Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Tiger Biosciences, LLC. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective of this small feasibility pilot study is to demonstrate that implant-based breast reconstruction (after treatment for cancer) can successfully be performed without prolonged drain placement, using a tissue expander with a reservoir and in-office transcutaneous fluid aspiration. Secondly, the investigators aim to provide enough confidence in this technique that a larger study can be performed to demonstrate fewer complications (infection, drain-related pain and re-operation rates) when compared to the use of conventional tissue expanders and/or implants with prolonged drain placement.
Patients electing to have staged, implant-based, bilateral breast reconstruction at the time of mastectomy (for either cancer or cancer prevention) will undergo a standardized subpectoral tissue expander placement (using the Sientra AlloX2 dual-port device) on each side of the chest with a single piece of acellular dermal matrix (ADM). A single drain in the subcutaneous pocket of each breast will be used and removed on the first post-operative day. Patients will be admitted for overnight observation in the hospital. Each post-operative day fluid will be aspirated from each reservoir port using a standard sterile technique, and the volume recorded. After discharge, patients will be seen in the office within one week of discharge and fluid aspirated from each expander using the reservoir ports, and the volume shall be recorded. The aspiration will be repeated weekly until expansion is completed and/or the amount of fluid aspirated is less than 10 cc.
Patients will be asked to complete a 7 item multiple-choice questionnaire regarding their attitudes about their breast reconstruction, first at completion of tissue expansion and finally at their first follow-up visit following placement of permanent breast implants.
This study utilizes FDA 510k-classified devices that allow removal of fluid without drains, in lieu of more conventional expanders, allowing for the avoidance of prolonged drain usage.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| All patients in study | 5 consecutive patients with breast cancer or a breast cancer-causing gene that elect to undergo bilateral breast reconstruction will be Insertion of Tissue Expander with Fluid Reservoir as the first stage of reconstruction. Post-surgical care will be similar as patients with conventional expanders, except that during office visits, fluid will be transcutaneously aspirated from the fluid reservoir on each side. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insertion of Tissue Expander with Fluid Reservoir | Device | Use of unique expander type in first stage of a two-stage breast reconstruction, without prolonged drain placement. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients with successful breast reconstruction using reservoir-expanders | The number of patients that successfully complete two stage implant-based breast reconstruction with fluid-reservoir tissue expanders and early drain removal. An outcome failure would be if the expander required removal due to uncontrolled seroma, infection or other factor that prevents a successful implant-based reconstruction. | 4-6 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Female breast cancer patients are usually candidates for reconstruction using breast implants
Not provided
Women over the age of 21 with breast cancer or a gene that increases the risk of breast cancer who elect to undergo bilateral mastectomies and two-stage implant-based reconstruction using tissue expanders and permanent implants.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Edward C Ray, MD | Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Los Angeles | California | 90048 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30093286 | Background | Smith JM, Broyles JM, Guo Y, Tuffaha SH, Mathes D, Sacks JM. Human acellular dermis increases surgical site infection and overall complication profile when compared with submuscular breast reconstruction: An updated meta-analysis incorporating new products✰. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Nov;71(11):1547-1556. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jul 6. | |
| 22186498 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| D061325 | Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Kim JYS, Davila AA, Persing S, Connor CM, Jovanovic B, Khan SA, Fine N, Rawlani V. A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan;129(1):28-41. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182361fd6. |
| 28671886 | Background | Ollech CJ, Block LM, Afifi AM, Poore SO. Effect of Drain Placement on Infection, Seroma, and Return to Operating Room in Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Dec;79(6):536-540. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001174. |
| 23346164 | Background | Srivastava V, Basu S, Shukla VK. Seroma formation after breast cancer surgery: what we have learned in the last two decades. J Breast Cancer. 2012 Dec;15(4):373-80. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2012.15.4.373. Epub 2012 Dec 31. |
| 22693384 | Background | Sampathraju S, Rodrigues G. Seroma formation after mastectomy: pathogenesis and prevention. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2010 Dec;1(4):328-33. doi: 10.1007/s13193-011-0067-5. Epub 2011 Apr 2. |
| 20190908 | Background | Murray JD, Elwood ET, Jones GE, Barrick R, Feng J. Decreasing expander breast infection: A new drain care protocol. Can J Plast Surg. 2009 Spring;17(1):17-21. |
| 12648685 | Background | Carcoforo P, Soliani G, Maestroni U, Donini A, Inderbitzin D, Hui TT, Lefor A, Avital I, Navarra G. Octreotide in the treatment of lymphorrhea after axillary node dissection: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Mar;196(3):365-9. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01757-X. |
| 25426395 | Background | Park JE, Nigam M, Shenaq DS, Song DH. A simple, safe technique for thorough seroma evacuation in the outpatient setting. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014 Oct 7;2(9):e212. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000179. eCollection 2014 Sep. |
| 12757076 | Background | Puttawibul P, Sangthong B, Maipang T, Sampao S, Uttamakul P, Apakupakul N. Mastectomy without drain at pectoral area: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai. 2003 Apr;86(4):325-31. |
| 27190645 | Background | Rose JF, Zafar SN, Ellsworth Iv WA. Does Acellular Dermal Matrix Thickness Affect Complication Rate in Tissue Expander Based Breast Reconstruction? Plast Surg Int. 2016;2016:2867097. doi: 10.1155/2016/2867097. Epub 2016 Apr 12. |
| 29595716 | Background | Zeidler KR, Capizzi PJ, Pittman TA. Sientra AlloX2 Short-Term Case Study, Surgical Pearls, and Roundtable Discussion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Apr;141(4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants):29S-39S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004352. |
| 22770571 | Background | Moyer KE, Potochny JD. Technique for seroma drainage in implant-based breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Dec;65(12):1614-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Jul 6. |
| 27018665 | Background | Jordan SW, Khavanin N, Kim JYS. Seroma in Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Apr;137(4):1104-1116. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000481102.24444.72. |
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D010051 | Ovarian Neoplasms |
| D004701 | Endocrine Gland Neoplasms |
| D009386 | Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary |
| D010049 | Ovarian Diseases |
| D000291 | Adnexal Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D005833 | Genital Neoplasms, Female |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D006058 | Gonadal Disorders |