Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background Cranial reconstruction after monocortical bonegraft harvesting remains a clinical challenge for the maxillofacial surgeon. At present, there is no gold standard technique advised. Patient-specific implants are gaining terrain in the field of craniofacial reconstruction. Comparative studies on differences in success rates between different biomaterials for application in craniofacial surgery are lacking.
Aims The primary objective is to evaluate, in terms of cosmetic result, the postoperative successful outcome of patient-standardized implants for cranial reconstruction after bonegraft harvesting for jaw augmentation of patients with severely atrophic jaw.
Design Patients considered eligible for cranial bone-augmentation of the severely atrophic jaw, that provide their consent for participation in the trial, will be randomized at recruitment into either the patient-specific implant (P) or cement (C) group. In the P group, the cranial bone defect will be reconstructed with a patient-specific implant (KLS Martin, Tuttlingen, Germany). In the C group, the cranial bone defect will be reconstructed with HydrosetTM (Stryker, New Jersey, USA), calcium phosphate cement, according to the current standard practice at the department.
Parameters representing ease of application of the biomaterial , postoperative complication rate, cosmetic and functional outcome will be measured at fixed time-points during surgery and postoperative follow-up. A cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan of both the donor (cranium) and receptor site (jaw) will be taken preoperatively, within 10 days postop, and 6 months post-operatively to measure biomaterial positioning.
Conclusions Systematic reviews demonstrate the need for randomized prospective studies regarding implantable biomaterials used in facial reconstructive surgery. We hypothesize that patient-specific implants provide more user-friendly alternatives to the standard care, with better cosmetic results.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| C group | Active Comparator | In the C group, the cranial bone defect will be reconstructed with HydrosetTM (Stryker, New Jersey, USA), calcium phosphate cement, according to the current standard practice at the department. |
|
| P group | Experimental | In the P group, the cranial bone defect will be reconstructed with a patient-specific implant (KLS Martin, Tuttlingen, Germany). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| patient-specific implant | Device | solid titanium implant that functions as a guiding template for harvesting, and as an implant for reconstruction of the cranial defect |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| volumetric measurement of cranial defect, through superimposition of the preoperative and postoperative cone beam computed tomography | within 10 days postoperative |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ease of application of both biomaterials, as graded with a 0 to 10 VAS score by the treating physician | perioperative | |
| ease of application of both biomaterials, as determined by surgical time required | perioperative |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Neyt, MD | maxillofacial department, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department MKA, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV | Bruges | Belgium |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001840 | Dental Bonding |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003813 | Dentistry |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
single-blind
| cement | Device | norian cement for reconstruction of the cranial defect |
|
| postoperative complications, as graded by CTCAE 4.0 by the treating surgeon | within 30 days postoperative |
| patient satisfaction, as graded with a 0 to 10 VAS score | within 30 days postop |
| postoperative complications, as graded by CTCAE 4.0 by the treating surgeon | at 6 months postop |
| patient satisfaction, as graded with a 0 to 10 VAS score | at 6 months postop |
| final implant position, as determined with CBCT | at 6 months postop |