Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
While lung cancer are rare disease in the early 20th century, its incidence increased in parallel with the increase in smoking habits. It is the most common type of cancer in the world. Despite advances in the efficacy of chemotherapy and radiotherapy regimens, surgical resection is the most effective curative treatment modality to improve survival in non-small cell lung cancer. Pulmonary resection candidates are selected according to not only tumor type and stage, but also functional status, exercise capacity, underlying lung disorders and health-related quality of life assessments. Patients with lung cancer often have lung and heart comorbidities that affect the outcome of the outcome measures and restricts cancer treatment options. In patients with lung cancer, shortness of breath, physical inactivity, weakness in peripheral muscles and exercise intolerance are described. Pulmonary rehabilitation is a multidisciplinary treatment designed to improve exercise capacity, functional status, health-related quality of life and to reduce the attenuation of chronic shortness of breath and fatigue in patients with chronic lung problems.
In literature, the effect of surgery in patients with lung cancer on postoperative respiratory muscle strength is not clear. There is no study investigating the effect of chemotherapy and radiotherapy on respiratory muscle strength. For these reasons, the aim of the study was to evaluate the curative period of non-small cell lung cancer patients with reliability and validity assessment methods. The hypothesis of our study was; when compared with patients with lung cancer and healthy individuals, exercise capacity, respiratory and peripheral muscle strength, physical activity levels, sleep and quality of life of lung cancer patients are reduced; dyspnoea, fatigue, depression, cough and pain levels increase.
According to sample size calculation 20 lung with complete remission cancer patients and 20 healthy individuals were included in the study. Cross-sectional observational research. The demographic, physical and physiological characteristics were recorded from the patient files. Exercise capacity (using cardiopulmonary exercise testing), physical activity, pulmonary functions, respiratory and peripheral muscle strength, dyspnea and fatigue perception, depression, cough, pain and quality of life were evaluated. Primary outcome measurement is maximal exercise capacity. Secondary outcomes are respiratory and peripheral muscle strength, pulmonary functions, physical activity, dyspnea and fatigue perception, depression, cough, pain and quality of life.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | Maximal exercise capacity was assessed using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), exercise capacity six minute walk test, physical activity multi-sensor activity monitor, pulmonary function spirometry, respiratory muscle strength mouth pressure device, peripheral muscle strength hand held dynamometer, dyspnea Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (MMRC), fatigue Fatigue Severity Scale, quality of life The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung cancer quality of life questionnaire (FACT-L), depression Montgomery Asberg Depression scale, sleep of quality Pittsburgh Sleep Quality index and cough using Leicester Cough Questionnaire were evaluated. | ||
| Healthy controls | Maximal exercise capacity was assessed using cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), exercise capacity six minute walk test, physical activity multi-sensor activity monitor, pulmonary function spirometry, respiratory muscle strength mouth pressure device, peripheral muscle strength hand held dynamometer, dyspnea Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (MMRC), fatigue Fatigue Severity Scale, quality of life The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung cancer quality of life questionnaire (FACT-L), depression Montgomery Asberg Depression scale, sleep of quality Pittsburgh Sleep Quality index and cough using Leicester Cough Questionnaire were evaluated. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Maximal exercise capacity | Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (Oxygen consumption measurement during test). | Second day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Functional exercise capacity | The six-minute walking test (6-MWT) was used to evaluate submaximal exercise capacity. | First day |
| Physical activity | Physical activity will be evaluated multi sensor activity monitor for 2 consecutive days. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
20 patients with lung cancer were included in the patients group and 20 healthy individuals were included in the control group
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Zeynep Pelin Dündar, MSc | Gazi University | Study Chair |
| Meral Boşnak Güçlü, Assoc. Prof | Gazi University | Study Director |
| Aydın Çiltaş, MD | Gebze Medical Park Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Mustafa Benekli, MD | Cukurambar/Ankara | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation | Yenimahalle | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26342839 | Result | Cavalheri V, Jenkins S, Cecins N, Gain K, Phillips M, Sanders LH, Hill K. Impairments after curative intent treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a comparison with age and gender-matched healthy controls. Respir Med. 2015 Oct;109(10):1332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Aug 29. | |
| 26264470 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008175 | Lung Neoplasms |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| D004417 | Dyspnea |
| D003863 | Depression |
| D005221 | Fatigue |
| D003371 | Cough |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
| D013899 | Thoracic Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| First day |
| Pulmonary function test | This test was evaluated using a spirometry by which is evaluated dynamic lung functions expressed as percentages of expected values. | First day |
| Inspiratory and Expiratory muscle strength (MIP, MEP) | Respiratory muscle strength was evaluated with a mouth pressure device | First day |
| Peripheral muscle strength | Peripheral muscle strength was evaluated with a hand-held dynamometer. | First day |
| Dyspnea | The severity of dyspnea during daily living activities was evaluated using the Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnea scale. Dyspnea is graded as follows: zero (dyspnea only with strenuous exercise), one (dyspnea when hurrying or walking up a slight hill), two (walks slower than people of the same age due to dyspnea or having to stop for breath when walking at own pace), three (stops for breath after walking 100 yards or after a few minutes) and four (too dyspneic to leave house or breathless when dressing). The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is 1 unit for the MMRC dyspnea scale. | First day |
| Fatigue Severity | The Turkish version of Fatigue Severity Scale, which is a valid and reliable test, was performed to the recipients for evaluation of fatigue severity. Self-administered questionnaire is comprised of nine questions. The average score is identified on seven-point scale. Patients select a number from 1 to 7 for each 9 questions which demonstrates from strong disagreement to strong agreement, respectively. The cut-off score for fatigue severity is 36 according to this scale, if the total score obtained from this scale is higher than 36, the recipient is defined as severe fatigue. | First day |
| Life Quality | Quality of life was measured using Turkish version of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 version 3.0 (EORTCQLQ) which is widely used as health related quality of life questionnaire in cancer patients. The cancer-specific questionnaire has 30 questions and incorporates five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status and several single items. All item scores are transformed to 0-100. Higher values indicate higher functional/healthy level in functional scales, a higher quality of life level in global health status and increased symptoms in symptom scales. | First day |
| Depression | Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (Turkish version of scale) This assessment tool contains 10 items with a score from 0 to 6, thus the maximum score is 60. A higher score indicates a more severe depression. | First day |
| Sleep of quality | Sleep quality of the individuals was evaluated with the Turkish version of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. It is an individual evaluation scale that evaluates sleep quality and sleep disturbance in the last one month period. | First day |
| Cough | The Turkish version of the Leicester Cough Scale (LÖQ) was used to assess the health-related quality of life of individuals with chronic cough. The scale evaluates chronic cough consisting of 19 items, including physical (8 items), psychosocial (7 items) and social (4 items) subsections. Each item is scored between 1 (always) and 7 (never). The total score is 3-21 points. The high scores obtained from this questionnaire, which evaluates the effect of the symptoms that have been going on for the last two weeks, show less impact on cough and lower scores indicate more impact. | First day |
| Life Quality | Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung cancer Quality of life questionnaire (Turkish version) is used to assess the quality of life of lung cancer patients from many cultures all over the world. It is an individual applied scale and consists of 36 questions specific to lung cancer. Body is a scale consisting of 5 subsections including status, social life and family situation, emotional state, activity status and other concerns. | Second day |
| Granger CL, Denehy L, Parry SM, Martin J, Dimitriadis T, Sorohan M, Irving L. Which field walking test should be used to assess functional exercise capacity in lung cancer? An observational study. BMC Pulm Med. 2015 Aug 12;15:89. doi: 10.1186/s12890-015-0075-2. |
| 26869579 | Result | Cavalheri V, Jenkins S, Cecins N, Gain K, Hill K. Comparison of the six-minute walk test with a cycle-based cardiopulmonary exercise test in people following curative intent treatment for non-small cell lung cancer. Chron Respir Dis. 2016 May;13(2):118-27. doi: 10.1177/1479972316631137. Epub 2016 Feb 11. |
| 26597694 | Result | Granger CL, Parry SM, Edbrooke L, Denehy L. Deterioration in physical activity and function differs according to treatment type in non-small cell lung cancer - future directions for physiotherapy management. Physiotherapy. 2016 Sep;102(3):256-63. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Oct 23. |
| 24703523 | Result | Arbane G, Douiri A, Hart N, Hopkinson NS, Singh S, Speed C, Valladares B, Garrod R. Effect of postoperative physical training on activity after curative surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy. 2014 Jun;100(2):100-7. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.12.002. Epub 2014 Feb 12. |
| 27913735 | Result | Hashmi A, Baciewicz FA Jr, Soubani AO, Gadgeel SM. Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation for marginal-function lung cancer patients. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2017 Jan;25(1):47-51. doi: 10.1177/0218492316683757. Epub 2016 Dec 5. |
| D008171 |
| Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| D012818 | Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |