Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy Between Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Balloon Dilation Catheter (DIOR) and Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon (Bingo) in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial (BEYOND II)
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy Between Paclitaxel-Eluting Coronary Balloon Dilation Catheter (DIOR) and Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon (Bingo) in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial (BEYOND II)
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel-eluting coronary artery balloon dilation catheter (DIOR) in revascularization of coronary bifurcation lesions compared with paclitaxel-eluting balloon (Bingo), and to provide the clinical data for the formal application in China and for the approvement of China marketing.
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomize, control and non-inferior study. 220 patients with bifurcation lesions will be randomized 1:1 to each group. after the main branch has been treated successfully, and if the side branch's stenosis is more than 70% and can be pre-dilated by POBA (plain old balloon angioplasty) successfully, then randomizing. the patients in the study group will be treated with paclitaxel-eluting coronary artery balloon dilatation catheter (DIOR), while those in the control group will be treated with paclitaxel-eluting balloon (Bingo). Clinical follow-up will be conducted at baseline, operation, hospital discharge, 1 month, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months after operation, and angiographic follow-up will be conducted at 9 months. The primary endpoint is late lumen loss (LLL) in the balloon dilatation coverage area of side branch of at 9 month after operation. The secondary endpoints include device success, clinical success, target lesion failure (TLF), target lesion revascularization (TLR), clinical composite endpoints and imaging endpoints. The information of adverse events, serious adverse events and device defects will be collected during the study.
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects that participate in this study must fulfill all the following criteria:
General inclusion criteria:
Angiographic inclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
If subjects fulfill any of below criteria, this subject shall be exclude from this study.
General exclusion criteria:
Angiographic exclusion criteria
1) Residual stenosis (DS %) is ≤50% (visually); 2) TIMI Grade-3 flow ((visually); 3) No angiographic complications (e.g., no-reflow, distal embolization, side branch closure) 4) No dissections NHLBI grade C-F;
wangbindl@hotmail.com86-024-28851120
wanggeng69@163.com86-024-28851120
Shengyang, Liaoning, China
hanyaling@263.net86-024-28851120
Shengyang, Liaoning, China
86-024-83283166
yaxin_suxi@163.com86-027-65796888
chmengx@126.com86-025-52271351
wanggeng69@163.com86-024-28851120
fugs@medmail.com.cn86-0571-86090073
wangjianan@medmail.com.cn86-0571-87783777
86-021-38804518
hongliangcong@163.com86-022-88185003