Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH) | OTHER |
| Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Evaluation the efficacy and safety of collagen dermal filler with lidocaine using in the middle to deep dermis for the correction of nasolabial folds.
This is a prospective, randomized, active-controlled, double blinded (blinded evaluator and subject), multicenter clinical trial, which will be performed in Tri-Service General Hospital, Linkou ChangGung Memorial Hospital and National Taiwan University Hospital. These hospitals will recruit subjects in a competitive way. 240 subjects will be recruited in total, and each hospital will recruit 60~120 subjects. The expected execution period is 2018/10~2021/06. Subjects will be randomly assigned to receive the investigational device "Sumax FULLSGEN with Lidocaine" or controlled device "Sumax FACIALGAIN collagen Implant with Lidocaine" in 1:1 ratio. These devices will be processed to keep subjects and evaluators blinded.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunmax FULLSGEN with Lidocaine | Experimental | A subject would only receive single injection treatment(day 1) using Sunmax FULLSGEN , and there would be 6 follow-up visits at 4th, 12th, 24th, 36th and 52nd week after injection treatment. |
|
| Sumax FACIALGAIN collagen Implant with Lidocaine | Active Comparator | A subject would only receive single injection treatment(day 1) using Sumax FACIALGAIN collagen Implant with Lidocaine, and there would be 6 follow-up visits at 4th, 12th, 24th, 36th and 52nd week after injection treatment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunmax FULLSGEN with Lidocaine | Device | Subject who voluntarily sign the informed consent form (day -14~1) will be randomly assigned to investigational or control group and have intradermal allergy test. After the injection treatment by randomly choosing the device, every subject would have 6 follow-up visits. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| WSRS score evaluation | 24th week response rate will be calculated according to WSRS score assessed by the evaluators Subtract the subject's WSRS baseline score from the Xth week after injection as improved score. | 24th week. Using the 5-grade Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) to evaluate wrinkle, and score 5 is the worst one. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| WSRS score evaluation within 4 time point as assessed by the evaluators | WSRS response rate at 4th, 12th, 36th and 52nd week as assessed by the evaluators | 4th, 12th, 36th and 52nd week week. Using the 5-grade Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) to evaluate wrinkle, and score 5 is the worst one. |
| GAIS score at specific week as assessed by the subject |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Endpoint (Evaluation of laboratory inspection values.) | Evaluation of laboratory inspection values. | One year. Number of participants with abnormal laboratory values and/or adverse events that are related to treatment. |
| Safety Endpoint (Evaluation of the percentage of AE and AR) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Taiwan University Hospital | Taipei | Taiwan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
240 subjects will be recruited in total, and each hospital will recruit 60~120 subjects.
Not provided
Not provided
This is a double blinded( blinded evaluator and subject) clinical trial.
|
|
GAIS score at 4th, 12th, 24th, 36th and 52nd week as assessed by the subject |
| 4th, 12th, 24th, 36th and 52nd week. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) is scored 5 level of improvement. Score 5 is the worst value. |
| GAIS score at specific week as assessed by the evaluators | GAIS score at 4th, 12th, 24th, 36th and 52nd week as assessed by the evaluators | 4th, 12th, 24th, 36th and 52nd week. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) is scored 5 level of improvement. Score 5 is the worst value. |
| VAS score evaluation | VAS score within 30 mins after injection as assessed by the subject | 30 minutes. Double-sided print or photocopy the next 2 diagrams ensuring that the lines are exactly 10 cm in length and superimposed. |
| TPS score evaluation | TPS score within 30 mins after injection as assessed by the investigator | 30 minutes. The score is evaluated by thermometer pain scale, and the scale is 0-10. 0 stands for on pain, and 10 stands for worst possible pain. |
Evaluation of the percentage of AE and AR |
| One year. Number of participants with AE divided by number of participants with AR is the percentage of AE and AR. |