Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To investigate whether the collagen-based MANTA vascular closure device (VCD) is superior to suture-based VCDs in preventing vascular access site complications in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
see summary
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| MANTA vascular closure device | Active Comparator | Arteriotomy closure with a collagen-based vascular closure device (MANTAâ„¢) |
|
| Suture based vascular closure device | Active Comparator | Arteriotomy closure with 2 or more suture-based vascular closure devices (ProGlide) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MANTA vascular closure device | Device | Collagen based vascular closure device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Composite rate of major- and minor vascular complications according to VARC-2 | The primary endpoint will consist of the composite of major- and minor vascular complications according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 at 30 days follow-up. | Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants with a Major Vascular Complication according to VARC-2 | total number of participants major vascular complications | Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up |
| Number of Participants with a Minor Vascular Complication according to VARC-2 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nicolas M Van Mieghem, MD, PhD | Erasmus Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam | Rotterdam | 3000 CA | Netherlands |
no sharing of individual data (no permission from participants. GDPR)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001024 | Aortic Valve Stenosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000082862 | Aortic Valve Disease |
| D006349 | Heart Valve Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Open label randomized trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Suture based vascular closure device | Device | Suture based vascular closure device (ProGlide) |
|
total number of participants minor vascular complications |
| Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up |
| All-cause death rate | A distinction between cardiac-, non-cardiac vascular and non-cardiovascular death will be made | Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up |
| Number of Participants with a major- or life threatening bleeding according to VARC-2 | total number of participants with major/life-threatening bleedings | Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up |
| Need for transfusions for access site related bleeding/complications | Total number of transfusions of RBC because of site-related bleeding | Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up |
| Number of Participants with vascular closure device failure | Failure of a closure device to achieve haemostasis at the arteriotomy site leading to alternative treatment (other than manual compression or adjunctive endovascular ballooning) | Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up |
| Time to hemostasis | After the use of a vascular closure device the time to hemostasis will be classified as immediate hemostasis, hemostasis after 5 minutes manual compression, hemostasis after 10 minutes manual compression, hemostasis after endovascular ballooning, hemostasis after endovascular intervention or hemostasis after surgical intervention | During the TAVI procedure |
| Total procedure time | The total procedural time in minutes will be compared between the two treatment arms | During the TAVI procedure |
| Number of Participants with a clinically relevant bleeding defined as BARC 2, 3 and 5 | Clinically relevant bleeding defined as BARC 2, 3 and 5 | Between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and 30 days follow-up |
| Length of hospital stay | The total length of hospital stay in days will be compared between the two treatment arms | Up to a maximum of 30 days after the TAVI procedure |
| D014694 |
| Ventricular Outflow Obstruction |