Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| RX002807 | Other Grant/Funding Number | VA RR&D |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
An emerging scientific model that has been applied to chronic pain is the psychological flexibility (PF) model. PF refers to the ability to behave consistently with one's values even in the face of unwanted thoughts, feelings, and bodily sensations such as pain. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is the best known treatment derived from the PF model and is as effective as the gold standard Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), but falls short on achieving meaningful changes in functional improvement. Although ACT was designed to impact PF, methods from different treatment approaches are also consistent with the model. An experiential strategy that holds promise for enhancing PF is formal mindfulness meditation, a practice used to train non-judgmental awareness and attention to present-moment experiences, which has never been tested within the PF model. There is compelling theoretical and empirical rationale that the mechanisms underlying formal mindfulness meditation will bolster PF processes and thereby can be applied to facilitate functional improvement. To test this, the principal investigator, has developed a novel 8-week group-based intervention, Mindful Action for Pain (MAP), which integrates formal mindfulness meditation with experiential methods from different evidence-based treatment approaches in accordance with the PF model. MAP is designed such that daily mindfulness meditation practice is used to develop the capacity to more completely utilize strategies to address the key psychosocial barriers (e.g., pain catastrophizing) to optimal functioning.
This career development award (CDA-2) project consists of two phases. Phase 1 (years 1 - 2) consists of using qualitative and quantitative methods to iteratively develop and refine MAP over the course of 4 MAP cycles (n = 20). Phase 2 (years 3 - 5) consists of a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) (n = 86) of MAP vs. cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for chronic pain (CBT-CP) in order to establish feasibility of a future large-scale trial and estimate the preliminary impact of MAP. Functional improvement will be measured by reductions in pain interference (primary clinical outcome). Further, meditation adherence will be assessed to explore dose-response relationships with functional improvement, and objective measures of physical activity (actigraphy) will be captured to explore the psychophysical impact of MAP.
Chronic pain, defined as persistent or episodic pain that does not resolve with treatment, affects up to 50% of Veterans, costs the nation between $560 and $635 billion dollars annually, and is associated with high rates of disability and low quality of life. According to the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), the goal of pain treatment is to improve physical and psychosocial functioning, emphasizing non-pharmacological approaches, such as psychosocial interventions, to target psychosocial factors that maintain disability. Unfortunately, the gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), does not reliably produce meaningful increases in function.
An emerging scientific model that has been applied to chronic pain is the psychological flexibility (PF) model. PF refers to the ability to behave consistently with one's values even in the face of unwanted thoughts, feelings, and bodily sensations such as pain. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is the best known treatment derived from the PF model and is as effective as the gold standard CBT, but still falls short on achieving meaningful changes in functional improvement. Although ACT was designed to impact PF, methods from different treatment approaches are also consistent with the model. An experiential strategy that holds promise for enhancing PF is formal mindfulness meditation, a practice used to train non-judgmental awareness and attention to present-moment experiences, which has never been tested within the PF model. There is compelling theoretical and empirical rationale that the mechanisms underlying formal mindfulness meditation will bolster PF processes and thereby can be applied to facilitate functional improvement. To test this, the principal investigator, has developed a novel 8-week group-based intervention, Mindful Action for Pain (MAP), which integrates formal mindfulness meditation with experiential methods from different evidence-based treatment approaches in accordance with the PF model. MAP is designed such that daily mindfulness meditation practice is used to develop the capacity to more completely utilize strategies to address the key psychosocial barriers (e.g., pain catastrophizing) to optimal functioning.
This CDA-2 project consists of two phases. Phase 1 (years 1 - 2) consists of using qualitative and quantitative methods to iteratively develop and refine MAP over the course of 4 MAP cycles (n = 20). Phase 2 (years 3 - 5) consists of a pilot RCT (n = 86) of MAP vs. CBT for chronic pain (CBT-CP) in order to establish feasibility of a future large-scale trial and estimate the preliminary impact of MAP. Functional improvement will be measured by reductions in pain interference (primary clinical outcome). Further, meditation adherence will be assessed to explore dose-response relationships with functional improvement, and objective measures of physical activity (actigraphy) will be captured to explore the psychophysical impact of MAP.
Aim 1: Fully develop MAP in a population of Veterans with chronic pain (Phase 1).
Aim 2: Evaluate the feasibility of a future randomized efficacy trial of MAP vs. CBT-CP (Phase 2).
Hypothesis 1: MAP and CBT-CP will be feasible to deliver, as evidenced by attainment of recruitment goals, retention rates > 80%, and high credibility and expectancy ratings.
Aim 3: Estimate the preliminary impact of MAP and CBT-CP to determine if a future efficacy trial is warranted.
Examine changes in pain interference (a proxy for functional improvement and one of the most commonly measured outcomes in psychosocial intervention trials of chronic pain), pain acceptance, trait mindfulness, and pain catastrophizing, as well as patient satisfaction ratings, as indicators that MAP may be worthy of investigation in a future large-scale trial.
Exploratory Aim 1: Explore the relationship between meditation adherence and treatment outcomes.
There is growing evidence for a dose-response relationship between meditation practice and positive outcomes. Therefore, strategies to increase meditation adherence will be optimized (Phase 1) and the relationship between adherence as measured via daily diaries and outcomes will be assessed (Phase 2).
Exploratory Aim 2: Explore objective measures of physical activity at baseline and post-intervention as a potential future index of functional outcomes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development | Other | In the first arm, MAP will be fully developed. |
|
| MAP vs. CBT-CP | Active Comparator | In the second arm, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindful Action for Pain | Behavioral | MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference Subscale Change | The BPI Pain Interference subscale consists of 7-items rated on a 0 - 10 scale that measures the degree to which pain interferes with various aspects of life, including mobility, social activities, and mood. Scores are averaged with a range from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain interference (i.e., worse outcome). | Baseline and week 9 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) | The CPAQ consists of 20-items rated on a 0 - 6 scale that measures the degree that patients have adjusted to pain as part of their identity and lifestyle. Scores range from 0 to 120. Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain acceptance (i.e., better outcome). | Baseline and week 9 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Meditation Diaries | On these diaries, participants report the duration of daily meditation practice via a smartphone application. The investigators then aggregated the total amount of meditation minutes completed at home during the 8-week intervention. | Collected daily during the 8-week intervention |
| Actigraphy |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Serious or unstable medical or psychiatric illness
Active suicidal ideation or history of suicide attempt within past 3 years
Current participation in group psychotherapy for pain or any type of individual psychotherapy
Changes to professionally delivered pain or mood treatments
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Matthew Herbert, PhD | VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA | San Diego | California | 92161-0002 | United States |
A data repository will be created upon completion of the study. Data obtained in this study that has scientific value to other qualified researchers will made available upon request. Interested researches will be able to access de-identified data through a Data Use Agreement.
Indefinitely
February, 2024
Not provided
Not provided
126 participants completed the informed consent procedure. However, 9 of these participants either declined or were excluded prior to assigning them to an intervention and 1 participant did not complete the baseline assessment (violating are intent-to-treat criterion). Thus, only 116 (Phase 1: n=29; Phase 2: n=87) were assigned to an intervention and completed the baseline assessment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development (Years 1-2) | In the first arm, MAP will be fully developed. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy. |
| FG001 | MAP (Years 3-5) | Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Dialectical Behavior Therapy. |
| FG002 | CBT (Years 3-5) | Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development (Years 1-2) | In the first arm, MAP will be fully developed. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy . |
| BG001 | MAP (Years 3-5) |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 2 phases of project |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference Subscale Change | The BPI Pain Interference subscale consists of 7-items rated on a 0 - 10 scale that measures the degree to which pain interferes with various aspects of life, including mobility, social activities, and mood. Scores are averaged with a range from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain interference (i.e., worse outcome). | Veterans with heterogenous chronic pain | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and week 9 |
|
Baseline through study completion, an average of 3 months post-treatment
Does not differ
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Mindful Action for Pain (MAP) Development (Years 1-2) | In the first arm, MAP will be fully developed. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Matthew Herbert | VA San Diego Healthcare System | 858-642-1411 | Matthew.Herbert2@va.gov |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Dec 12, 2023 | Nov 11, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jan 26, 2023 | Nov 11, 2024 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059350 | Chronic Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015928 | Cognitive Behavioral Therapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001521 | Behavior Therapy |
| D011613 | Psychotherapy |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
Not provided
Not provided
Group Randomized Controlled Trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain | Behavioral | CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study. |
|
|
| Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) |
The MAAS consists of 15-items assessing present-moment attention and awareness of everyday experiences. Scores range from 1-6 with higher scores reflecting greater mindfulness (i.e., better outcome). |
| Baseline and week 9 |
| Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | The PCS consists of 13 items rated on 0 - 4 scale that measures the degree to which people experience an aversive orientation towards pain. Scores range from 0 - 52). Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain catastrophizing (i.e., worse outcome). | Baseline and week 9 |
Participants in Phase 2 MAP and CBT groups wore actiwatches for two 7-day periods at baseline and week 9 to measure average physical activity counts. |
| Baseline and week 9 |
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Medical Health Issue |
|
| Personal Issues |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy . |
| BG002 | CBT (Years 3-5) | Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Standard Deviation |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Brief Pain Inventory - Pain Interference | The BPI Pain Interference subscale consists of 7-items rated on a 0 - 10 scale that measures the degree to which pain interferes with various aspects of life, including mobility, social activities, and mood. Scores are averaged with a range from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain interference (i.e., worse outcome). | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| MAP Group (Years 3-5) |
In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. |
| OG002 | CBT Group (Years 3-5) | In Years 3-5, MAP will be compared to CBT-CP to establish feasibility of a larger, future trial. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study. |
|
|
| Secondary | Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) | The CPAQ consists of 20-items rated on a 0 - 6 scale that measures the degree that patients have adjusted to pain as part of their identity and lifestyle. Scores range from 0 to 120. Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain acceptance (i.e., better outcome). | Veterans with heterogenous chronic pain | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on scale | Baseline and week 9 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS) | The MAAS consists of 15-items assessing present-moment attention and awareness of everyday experiences. Scores range from 1-6 with higher scores reflecting greater mindfulness (i.e., better outcome). | Veterans with heterogenous chronic pain | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on scale | Baseline and week 9 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) | The PCS consists of 13 items rated on 0 - 4 scale that measures the degree to which people experience an aversive orientation towards pain. Scores range from 0 - 52). Higher scores indicate higher levels of pain catastrophizing (i.e., worse outcome). | Veterans with heterogenous chronic pain | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on scale | Baseline and week 9 |
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Meditation Diaries | On these diaries, participants report the duration of daily meditation practice via a smartphone application. The investigators then aggregated the total amount of meditation minutes completed at home during the 8-week intervention. | Data not collected for participants in the CBT (Years 3-5) Arm. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Hours | Collected daily during the 8-week intervention |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Actigraphy | Participants in Phase 2 MAP and CBT groups wore actiwatches for two 7-day periods at baseline and week 9 to measure average physical activity counts. | Data from MAP Development years 1-2 not included because there was no randomization. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Activity counts | Baseline and week 9 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 29 |
| 0 |
| 29 |
| 0 |
| 29 |
| EG001 | MAP (Years 3-5) | Mindful Action for Pain: MAP integrates formal mindfulness meditation with methods from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. | 0 | 46 | 0 | 46 | 0 | 46 |
| EG002 | CBT (Years 3-5) | Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: CBT-CP is the current gold standard psychosocial intervention for chronic pain and will be compared to MAP in the second arm of the study. | 0 | 41 | 0 | 41 | 0 | 41 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Posttreatment |
|
|
| Posttreatment |
|
|
| Posttreatment |
|
|
| .698 |
| Slope |
| 0.02 |
| Standard Error of the Mean |
| 0.05 |
| Other |
Linear mixed effect model estimating total meditation hours as a predictor of change in pain acceptance (Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire) at post-treatment |
| Linear mixed effect model | .110 | Slope | 0.00 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.00 | Other | Linear mixed effect model estimating total meditation hours as a predictor of change in mindfulness (Mindful Attention Awareness Scale) at post-treatment |
| Linear mixed effect model | .269 | Slope | -0.03 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.03 | Other | Linear mixed effect model estimating total meditation hours as a predictor of change in cognitive defusion (Cognitive Defusion Questionnaire) at post-treatment |
| Linear mixed effect model | .205 | Slope | -0.02 | Standard Error of the Mean | 0.02 | Other | Linear mixed effect model estimating total meditation hours as a predictor of change in pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale) at post-treatment |
| Activity counts post-treatment |
|
|