Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The efficacy of guided self-help based on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) to reduce subjective sense of stress will be investigated in a randomised controlled trial with two condition: 1) ACT-based self-help, and 2) Wait-list control. The outcome at the end of the treatment (week 10) and 6-month follow-up will be assessed. The wail-list condition will be offered ACT-based self-help after the post-assessment.
The efficacy of guided self-help based on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) to reduce subjective sense of stress will be investigated in a randomised controlled trial with two condition: 1) ACT-based self-help, and 2) Wait-list control. The outcome at the end of the treatment and 6-month follow-up will be assessed. The wail-list condition will be offered ACT-based self-help after 10 weeks (i.e. when the post-assessment is completed). Inclusion criteria are: Adults with a score above 14 on the stress sub scale of the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS) at screening, a score below 10 on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), no indication of suicidality on the PHQ-9, and no ongoing psychotherapeutic interventions, and no previous work with the self-help manual that has been published as a self-help book.
A total of 140 participants will be recruited and randomised, using services on www.random.org. Informed consent will be obtained from all the participants ahead of screening. Participants will be asked to respond to the following questionnaires at pre-, post and follow-up assessments: Perceived Stress Scale-14 (PSS-14), General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Shirom Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM), and Brunnsviken Brief Quality of Life Inventory (BBQ). Initially, they will also be asked to respond to the credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ).
At the end of the intervention (week 10), participants will also be asked to respond to the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ), and the Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ).
The following two scales will be used to study mediators: Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-2 (AAQ-2), and Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), assess at pre-treatment, as well as at third and fifth week of treatment, at post-assessment (10 weeks later), and at the 6 months follow-up. A number of moderators, including demographics, will also be investigated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guided self-help based on ACT | Experimental | Participants follow a self-help program and receive weekly support by trained facilitators |
|
| Wait-list control | No Intervention | Participants are informed that they will receive the intervention after the 6-month follow-up assessment |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guided self-help based on ACT | Behavioral | ACT-based self-help book and regular support by trained facilitators |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived Stress Scale-14 (PSS-14) | The PSS-14 is measure of stress. Its total score ranges from 0-56. Lower values represent a better outcome. | Pre-assessment, week 3 and 5 of intervention, post-assessment (week10), and 6 months follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) | The PHQ-9 provides a measure of depressive symptomatology. It ranges from 0-27. Lower values represent a better outcome | Pre- and post-assessment (10 weeks later) as well as 6 months follow-up |
| General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ) | To measure the perceived credibility of the intervention as well as expectations. It has two subscales; 1) expectancy, and 2) credibility. The individual items are first standardized and then summed up in each subscale. Higher values represent a better outcome. | Pre-assessment |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ata Ghaderi, PhD | Professor | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolinska Institutet | Solna | 17177 | Sweden |
Unidentified data will be made available to other researchers upon request.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Randomization into active treatment versus a wait-list control group
Not provided
Not provided
Given the nature of the intervention, and self-report as a main strategy for outcome assessment, nor masking is possible or necessary.
Not provided
The GAD-7 is used to measure anxiety. It ranges from 0-21. Lower values represent a better outcome. |
| Pre- and post-assessment (10 weeks later) as well as 6 months follow-up |
| Brunnsviken Brief Quality of Life Inventory (BBQ) | The BBQ is a Swedish measure of quality of life. It ranges from 0-96. Higher values represent a better outcome. | Pre- and post-assessment (10 weeks later) as well as 6 months follow-up |
| Shirom Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM) | The SMBM provides a measure of burn-out. It has three sub-scales: 1) physical exhaustion, 2) cognitive fatigue, and 3) emotional exhaustion. The subscales are combined to compute a total score by summing the mean of the subscales. Scale ranges from 3-15. Higher values represent a better outcome. | Pre- and post-assessment (10 weeks later) as well as 6 months follow-up |
| Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-2 (AAQ-2) | To Measure psychological flexibility (mediator of change). It ranges from 7-49. Lower values represent a better outcome. | Pre-assessment, week 3 and 5 of intervention, post-assessment (week10), and 6 months follow-up |
| Mindful Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) | To measure mindfulness (potential mediator of change). The score is computed by the mean of the 15 items and the resulting scale ranges from 1-6. Higher values represent a better outcome. | Pre-assessment, week 3 and 5 of intervention, post-assessment (week10), and 6 months follow-up |
| Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) | To measure satisfaction and dissatisfaction with the intervention. It ranges from 8-32. Higher values indicate higher satisfaction. | Post-assessment, and 6 month follow-up |
| Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ) | To identify iatrogenic events. It ranges from 0-128. Lower values represent a better outcome (i.e. fewer negative effects from the intervention). | Post-assessment, and 6 month follow-up |