Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the study is to assess the use of a wound dressing system called PICO7Y following a two-sided breast surgery. PICO7Y is a new dressing system made to treat two incisions/wounds at the same time, and the purpose of this study is to check how the dressing is working by looking at data on how well the dressing performs while you wear it and to check if doctors and patients are happy with it.
PICO7Y is based on another dressing called PICO.
It is thought that Negative Pressure Wound Therapy may have numerous mechanisms of action when used to manage surgical incisions, including reducing oedema, stimulating perfusion and managing exudate. Post-operative oedema in the peri-wound tissue is thought to limit tissue perfusion and high levels of wound fluid loss have been correlated with increased risk of post-operative infection and dehiscence23. Application of NPWT to the closed wound has been reported to improve patient comfort through reduced dressing changes and to lessen the period during which post-operative fluid discharges from the incision. Xia et al (2014)24 demonstrated that in 20 patients with infected wounds, NPWT resulted in significantly increased blood flow in the wounds when compared to pre application levels. In a study by Young et al (2013)25 four patients with pressure ulcers had oedema and wound bed thickness assessed during follow-up. They demonstrated a rapid reduction of peri-wound tissue oedema over four days and a 20% increase in the thickness of the wound bed by seven days of therapy.
Risk factors such as smoking and obesity have shown to increase complications follow oncoplastic surgery26 and it is possible that such populations could benefit more from the application of the NPWT. Furthermore there are a number of bilateral or multi wound indications where provision of a single device with the Y connection may represent a cost saving to the healthcare system. However, ultimately the use of NPWT for oncoplastic breast surgery closed incisions will be judged on whether it can increase the healing success rate while minimising complications. Holt and Murphy (2015)27 assessed the use of PICO single use NPWT system when applied to 24 patients with closed incisions following therapeutic resection. The contralateral breast underwent simultaneous symmetrising breast reduction with standard care dressings applied allowing for direct comparison. Although the cohort was too small to draw meaningful statistical conclusions they noted a lower incidence of wound breakdown (4.2% vs. 16.7%) and shorter time to healing (10.7 days vs. 16.1 days) in the NPWT group. However, this difference was partly attributed to the more extensive and complex nature of the therapeutic surgery. Similarly in a category of patients undergoing breast surgery with primary wound closure, Pellino et al (2014)19 showed significantly lower surgical site events when treated with PICO.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| PICO7Y | Experimental | PICO 7Y is a single-use NPWT System consisting of a small portable pump & pump clip, 2 AA batteries, 2 large multisite dressings, 2 extension tubes and secondary fixation strips. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PICO7Y | Device | The PICO 7Y pump maintains NPWT at -80 mmHg (nominal) to two wound surfaces simultaneously. Exudate is managed by the dressings through a combination of absorption and evaporation of moisture through the outer film. The PICO 7Y kit is intended to be used for up to 7 days on low exuding wounds. For moderately exuding wounds the system is intended to be used for up to 4 days without a dressing change. For 7 days use on moderately exuding wounds additional dressings will be supplied. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical performance PICO 7Y NPWT system within 7 days of surgery | To assess clinical performance of the PICO 7Y NPWT system through its capacity to deliver negative pressure consistently at -80 mmHg, to both the reconstructed breast and the contralateral breast, during a period of 7 days. This will be measured by assessing the incision wound on Day 7, using CDC wound assessment criteria. Photographs will also be taken of the incision wound with treatment and after treatment. | within 7 days of surgery |
| Clinical performance PICO 7Y NPWT system | To assess clinical performance of the PICO 7Y NPWT system through its capacity to deliver negative pressure consistently at -80 mmHg, to both the reconstructed breast and the contralateral breast, during a period of 7 days. This will be measured by assessing the incision wound on Day 14 using CDC wound assessment criteria. Photographs will also be taken of the incision wound with treatment and after treatment. | within 14 days of surgery |
| Clinical performance PICO 7Y NPWT system within 30 days of surgery | To assess clinical performance of the PICO 7Y NPWT system through its capacity to deliver negative pressure consistently at -80 mmHg, to both the reconstructed breast and the contralateral breast, during a period of 7 days. This will be measured by assessing the incision wound on Day 30, using CDC wound assessment criteria. Photographs will also be taken of the incision wound with treatment and after treatment. | within 30 days of surgery |
| Safety of the PICO7Y NPWT system through number of Adverse Events, Device Deficiencies and Serious Adverse Events. | Safety will be assessed by reporting any Adverse Events or Device deficiencies, and any Serious adverse events. | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of successful healing at day 30 | via photographs of the wound incision taken at Day 0, Day 14, and Day 30 | up to Day 30 |
| Clinician Acceptability | Assessed with the electronic Case Report Forms, questioning the clinician's acceptability of the device |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| John Murphy, MBChB | Oncoplastic Breast Surgeon | Principal Investigator |
| Brian Gilchrist, PhD | Smith & Nephew - Global Clinical Strategy | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Academic Hospital Maastricht | Maastricht | 6229 | Netherlands | |||
| Queen Elizabeth Hospital |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 1 year |
| Patient Acceptability | Assessed with the electronic Case Report Forms, questioning the patient's acceptability of the device | 1 year |
| Ease of Application | Assessed with electronic Case Report Forms, questioning ease of application as well as questionnaires given to the participants. | 1 year |
| Comfort | Assessing patient comfort during wear by measuring the Visual Analogue Score at day 0 and day 7. | up to Day 7 |
| Ease of Removal | Assessed with electronic Case Report forms, questioning ease of removal as well as questionnaire. | 1 year |
| Dressing Wear Time | Assessed with electronic Case Report Forms as well as patient-facing questionnaires. | 1 year |
| Incidence of Surgical Site Complications | This will be measured by assessing the incision wound with CDC criteria at Day 0 to Day 30. | up to Day 30 |
| Evaluate change in health-related quality of life | Assessed by using EQ-5D 5L questionnaires at Day 0, Day 14 and Day 30. | up to Day 30 |
| Birmingham |
| B15 2TH |
| United Kingdom |
| Royal Free Hospital | London | NW3 2QG | United Kingdom |
| Whythenshawe Hospital | Manchester | M23 9LT | United Kingdom |
| Nottingham Breast Institute | Nottingham | NG5 1PB | United Kingdom |