Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to identify the knowledge and behavior on dental health and hygiene among adolescents. In most cases, the investigators know tooth decay can be prevented and reversed at an early stage by observing good oral hygiene. Few studies have been done among adolescents.
This study could justify the implementation of public health actions in terms of prevention.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| witness | No Intervention | 2 control CE2 classes without oral sensitization actions | |
| group intervention 1 | Experimental | 2 CE2 classes with a classical lecture style presentation |
|
| group intervention 2 | Experimental | 2 CE2 classes with an intervention in the form of fun workshops on different themes by small groups of schoolchildren (8-10 children per workshop) |
|
| group intervention 3 | Experimental | 2 CE2 classes with digital media intervention |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| classical lecture style presentation | Other | classical lecture style presentation |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| comparison of children's notes before and after a prevention intervention | The main result will be calculated with the total score to the questions. Each question corresponds to a point. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 25. We will compare the evolution of the averages obtained by the control group and by all three other groups with Student test | 1 day |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Compare the evolution of children's grades according to the type of intervention | For the secondary objective, we will compare the evolution of the averages obtained between the three groups with intervention with ANOVA test. Each question corresponds to a point. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 25. before and after the explanation as well as one month and 6 months after the intervention |
Inclusion criteria:
- All children of classrooms selectionned
Exclusion criteria:
- Children absent on the day of the intervention
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Camille INQUIMBERT, PhD student | University Hospital, Montpellier | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uhmontpellier | Montpellier | 34295 | France |
NC
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| an intervention in the form of fun workshops |
| Other |
an intervention in the form of fun workshops on different themes by small groups of schoolchildren (8-10 children per workshop) |
|
| digital media intervention | Other | digital media intervention |
|
| before and after the explanation as well as one month and 6 months after the intervention |
| Determine the timeframe by which children forget the information they have been given | A questionnaire to know the oral knowledge will be distributed to the children before and after the explanation as well as one month and 6 months after the intervention | before and after the explanation as well as one month and 6 months after the intervention |