(Cost)-Effectiveness of Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Regular Punch Biopsy in the Diagnosis and Subtyping of Basal Cell Carcinoma: a Multi Center Randomized Non-inferiority Trial
(Cost)-Effectiveness of Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Regular Punch Biopsy in the Diagnosis and Subtyping of Basal Cell Carcinoma: a Multi Center Randomized Non-inferiority Trial
A multi-centre randomized non-inferiority trial investigating the (cost-)effectiveness of Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) versus regular punch biopsy in the diagnosis and subtyping of Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC).
Skin cancer incidence rises worldwide due to high sun exposure and ageing. Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most prevalent form, with a lifetime risk of 16-20% in the Netherlands. Currently, the gold standard for diagnosing and subtyping BCC is a punch biopsy. Since this technique is invasive, new non-invasive diagnostic methods have been developed, including optical coherence tomography (OCT). In patients with clinical and dermoscopic suspicion of BCC, OCT makes it possible to confirm and subtype BCC with high confidence, thereby obviating the need for a punch biopsy in a substantial part of patients. Hence, BCC diagnosis and treatment can be accomplished in one day. As a result, patients experience less distress and costs can be saved. By discussing diagnosis and treatment with the patient directly, care can be provided more efficiently, preventing treatment delay and saving extra hospital visits. The investigators hypothesize that the use of OCT is a cost-effective strategy when compared to regular care (always punch biopsy). However, it is important to evaluate whether an alternative OCT guided diagnostic approach does not lead to an unacceptable increase in risk of recurrent BCC.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: