Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim was to assess the effectiveness of a condensed functional restoration program (CFRP) for patients with chronic low back pain and professional activity.
Methods: Longitudinal 1 to 3 months study of patients with non-specific chronic low back pain in one tertiary care hospital, participating in a CFRP (complex interprofessional intervention over 4 days). The primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (0-100 scale). Secondary outcomes included pain, quality of life (EQ5D), patient acceptable symptom state, presenteeism, absenteeism and psychological distress (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale). Outcomes were compared using paired sample Student's t-test or Chi2 between baseline and last follow-up. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with better response (improvement of ODI higher than 12.8) and included baseline demographic, psychological and physical assessment variables.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| condensed functional restoration program | Other | The condensed functional restoration program (CFRP) is a complex multidisciplinary intervention proposed as usual care according to international guidelines. The program takes place in our department of rheumatology, 6 hours per day, 1 day a week, for 4 weeks. Patients are included during consultation or Hospitalisation and are in groups of 6 maximum per FRP. The CRFP was developed on the basis of therapeutic patient education programs and physical exercises (Van Wambeke 2017, Desthieux 2014). Three hours per day are devoted to physical exercises which were divided into three periods: warming, stretching, and muscular strengthening. Specific exercises adapted to work circumstances (like manutention) are taught. Muscular strengthening is based on isotonic contraction on fitness devices. Education is based on 1 hour long educative session adapted from back school programs once a week. Educative booklets are also given to the patients. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Oswestry disability index | gives a subjective percentage score of level of function (disability) on a 0 to 100 scale, 100 being the highest disability state | change between baseline score and last follow-up data, i.e. data at 3 months follow-up or score at end of intervention if not available |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| lumbar pain | visual analogue scale (0-100) | change between baseline score and last follow-up data, i.e. data at 3 months follow-up or score at end of intervention if not available |
| Radicular pain |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with chronic low back pain who participated in the condensed functional restoration program between April 2012 and April 2018
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davergne Thomas | Paris | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
visual analogue scale (0-100)
| change between baseline score and last follow-up data, i.e. data at 3 months follow-up or score at end of intervention if not available |
| quality of life | EQ5D scale, converted into a global index score with 1 indicating no restriction of quality of life and -1 the worse quality of life possible | change between baseline score and last follow-up data, i.e. data at 3 months follow-up or score at end of intervention if not available |
| patient acceptable symptom state | where patients reported their satisfaction on state of symptoms by picking "acceptable" or "non acceptable" | change between baseline score and last follow-up data, i.e. data at 3 months follow-up or score at end of intervention if not available |
| World Health Organisation Health and Work Performance Questionnaire for absolute presenteeism | (reflecting the patient's overall job performance on the days worked during the past 4 weeks, 0-100, 100 being the highest amount of performance) | change between baseline score and last follow-up data, i.e. data at 3 months follow-up or score at end of intervention if not available |
| relative absenteeism | (rapport between the hours lost and the hours expected to work per month, 0-100, 100 indicates the higher amount of absenteeism) | change between baseline score and last follow-up data, i.e. data at 3 months follow-up or score at end of intervention if not available |
| psychological distress | (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale) | change between baseline score and last follow-up data, i.e. data at 3 months follow-up or score at end of intervention if not available |
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |