investigational LAI antipsychotics, the last injection must be at least 3 months or two administration cycles (i.e. 6 months if administration is every 3 months) prior to randomization, whichever is longer.
Patients who have participated in a clinical trial with repeated assessments (i.e. a single assessment is not exclusionary) with the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) within the last 6 months prior to randomization.
Patients who required a change in ongoing benzodiazepine or sleep medication dose or regimen within the last 30 days prior to randomization.
Patients with known active infection with SARS-CoV-2 within the last 30 days prior to randomization.
Other exclusion criteria apply
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atria Clinical Research | Little Rock | Arkansas | 72209 | United States | ||
| Woodland Research Northwest |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39759424 | Derived | Harvey PD, McDonald S, Fu E, Reuteman-Fowler C. Efficacy and safety of iclepertin (BI 425809) with adjunctive computerized cognitive training in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res Cogn. 2024 Dec 14;40:100340. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2024.100340. eCollection 2025 Jun. | |
| 32036587 | Derived | Harvey PD, Bowie CR, McDonald S, Podhorna J. Evaluation of the Efficacy of BI 425809 Pharmacotherapy in Patients with Schizophrenia Receiving Computerized Cognitive Training: Methodology for a Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-group Trial. Clin Drug Investig. 2020 Apr;40(4):377-385. doi: 10.1007/s40261-020-00893-8. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
After the study is completed and the primary manuscript is accepted for publishing, researchers can use this following link https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datasharing to request access to the clinical study documents regarding this study, and upon a signed "Document Sharing Agreement".
Also, Researchers can use the following link https://www.mystudywindow.com/msw/datasharing to find information in order to request access to the clinical study data, for this and other listed studies, after the submission of a research proposal and according to the terms outlined in the website.
The data shared are the raw clinical study data sets.
After all regulatory activities are completed in the US and EU for the product and indication, and after the primary manuscript has been accepted for publication.
For study documents - upon signing of a 'Document Sharing Agreement'. For study data - 1. after the submission and approval of the research proposal (checks will be performed by both the independent review panel and the sponsor, including checking that the planned analysis does not compete with sponsor's publication plan); 2. and upon signing of a 'Data Sharing Agreement'.
All subjects were screened for eligibility prior to participation in the trial. Subjects attended a specialist site which ensured that they (the subjects) strictly met all inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria. Subjects were not to be allocated to a treatment group if any of the entry criteria were violated.
Patients were enrolled in the trial once informed consent had been signed. Patients underwent computerised cognitive training (CCT) run-in for 2 weeks during the screening period. Patients compliant with the CCT run-in procedure and otherwise suitable after screening were randomised to the 12-week treatment period assigned at a ratio of 1:1 to 1 of 2 arms.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | BI 425809 10 mg + Computerized Cognitive Training | Patients administered once daily (in the morning) two tablets of 5 milligram (mg) of BI 425809 (total BI 425809 dose= 10 mg) orally for 12 weeks. Concomitantly patients received non-pharmacological adjunctive computerized cognitive training (CCT). |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jul 21, 2020 | Oct 16, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Tablet |
|
| At screening (28 days prior to first drug drug administration), at baseline and at Weeks 6 and 12 after first drug administration. |
| Change From Baseline in the Effect of Cognitive Deficit on Day-to-day Functioning as Measured by SCoRS Total Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment | Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) is a 20-item interview-based assessment of cognitive deficits and the degree to which they affect day-to-day functioning. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale. SCoRS total score is between 20 and 80 where higher score values represent greater degree of impairment in day-to-day functions due to cognitive deficits. The composite score was the average of non-missing responses. If five or more of the 20 items were missing, the composite score was missing for that participant at the visit. Change from baseline in SCoRS total score after 12 weeks of treatment was modelled using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) which included the following fixed effects: categorical factor of planned treatment, continuous covariate of baseline value, categorical factor of age group. | At baseline and at 12 weeks after first drug administration. |
| Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment | PANSS was used to evaluate broad psychopathology associated with schizophrenia disease state. The PANSS has 30 items. Each is rated from 1 to 7 points. The total factor score is the summation of the actual points for each item, leading the total score ranging from 30 to 210; a higher score indicates a worse disease condition. Change from baseline in PANNS total score after 12 weeks of treatment was modelled based on a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based approach using a mixed model with repeated measurements (MMRM) which included the following fixed effects: categorical factor of planned treatment, visit (baseline, Week 6 and Week 12), planned treatment by visit interaction, continuous covariate of baseline value, baseline by visit interaction, categorical factor of age group. The Least Squares Mean (95 % Confidence Interval) at Week 12 is reported. | At baseline and at Weeks 6 and 12 after first drug administration. |
| Percentage of Patients With Any Adverse Event (AE) and With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Percentage of patients with any Adverse Event (AE) and with serious adverse events (SAEs) is reported. Percentages were rounded to one decimal place. | From first dose of study drug administration until four weeks after the last dose of study drug administration, up to 16 weeks. |
| Rogers |
| Arkansas |
| 72758 |
| United States |
| Encino Hospital Medical Center | Encino | California | 91436 | United States |
| Collaborative Neuroscience Network, LLC (CNS) | Garden Grove | California | 92845 | United States |
| Synergy San Diego | Lemon Grove | California | 91945 | United States |
| Catalina Research Institute, LLC | Montclair | California | 91763 | United States |
| Pacific Research Partners, LLC | Oakland | California | 94607 | United States |
| NRC Research Institute | Orange | California | 92868 | United States |
| CNRI - Los Angeles | Pico Rivera | California | 90660 | United States |
| CNRI-San Diego, LLC | San Diego | California | 92102 | United States |
| Collaborative Neuroscience Network, LLC (CNS) | Torrance | California | 90502 | United States |
| Meridien Research | Maitland | Florida | 32751 | United States |
| Premier Clinical Research Institute | Miami | Florida | 33122 | United States |
| University of Miami | Miami | Florida | 33136 | United States |
| Apalachee Center | Tallahassee | Florida | 32308 | United States |
| Jerome Golden Center for Behavioral Health | West Palm Beach | Florida | 33407 | United States |
| Synexus | Atlanta | Georgia | 30328 | United States |
| Uptown Research Institute | Chicago | Illinois | 60640 | United States |
| Lake Charles Clinical Trials LLC | Lake Charles | Louisiana | 70629 | United States |
| Cherry Health | Grand Rapids | Michigan | 49503 | United States |
| Center for Behavioral Medicine | Kansas City | Missouri | 64108 | United States |
| Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. | New York | New York | 10017 | United States |
| UNC Center for Excellence in Community Mental Health, North Carolina Psychiatric Research Center | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27608 | United States |
| Midwest Clinical Research | Dayton | Ohio | 45417 | United States |
| FutureSearch Trials of Dallas, LP | Dallas | Texas | 75231 | United States |
| Pillar Clinical Research, LLC | Richardson | Texas | 75080 | United States |
| Office of Dr. Aqeel Hashmi, MD, PA | Richmond | Texas | 77407 | United States |
| Northwest Clinical Research Center | Bellevue | Washington | 98007 | United States |
| Lyell McEwin Hospital | Elizabeth Vale | South Australia | 5112 | Australia |
| Monash Medical Centre | Clayton | Victoria | 3168 | Australia |
| St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne | Fitzroy | Victoria | 3065 | Australia |
| Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre | Melbourne | Victoria | 3004 | Australia |
| University of Calgary | Calgary | Alberta | T2N 4Z6 | Canada |
| BC Mental Health and Addictions Research Institute (University of British Columbia) | Vancouver | British Columbia | V5Z 4H4 | Canada |
| Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) | Toronto | Ontario | M6J 1H4 | Canada |
| IUSMM Institut Universitaire en Sante Mentale de Montreal | Montreal | Quebec | H1N 3M5 | Canada |
| CTR Esquirol | Caen | 14033 | France |
| HOP Dijon-Bourgogne | Dijon | 21079 | France |
| CAB Médical Psyché | Douai | 59500 | France |
| HOP la Colombière | Montpellier | 34295 | France |
| HOP Saint-Jacques | Nantes | 44093 | France |
| HOP Pasteur | Nice | 06000 | France |
| GHU Paris Psychiatrie et Neurosciences | Paris | 75674 | France |
| HOP Nord | Saint-Priest-en-Jarez | 42270 | France |
| North Shore Hospital, Takapuna | Takpuna Auckland | 0622 | New Zealand |
| The Fritchie Centre | Cheltenham | GL53 9DZ | United Kingdom |
| Royal Edinburgh Hospital | Edinburgh | EH10 5HF | United Kingdom |
| Queen Elizabeth University Hospital | Glasgow | G51 4TF | United Kingdom |
| Maudsley Hospital | London | SE5 8AZ | United Kingdom |
| Warneford Hospital | Oxford | OX3 7JX | United Kingdom |
| Placebo + Computerized Cognitive Training |
Patients administered once daily (in the morning) two tablets of Placebo matching BI 425809 5 milligram (mg) orally for 12 weeks. Concomitantly patients received non-pharmacological adjunctive computerized cognitive training (CCT). |
| COMPLETED | Completed trial medication |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Treated Set (TS) includes all patients in randomized set (RS) who were treated with at least 1 dose of the trial regimen (including both trial drug and computerized cognitive training (CCT)).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | BI 425809 10 mg + Computerized Cognitive Training | Patients administered once daily (in the morning) two tablets of 5 milligram (mg) of BI 425809 (total BI 425809 dose= 10 mg) orally for 12 weeks. Concomitantly patients received non-pharmacological adjunctive computerized cognitive training (CCT). |
| BG001 | Placebo + Computerized Cognitive Training | Patients administered once daily (in the morning) two tablets of Placebo matching BI 425809 5 milligram (mg) orally for 12 weeks. Concomitantly patients received non-pharmacological adjunctive computerized cognitive training (CCT). |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Baseline MCCB neurocognitive composite T-score | Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) neurocognitive composite T-score assesses 6 cognitive domains, including speed of processing, attention vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving. MCCB neurocognitive T-scores in the general population have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher T-score indicates better cognition. | Treated Set (TS) includes all patients in randomized set (RS) who were treated with at least 1 dose of the trial regimen (including both trial drug and computerized cognitive training (CCT)). For one patient MCCB neurocognitive T-Score at baseline was not measured. | Mean | Standard Deviation | T-score |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Neurocognitive Function as Measured by the Neurocognitive Composite Score of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) After 12 Weeks of Treatment | MCCB neurocognitive composite T-score assesses 6 cognitive domains, including speed of processing, attention vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving. MCCB neurocognitive T-scores in the general population have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher T-score indicates better cognition. Change from baseline in MCCB neurocognitive composite T-score at Week 12 was modelled based on a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based approach using a mixed model with repeated measurements (MMRM) which included the following fixed effects: categorical factor of planned treatment, visit (screening, baseline, week 6 and Week 12), planned treatment by visit interaction, continuous covariate of baseline value, baseline by visit interaction, categorical factor of age group, and continuous covariate of change from screening to baseline value. The Least Squares Mean (95 % Confidence Interval) at Week 12 is reported. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) includes all patients in treated set (TS) who had non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing post-baseline on-treatment measurement of the primary efficacy endpoint. The FAS was used for efficacy analyses. Patients were analysed as randomised. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | T-score | At screening (28 days prior to first drug drug administration), at baseline and at Weeks 6 and 12 after first drug administration. |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function as Measured by the Overall MCCB Composite T Score (Including Social Cognition) After 12 Weeks of Treatment | MCCB cognitive score comprises 10 tests, which assess 7 cognitive domains, including speed of processing, attention vigilance, working memory, verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving, and social cognition. MCCB cognitive T-scores in the general population have a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. A higher T-score indicates better cognition. Change from baseline in MCCB overall composite T-score was modelled using a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based approach using a mixed model with repeated measurements (MMRM) which included the following fixed effects: categorical factor of planned treatment, visit (screening, baseline, week 6 and Week 12), planned treatment by visit interaction, continuous covariate of baseline value, baseline by visit interaction, categorical factor of age group, and continuous covariate of change from screening to baseline value. The Least Squares Mean (95 % Confidence Interval) at Week 12 is reported. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) includes all patients in treated set (TS) who had non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing post-baseline on-treatment measurement of the primary efficacy endpoint. The FAS was used for efficacy analyses. Patients were analysed as randomised. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | T-score | At screening (28 days prior to first drug drug administration), at baseline and at Weeks 6 and 12 after first drug administration. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Effect of Cognitive Deficit on Day-to-day Functioning as Measured by SCoRS Total Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment | Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) is a 20-item interview-based assessment of cognitive deficits and the degree to which they affect day-to-day functioning. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale. SCoRS total score is between 20 and 80 where higher score values represent greater degree of impairment in day-to-day functions due to cognitive deficits. The composite score was the average of non-missing responses. If five or more of the 20 items were missing, the composite score was missing for that participant at the visit. Change from baseline in SCoRS total score after 12 weeks of treatment was modelled using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) which included the following fixed effects: categorical factor of planned treatment, continuous covariate of baseline value, categorical factor of age group. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) includes all patients in treated set (TS) who had non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing post-baseline on-treatment measurement of the primary efficacy endpoint. The FAS was used for efficacy analyses. Patients were analysed as randomised. Only patients with non-missing results at Week 12 are reported. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | At baseline and at 12 weeks after first drug administration. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score After 12 Weeks of Treatment | PANSS was used to evaluate broad psychopathology associated with schizophrenia disease state. The PANSS has 30 items. Each is rated from 1 to 7 points. The total factor score is the summation of the actual points for each item, leading the total score ranging from 30 to 210; a higher score indicates a worse disease condition. Change from baseline in PANNS total score after 12 weeks of treatment was modelled based on a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based approach using a mixed model with repeated measurements (MMRM) which included the following fixed effects: categorical factor of planned treatment, visit (baseline, Week 6 and Week 12), planned treatment by visit interaction, continuous covariate of baseline value, baseline by visit interaction, categorical factor of age group. The Least Squares Mean (95 % Confidence Interval) at Week 12 is reported. | Full Analysis Set (FAS) includes all patients in treated set (TS) who had non-missing baseline and at least 1 non-missing post-baseline on-treatment measurement of the primary efficacy endpoint. The FAS was used for efficacy analyses. Patients were analysed as randomised. One patient in the arm "Placebo + Computerized Cognitive Training" was excluded from the statistical model, because the patient did not have post-baseline PANSS total score values. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | At baseline and at Weeks 6 and 12 after first drug administration. |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Any Adverse Event (AE) and With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Percentage of patients with any Adverse Event (AE) and with serious adverse events (SAEs) is reported. Percentages were rounded to one decimal place. | Treated Set (TS) includes all patients in randomized set (RS) who were treated with at least 1 dose of the trial regimen (including both trial drug and computerized cognitive training (CCT)). | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | From first dose of study drug administration until four weeks after the last dose of study drug administration, up to 16 weeks. |
|
From first dose of study drug administration until four weeks after the last dose of study drug administration, up to 16 weeks.
Treated Set (TS) includes all patients in randomized set (RS) who were treated with at least 1 dose of the trial regimen (including both trial drug and computerized cognitive training (CCT)).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | BI 425809 10 mg + Computerized Cognitive Training | Patients administered once daily (in the morning) two tablets of 5 milligram (mg) of BI 425809 (total BI 425809 dose= 10 mg) orally for 12 weeks. Concomitantly patients received non-pharmacological adjunctive computerized cognitive training (CCT). | 0 | 99 | 1 | 99 | 9 | 99 |
| EG001 | Placebo + Computerized Cognitive Training | Patients administered once daily (in the morning) two tablets of Placebo matching BI 425809 5 milligram (mg) orally for 12 weeks. Concomitantly patients received non-pharmacological adjunctive computerized cognitive training (CCT). | 0 | 101 | 2 | 101 | 16 | 101 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 25.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 25.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 25.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 25.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Delirium | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 25.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 25.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 25.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 25.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 25.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) acknowledges that investigators have the right to publish the study results. Investigators shall provide BI with a copy of any publication or presentation for review prior to any submission. Such review will be done with regard to proprietary information, information related to patentable inventions, medical, scientific, and statistical accuracy within 60 days. BI may request a delay of the publication in order to protect BI's intellectual property rights.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boehringer Ingelheim, Call Center | Boehringer Ingelheim | 1-800-243-0127 | clintriage.rdg@boehringer-ingelheim.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 10, 2022 | Oct 16, 2023 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012559 | Schizophrenia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019967 | Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000634404 | BI 425809 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
| Other |
| OG001 | Placebo + Computerized Cognitive Training | Patients administered once daily (in the morning) two tablets of Placebo matching BI 425809 5 milligram (mg) orally for 12 weeks. Concomitantly patients received non-pharmacological adjunctive computerized cognitive training (CCT). |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo + Computerized Cognitive Training | Patients administered once daily (in the morning) two tablets of Placebo matching BI 425809 5 milligram (mg) orally for 12 weeks. Concomitantly patients received non-pharmacological adjunctive computerized cognitive training (CCT). |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Placebo + Computerized Cognitive Training | Patients administered once daily (in the morning) two tablets of Placebo matching BI 425809 5 milligram (mg) orally for 12 weeks. Concomitantly patients received non-pharmacological adjunctive computerized cognitive training (CCT). |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|