Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Protocol modification
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Lenvatinib was non-inferior to sorafenib in overall survival in untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.No study has evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Thus, the investigators carried out this prospective study to find out it.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lenvatinib | Experimental | Participants received lenvatinib capsules 12 milligram (mg) based on the participant's body weight greater than or equal to (>=) 60 kilogram (kg) or 8 mg based on the participant's body weight less than (<) 60 kg at baseline, orally, once daily (QD) up to documented disease progression, development of unacceptable toxicity, participant request, or withdrawal of consent. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lenvatinib | Drug | 12 mg (or 8 mg) once daily (QD) oral dosing. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| overall survival (OS) | OS was defined as the duration from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. Participants who were lost to follow-up were censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, and participants who remained alive were censored at the time of data cutoff. | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| progression free survival (PFS) | PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression based on modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), or date of death, whichever occurred first. | 12 months |
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Platelet count ≥ 50,000/μL Hemoglobin ≥ 8.5 g/dL Total bilirubin ≤ 30mmol/ L Serum albumin ≥ 32 g/L ASL and AST ≤ 6 x upper limit of normal Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal INR ≤ 1.5 or PT/APTT within normal limits Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1,500/mm3
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ming Shi, MD | Sun Yat-sen University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cancer Center Sun Yat-sen University | Guangzhou | Guangdong | 510060 | China |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018281 | Cholangiocarcinoma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C531958 | lenvatinib |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on mRECIST. CR was defined as disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of viable (enhancement of arterial phase) target lesions taking as reference to the baseline sum of the diameters of target lesions. |
| 12 months |
| Adverse Events | Number of adverse events. Postoperative adverse events were graded based on CTCAE v4.03 | 12 months |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |