Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| ClinLogix. LLC | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance and safety of the Temporary Spur Stent System (TSS). The TSS is intended for use in conjunction with a commercially available drug coated balloon in the infrapopliteal arteries for the treatment of de novo or restenotic lesions.
This study is a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter, single arm trial, with sites in New Zealand, Germany, and Switzerland.
At least two and no more than 10 sites are expected to participate, with 100 subjects enrolled (no more than 40 at a single site).
The study follow up will take place over a period of 365 days. A vessel recoil substudy will be included for a select group of subjects.
The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the performance and safety of the Temporary Spur Stent System (TSS) for subjects with infrapopliteal arterial disease.
The Temporary Spur Stent System is intended for use in conjunction with a commercially available drug coated balloon in the infrapopliteal arteries for the treatment of de novo or restenotic lesions.
The TSS has been developed to provide another treatment option for patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD), and Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI).
Up to 100 subjects will be treated with the Temporary Spur Stent System in conjunction with an approved Drug Coated Balloon (DCB). No less than 1 subject and no more than 40 subjects will be enrolled at a single site.
A vessel recoil substudy is included in the trial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate vessel recoil in a select group of subjects (no more than 10 per site, up to 35 subjects in total). This will be conducted by obtaining measurements using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), Intravascular Ultrasound (IVUS), or Quantitative Vascular Analysis (QVA) of the target vessel during the index procedure.
The statistical analysis for this trial will use as a comparator a performance goal derived from a meta-analysis of infrapopliteal balloon angioplasty. Descriptive statistics may be used to describe other data points.
Subjects will be asked to participate in a baseline evaluation visit, the index procedure, a 30 day follow up visit, a 90 day follow up visit, a 180 day follow up visit, and a 365 day follow up visit. The baseline evaluation and index procedure visits may be combined. At each follow up visit, the subject will undergo a physical exam with wound evaluation (if applicable) including pictures, a medication history and compliance review, Ankle Brachial and Toe Brachial Indices (ABI and TBI), a duplex ultrasound of the treated limb, review of symptoms, and Adverse Events (AE) assessment. Subjects may choose to withdraw from the study at any time, for any reason. If subjects choose to withdraw, they will be asked to undergo an unscheduled study visit consisting of the aforementioned procedures.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment with TSS | Other | This is a single-arm study. Participating subjects will be treated with the Temporary Spur Stent System (TSS) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temporary Spur Stent System | Device | Participating subjects that meet inclusion and exclusion criteria will undergo treatment of infrapopliteal occlusions and stenoses with the Temporary Spur Stent System according to protocol guidelines |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary patency of treated lesion sites by duplex ultrasound in subjects who are free from clinically driven TLR (target lesion revascularization) | The primary performance endpoint will be primary patency of treated lesion sites by duplex ultrasound in subjects who are free from clinically driven TLR (target lesion revascularization). | 6 months |
| Freedom from device and procedure-related death through 30 days post-procedure | The primary safety endpoint is freedom from device and procedure-related death through 30 days post-procedure | 30 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 6 months post procedure. | The secondary efficacy endpoint is freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 6 months post procedure. | 6 months |
| Decrease in Rutherford class score at 3, 6 and 12 months. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent and able to comply with the study protocol.
Life expectancy >1 year in the investigator's opinion
Subject is > 18 years of age.
Subject is Rutherford class 3-5.
Stenotic, restenotic, or occlusive lesions located in the infrapopliteal vessels, with target lesion that can be successfully crossed with a guidewire.
Target lesion must meet lesion-specific criteria in pre-screening by angiography (pre-screening with CTA, MRA or selective angiography may be performed prior to the index procedure)
Target vessel(s) reconstitutes(s) at or above the medial malleolus, with the target treated segment extending no more than 10 mm beyond the medial malleolus.
Note: If the anterior tibial or posterior tibial arteries are treated, there must be inline flow to the foot.
If the peroneal artery is treated, there must be at least one collateral supplying the foot.
Target lesion must begin no higher than the tibioperoneal trifurcation (popliteal arteries excluded).
Target vessel reference diameter is measured to be between 2.0 mm to 4.5 mm in diameter, assessed by one of the following methods after successful completion of guidewire crossing of the lesion site:
Lesion length must be > 30 mm and < 150 mm.
Only one limb may be enrolled per subject. Up to two vessels may be treated per subject; if required, a second modality may be used for treatment in the non-target infrapopliteal vessel. Any treatment of the non-index vessel must be performed prior to the use of the investigative device and only one artery may be treated with the investigative device
The total treated segment is defined as the total length of artery treated with the investigational device. Target treatment length is <240 mm with a maximum segment of 150 mm separated by 30 mm of healthy tissue between treated lesions.
Successful pre-dilatation of the target lesion as outlined in the procedure instructions, defined as resulting in stenosis <50%, without resulting flow limiting dissection (Type D or greater), thrombus, or aneurysm by angiography prior to the insertion of the investigative device.
Iliac, SFA and popliteal inflow lesions can be treated using standard angioplasty and/or an approved stent (no atherectomy) during the index procedure or >30 days prior. Inflow lesions treated intraprocedure must be treated first, prior to consideration of treatment of infrapopliteal lesions. If pre-screening with angiography, CTA, MRA, or ultrasound has been performed <365 days prior to the procedure, intra-procedure angiography of the aorto-iliac vasculature is not required, however, the infrainguinal inflow must still be imaged using angiography during the index procedure. Inflow lesions must have a healthy vessel segment of >30 mm between the study lesion and the treated segment, defined as less than 50% stenosis without aneurysmal segments.
Retrograde access (in the infrapopliteal arteries) is permitted for lesion crossing, however, the Temporary Spur Stent System must be deployed from antegrade access
For subjects with bilateral disease, planned treatment of the contralateral limb must either be performed >30 days prior to the index procedure or > 14 days following the index procedure.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andrew Holden, MBChB | Auckland Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klinikum Hochsauerland Klinik für Angiologie | Arnsberg | Germany | ||||
| Universitats Herzzentrum Bad Krozingen |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24126108 | Background | Mills JL Sr, Conte MS, Armstrong DG, Pomposelli FB, Schanzer A, Sidawy AN, Andros G; Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Guidelines Committee. The Society for Vascular Surgery Lower Extremity Threatened Limb Classification System: risk stratification based on wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI). J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jan;59(1):220-34.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Oct 12. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
The second secondary efficacy measurement is decrease in Rutherford class score at 3, 6 and 12 months. Rutherford score is a classification system for patients with peripheral vascular disease. Categories are numbered from 0 to 6, with 0 being asymptomatic, and 6 being major tissue loss, functional foot no longer salvageable. Higher values are therefore considered a worse outcome. Rutherford class zero: No symptoms; Rutherford class 1: Mild Claudication (minimal leg pain with ambulation) symptoms; Rutherford Class 2: Moderate Claudication (moderate leg pain with ambulation); Rutherford Class 3: Severe claudication (severe leg pain with ambulation); Rutherford Class 4: Ischemic Rest pain (leg pain at rest); Rutherford Class 5: Minor tissue loss (nonhealing ulcer, focal gangrene, diffuse pedal ischemia); Rutherford class 6: Major tissue loss (extending above the transmetatarsal TM level, functional foot no longer salvageable. |
| 3, 6, and 12 months |
| Wound healing for subjects with Rutherford class 5 at 6 and 12 months, as assessed by the investigator using WIfI score and descriptive characteristics, including change in wound size measured by any decrease in wound surface area. | The third secondary efficacy endpoint is wound healing for subjects with Rutherford class 5 at 6 and 12 months, as assessed by the investigator using WIfI score and descriptive characteristics, including change in wound size measured by any decrease in wound surface area. The WIfI classification scoring system is a grading system using a composite score of wound (W), ischemia (I), and foot infection (fi). These three different categories are graded from 0 to 3 with 0 being the best and 3 being the worst. The total score will be provided (clinical stage 1-5), which is used to estimate the risk for major amputation at one year. Patients with a score of 1 are considered low risk, and patients with a score of 5 are considered high risk (foot not salvageable). Therefore, higher values are considered a worse outcome. The composite score is calculated by adding up the score from each category. | 6 and 12 months |
| Bad Krozingen |
| Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Leipzig | Leipzig | Germany |
| RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim | Rosenheim | Germany |
| Auckland City Hospital | Auckland | 1023 | New Zealand |
| Ospedale di Lugano Civico | Lugano | Switzerland |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058729 | Peripheral Arterial Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050197 | Atherosclerosis |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D016491 | Peripheral Vascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided