Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The relapsing nature of opioid use disorder is a major obstacle to successful treatment. About 90% of those entering treatment will relapse within one year. To improve treatment outcome, new interventions targeting the underlying brain biomarkers of relapse vulnerability hold significant promise in reducing this critical public health problem. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that can modulate brain connectivity.
Cognitive flexibility, the ability to change maladaptive behavior, depends on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) input to the nucleus accumbens (NAcc; Gruber, Hussain, and O'Donnell 2009). DLPFC stimulation may increase input to NAcc to facilitate proper selection of goal-directed behavior and may also decrease craving in individuals with substance use disorder (Boggio et al. 2008).
We will use transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to stimulate the DLPFC. TDCS is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that can modulate brain connectivity. TDCS involves applying a weak electrical current (2mA or less) to the scalp via anodal and cathodal electrode sponges, causing either increases or decreases in cortical excitability, respectively. Research has shown in both healthy subjects and patients (e.g. Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, stroke, and depression) that tDCS has the potential to modulate synaptic strengthening and neurotransmitter-dependent plasticity underlying changes in behavior and learning (Lang et al. 2005).
We are anticipating enrollment of 30 participants. Fifteen participants will be randomly assigned to the interventional tDCS condition, while 15 participants will be randomly assigned to sham tDCS. Both conditions will undergo five sessions of tDCS across five days. Participants will undergo pre- and post-tDCS MRI scans, in addition to clinical interviews and questionnaires. Follow-up interviews will be conducted in person 1 and 2 months after intervention completion to inquire about relapse status.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental: active tDCS | Experimental | Subjects that are randomly assigned to this arm will undergo 5 sessions of tDCS. |
|
| Sham Comparator: sham tDCS | Sham Comparator | Subjects randomly assigned to sham-tDCS will receive very low current stimulation at the beginning and end of the session, mimicking the feeling of current stimulation in the scalp, but not reaching levels that will stimulate brain function. There will be a total of 5 sham tDCS sessions. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) | Device | tDCS will be performed with Neuroelectrics Starstim Enobio 20, a non-invasive investigational device that has been labeled as a non-significant risk device by the FDA. This study is regulated by the FDA as an Abbreviated IDE. It has built-in safety mechanisms which allow for immediate cessation of stimulation if the subject becomes uncomfortable. The current will be administered via two electrode sponges for 25 mins with 1-2 milliamperes. These administration protocols are in line with protocols that have outlined safe administration (Nitsche 2007; 2008). No side-effects have been reported with the exception of slight itching under the electrode and occasional occurrence of headache, fatigue, or nausea (Poreisz 2007). Electrodes placement: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC); cathode on left DLPFC, anode on right DLPFC. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in brain functional connectivity as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging | Investigators will measure magnitude of functional connectivity in between nucleus accumbens (NAcc) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) both at baseline and at follow-up and compare the magnitude of change between the active-tDCS and sham-tDCS groups. | Change between baseline and 1-week follow-up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation between functional connectivity change and craving scores | Investigators will (1) compare change in craving scores (difference in craving scores between 2 and 3 weeks of abstinence) between active-tDCS and sham-tDCS groups and (2) conduct parametric correlations between functional connectivity change and change in craving scores. | Data collection will be during 2 and 3 weeks of abstinence |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jazmin Y Camchong, PhD | University of Minnesota | Principal Investigator |
| Kelvin O Lim, MD | University of Minnesota | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55414 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24745476 | Background | Camchong J, Macdonald AW 3rd, Mueller BA, Nelson B, Specker S, Slaymaker V, Lim KO. Changes in resting functional connectivity during abstinence in stimulant use disorder: a preliminary comparison of relapsers and abstainers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jun 1;139:145-51. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.03.024. Epub 2014 Mar 29. | |
| 22819968 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009293 | Opioid-Related Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000079524 | Narcotic-Related Disorders |
| D019966 | Substance-Related Disorders |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D065908 | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D003295 | Convulsive Therapy |
| D013000 | Psychiatric Somatic Therapies |
Not provided
Not provided
This study is randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled. Participants will be randomly assigned to either active or sham tDCS. We are testing device feasibility, safety, and circuit-based targeted engagement.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will not be informed on their assigned protocol. During consent, they will be informed that there is a 50% chance of being assigned either to the group receiving active tDCS or the group receiving sham tDCS.
The Principal Investigator and research staff will also be blind to the condition the participant is assigned to.
|
|
| Correlation between functional connectivity change and clinical outcome | Investigators will record relapse status during the 2 months following treatment discharge. | Between 2 weeks of abstinence and 2 months later |
| Camchong J, Stenger A, Fein G. Resting-state synchrony during early alcohol abstinence can predict subsequent relapse. Cereb Cortex. 2013 Sep;23(9):2086-99. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs190. Epub 2012 Jul 20. |
| 23421812 | Background | Camchong J, Stenger VA, Fein G. Resting-state synchrony in short-term versus long-term abstinent alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013 May;37(5):794-803. doi: 10.1111/acer.12037. Epub 2013 Feb 19. |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
| D004597 | Electroshock |
| D011580 | Psychological Techniques |