Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Paris West University Nanterre La Défense | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study examines the impact of cognitive training among participants with ADHD in Switzerland
The main aim of the experimental study is to investigate cognitive functioning, behavioral and neural levels in ADHD, both before and after cognitive training where there has been the addition of motivation elements. Near and far transfers effects of this new program are evaluated. For far transfers, ambulatory assessment is used to improve ecological validity. Neural activity has rarely been examined in cognitive training with ADHD participants, and that is why this study also includes FMRI measures. Long-term effects, defined as three and six months following the completion of cognitive training, are also investigated. This study focuses on children, adolescents and adults with ADHD. Indeed, cognitive training effects have been rarely studied over the lifespan.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| active control group low-intensity | Active Comparator | Low intensity version of the same cognitive training program Exercice are realized at home using a computer 25 sessions of 30-45 minutes are realized five days per week during 5 weeks |
|
| experimental training group cognitive training | Experimental | a multifactorial cognitive program that tackles working memory, attention, inhibition, planification and reasoning Exercice are realized at home using a computer 25 sessions of 30-45 minutes are realized five days per week during 5 weeks |
|
| control healthy participants | No Intervention | Just a control group including healthy participants No intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive training | Other | Participants will train at home during 25 sessions (about 45 minutes each) over a maximum of 5 weeks. Investigators will verify compliance via Internet and call participants and their legal guardians once a week. A reward system will be established with participants. Five sessions of metacognition (1 hour each) are added. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ADHD symptoms for adults | The Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS) higher values represent worse outcome The Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS) is used to assess ADHD symptoms among adults (Conners et al., 1999) depending on the DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2000). This short version includes 26 items and 4 possible ratings from from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). This scale comprises four factors: (1) inattention, memory problems, (2) hyperactivity, restlessness, (3) impulsivity, emotional lability, (4) problems with self-concept and one ADHD index. score are summed. Range 0 to 100. | Change between two time points from baseline T1 to six week later T2 after cognitive training is assessed. Follow up is assessed at 3 months T3 and 6 months T4 |
| ADHD symptoms for children | The Conners Scale, 3rd edition higher values represent a worse outcome Questionnaire is rated by the legal guardian. This questionnaire assesses ADHD symptoms.Score are summed. Score range 0 to 100. | Change between two time points from baseline T1 to six week later T2 after cognitive training is assessed. Follow up is assessed at 3 months T3 and 6 months T4 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Impulsivity | The Impulsivity Behavior Scale (UPPS) higher values represent a worse outcome. score are summed short version contains 20 items measuring the following five dimensions of impulsivity: positive urgency, negative urgency, lack of perseverance, lack of premeditation and sensation seeking. This scale is based on Cyder and Smith (2007) and Whiteside and Lynam (2001) theory of impulsivity. Range 0 to 50. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
-
Participants fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study for the patients'group:
Participants fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the study for the control group of healthy participants:
Exclusion Criteria:
The exclusion criteria for the participants in the patient's group are:
(7) FMRI exclusion: claustrophobia, Pregnancy known or suspected,metallic implants in their bodies (e.g: pacemakers, aneurism clips, metal Prosthetic, cochlear implant) (8) In case of suicidal risk, the participant is encouraged to consult the medical staff (9) Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant (10) Participation in another study on cognitive training (11) Previous enrolment into the current study (12) Enrolment of the investigator, his/her family members, employees and other dependent persons
The exclusion criteria for the participants in the control group of healthy participants are:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| amelie dentz, Ph.D | Contact | 0676951881 | ameliedentz@hotmail.com | |
| Chantal Martin Soelch, Pr | Contact | +41 26 300 7687 | chantal.martinsoelch@unifr.ch |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Amélie Dentz, Ph.D | University of Fribourg | Principal Investigator |
| Martin Soelch Chantal, PR | University of Fribourg | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dentz Amélie | Montreal | Quebec | 2000 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27875585 | Background | Spencer-Smith M, Klingberg T. Correction: Benefits of a Working Memory Training Program for Inattention in Daily Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 22;11(11):e0167373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167373. eCollection 2016. | |
| 24438534 | Result | Gathercole SE. Commentary: Working memory training and ADHD - where does its potential lie? Reflections on Chacko et al. (2014). J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;55(3):256-7. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12196. Epub 2014 Jan 20. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001289 | Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019958 | Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders |
| D065886 | Neurodevelopmental Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000091942 | Cognitive Training |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000066530 | Neurological Rehabilitation |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
| D000359 | Aftercare |
| D003266 | Continuity of Patient Care |
Not provided
Not provided
will compare the ADHD group with a control group including healthy participants .The experimental study uses a pseudo-randomized, double-blind, controlled multi-center design.Participants will be assigned to an experimental group (cognitive training ) or in a control active group.
Not provided
Not provided
Participant are blind on their group assignation. Investigator are blind on group assignation
|
| Change between two time points from baseline T1 to six week later T2 after cognitive training is assessed. Follow up is assessed at 3 months T3 and 6 months T4 |
| executive function | The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function higher values represent a worse outcome Score are summed. This questionnaire measures executive functionning in everyday life. The BRIEF includes 75 questions and eight sub-domains: Inhibit Shift, Emotional Control, Initiate, Working Memory, Plan/Organize, Organization of Materials and Monitor. Score range 0 to 100 | Change between two time points from baseline T1 to six week later T2 after cognitive training is assessed. Follow up is assessed at 3 months T3 and 6 months T4 |
| Reward | Subjects will perform a reward under stress task adapted from the spatial delayed response task from (Glahn et al., 2002) measure reward (Martin-Soelch, C., et al.,2009: Gaillac et al., 2016). Reaction time is calculated. The sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward questionnaire for Children, adolescents (SPSRQ-C) (Colder and O'Connor 2004) and adults (SPSRQ, Torrubia, Ávila, Moltó, & Caseras, 2001) are used. These questionnaires are based on Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (1981, 1987, 2000). Reward task higher values represent a better outcome. Score range 0 to 110. | Change between two time points from baseline T1 to six week later T2 after cognitive training is assessed. Follow up is assessed at 3 months T3 and 6 months T4 |
| Reward | The sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward questionnaire for Children, adolescents (SPSRQ-C) (Colder and O'Connor 2004) and adults (SPSRQ, Torrubia, Ávila, Moltó, & Caseras, 2001) are used. These questionnaires are based on Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality (1981, 1987, 2000). Reward task higher values represent a better outcome. Score range 0 to 110. | Change between two time points from baseline T1 to six week later T2 after cognitive training is assessed. Follow up is assessed at 3 months T3 and 6 months T4 |
| Memory | WISC-IV higher values represent a better outcome. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV, Wechsler, 2003) Score are standardized from 0 to 20 for subtest and summed from 0 to 150. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV, Wechsler, 2003) and the Weschler adult intelligent scale measure verbal memory. Score are standardized from 0 to 20 for subtest and summed from 0 to 150. | Change between two time points from baseline T1 to six week later T2 after cognitive training is assessed. Follow up is assessed at 3 months T3 and 6 months T4 training 4. Six months after cognitive training |
| Memory | WAIS-IV higher values represent a better outcome .the Weschler adult intelligent scale to (WAIS-IV; Wechsler, 2008). Score are standardized from 0 to 20 for subtest and summed from 0 to 150. The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV, Wechsler, 2003) and the Weschler adult intelligent scale measure verbal memory. Score are standardized from 0 to 20 for subtest and summed from 0 to 150. | Change between two time points from baseline T1 to six week later T2 after cognitive training is assessed. Follow up is assessed at 3 months T3 and 6 months T4 training 4. Six months after cognitive training |
| Neural activity | The fMRI measure include. Resting-state functional MRI.Task-free. Subjects are instructed to just lie quietly in the scanner and to think of nothing in particular and let their mind wander.- binding potential (ΔBP) is measured. | Change between two time points from baseline T1 to six week later T2 after cognitive training is assessed. Follow up is assessed at 3 months T3 and 6 months T4 |
| D005791 |
| Patient Care |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D006296 | Health Services |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |