Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with stroke have demonstrated abnormal muscle tone and postural control ability which affect their ambulation, activity of daily living and confident. Nowadays, utilizing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and robotic machines to assist walking training for stroke patients has been applied to clinic widely. While less studies have compared intervention efficacy for stroke patients between rTMS and robotic training. This study aimed to compare effect of rTMS and robotic training for lower-extremity function and gait in stroke patients.
This study will include subjects occurring stroke within 3 months. All groups will receive traditional rehabilitation. The subjects will be allocated randomly in three groups which are traditional rehabilitation (Group A), robotic training (Group B), and rTMS (Group C) respectively, with 35 people per group. The group B will be intervened 5 times per week and the group C will receive 10 times rTMS intervention during 4 weeks. At post-intervention and eighth weeks after intervention, basic examination will be executed including basic information, history, Mini-mental State examination, Short -Form 36, Modified Ashworth Scale, Fugl-Meyer assessment, static and dynamic motion examination, ultrasound assessment and examination of cardiorespiratory. Two-way mixed ANOVA will be used to analyze the differences of three groups and times.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| repetitive TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) | Experimental | rTMS and physical / occupational therapy |
|
| robotic GT (Gait Training) | Experimental | robotic gait training for 20 times and physical / occupational therapy |
|
| traditional rehabilitation | No Intervention | patient only received traditional rehabilitation program |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| repetitive TMS | Device | rTMS x 10 times |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change of walking speed | walk 6m to measure the time spent, patients can walk with foot orthosis and assistive devices | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of postural sway displacement | Use computerized dynography to measure the postural sway displacement (mm) | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of postural sway velocity | Use computerized dynography to measure the postural sway velocity (mm/s) | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of postural sway area | computerized dynography to measure the postural sway area (mm^2) | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of step time | Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: step time (ms) | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of stance time |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change of concentration of Serum albumin | The concentration of Serum albumin in the blood test. Albumin is the most important contributor to the maintenance of plasma colloid oncotic pressure; deficiency results in edema.because of physical health problems; (3) bodily pain, (4) social functioning, (5) general mental health (psychological distress and psychological wellbeing), (6) role limitations because of emotional problems, (7) vitality (energy/fatigue), (8) general health perceptions. Scoring: answers to each question are scored which are then summed and transformed to a 0 - 100 scale. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PangTa Liu | Contact | 886-4-7238595 | 7427 | 105546@cch.org.tw |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ta-Sen Wei, Doctor | Changhua Christian Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Changhua Christian Hospital | Recruiting | Changhua | 500 | Taiwan |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12098151 | Background | Brunt D, Greenberg B, Wankadia S, Trimble MA, Shechtman O. The effect of foot placement on sit to stand in healthy young subjects and patients with hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jul;83(7):924-9. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.3324. | |
| 3578493 | Background | Dettmann MA, Linder MT, Sepic SB. Relationships among walking performance, postural stability, and functional assessments of the hemiplegic patient. Am J Phys Med. 1987 Apr;66(2):77-90. |
Not provided
Not provided
only for research
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D009128 | Muscle Spasticity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| robotic GT |
| Device |
robotic gait training for 20 times |
|
Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: stance time (ms) |
| baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of swing time | Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: swing time (ms) | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of single support time | Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: single support time (ms) | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of double support time | Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: double support time (ms) | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of step length | Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: step distance (mm) | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of stance length | Use computerized dynography to measure spatial gait parameter: stance distance (mm) | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of amplitude of Muscle activity | use electromyography to measure the muscles activity in microvolts (uv) included quadriceps, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius during subject walking in self selected speed in 6 meters. | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of Functional Independence Measure (FIM) | FIM™ is comprised of 18 items, grouped into 2 subscales - motor and cognition. The motor subscale includes: Eating Grooming Bathing Dressing, upper body Dressing, lower body Toileting Bladder management Bowel management Transfers - bed/chair/wheelchair Transfers - toilet Transfers - bath/shower Walk/wheelchair Stairs The cognition subscale includes: Comprehension Expression Social interaction Problem solving Memory Each item is scored on a 7 point ordinal scale, ranging from a score of 1 to a score of 7. The higher the score, the more independent the patient is in performing the task associated with that item. The total score for the FIM motor subscale will be a value between 13 and 91. The total score for the FIM cognition subscale will be a value between 5 and 35. The total score for the FIM instrument will be a value between 18 and 126. | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of international Quality of Life Assessment Short Form -36 (SF-36) | including 8 health concepts: (1) physical functioning, (2) role limitations because of physical health problems; (3) bodily pain, (4) social functioning, (5) general mental health (psychological distress and psychological wellbeing), (6) role limitations because of emotional problems, (7) vitality (energy/fatigue), (8) general health perceptions. Scoring: answers to each question are scored which are then summed and transformed to a 0 - 100 scale. | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of concentration of Hemoglobin (Hb) | The concentration of Hb in the blood test. | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of concentration of Glucose | The concentration of Glucose in the blood test. The Spot glucose measurement in epidermal interstitial fluid appears to be a promising alternative to capillary blood glucose estimation | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of concentration of Cholesterol | The concentration of Cholesterol in the blood test. | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of concentration of Triglyceride | The concentration of Triglyceride in the blood test. | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of Berg balance test (BBS) | Including 14 items which are scored on a 5 points scale (0-4). The degree of success in achieving each task is given a score of zero (unable) to four (independent), and the final measure is the sum of all of the scores. The item scores are summed, minimum score =0, maximum score = 56 | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) | Items are scored on a 3-point ordinal scale (0 = cannot perform; 1 = performs partially; 2 = performs fully) Maximum Score = 226 points The 5 domains assessed include, Motor function (Upper extremity maximum score = 66; Lower extremity maximum score = 34), Sensory function (maximum score = 24), Balance (maximum score = 14), Joint range of motion (maximum score = 44), Joint pain (maximum score = 44) | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of Body Mass Index (BMI) | (body weight) kg/(height) m*(height)m | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) | It is an 11-question measure that tests five areas of cognitive function: orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall, and language. The maximum score is 30. A score of 23 or lower is indicative of cognitive impairment. | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) | measures resistance during passive soft-tissue stretching, the score is ranged from 0-4 0: No increase in muscle tone
| baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| Change of Muscle tone | measure the muscle tone (kg/m) under muscle resting. Target muscles are quadriceps, hamstrings, anterior tibialis, gastrocnemius. | baseline: before intervention, 1st examination: finish the intervention(repetitiveTMS:10 times treatments(2weeks)；robotic GT:20 times treatments (4weeks)), 2nd examination: 7 weeks after intervention |
| 15940582 | Background | Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, Brady K. Advances in the understanding and treatment of stroke impairment using robotic devices. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005 Spring;12(2):22-35. doi: 10.1310/RYT5-62N4-CTVX-8JTE. |
| 23834634 | Background | Kakuda W, Abo M, Watanabe S, Momosaki R, Hashimoto G, Nakayama Y, Kiyama A, Yoshida H. High-frequency rTMS applied over bilateral leg motor areas combined with mobility training for gait disturbance after stroke: a preliminary study. Brain Inj. 2013;27(9):1080-6. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.794973. |
| 25488849 | Background | Kim J, Park JH, Yim J. Effects of respiratory muscle and endurance training using an individualized training device on the pulmonary function and exercise capacity in stroke patients. Med Sci Monit. 2014 Dec 5;20:2543-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.891112. |
| 18467648 | Background | Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Demott T, Moore JL, Roth HR. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke. 2008 Jun;39(6):1786-92. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.504779. Epub 2008 May 8. |
| 17079746 | Background | Israel JF, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, Hornby TG. Metabolic costs and muscle activity patterns during robotic- and therapist-assisted treadmill walking in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Phys Ther. 2006 Nov;86(11):1466-78. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050266. |
| 10472161 | Background | Kim P, Warren S, Madill H, Hadley M. Quality of life of stroke survivors. Qual Life Res. 1999 Jun;8(4):293-301. doi: 10.1023/a:1008927431300. |
| 16151035 | Background | Macko RF, Ivey FM, Forrester LW, Hanley D, Sorkin JD, Katzel LI, Silver KH, Goldberg AP. Treadmill exercise rehabilitation improves ambulatory function and cardiovascular fitness in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. 2005 Oct;36(10):2206-11. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000181076.91805.89. Epub 2005 Sep 8. |
| 16084820 | Background | Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Aug;86(8):1641-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.011. |
| 9149764 | Background | Nichols DS. Balance retraining after stroke using force platform biofeedback. Phys Ther. 1997 May;77(5):553-8. doi: 10.1093/ptj/77.5.553. |
| 21974983 | Background | Wang RY, Tseng HY, Liao KK, Wang CJ, Lai KL, Yang YR. rTMS combined with task-oriented training to improve symmetry of interhemispheric corticomotor excitability and gait performance after stroke: a randomized trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012 Mar-Apr;26(3):222-30. doi: 10.1177/1545968311423265. Epub 2011 Oct 5. |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D009122 | Muscle Hypertonia |
| D020879 | Neuromuscular Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |