Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| The Bloomberg Family Foundation, Inc. | OTHER |
| Ifakara Health Institute | OTHER |
| Pontificia Universidad Javeriana | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study evaluates the effect of three different airtime incentive amounts on interactive voice response (IVR) survey cooperation, response, refusal and contact rates, as compared to control group, in Colombia and Tanzania.
Using random digit dialing (RDD) sampling technique, participants were randomized one of four airtime incentive amounts contingent on them completing the noncommunicable disease risk factor survey. This mobile phone survey will be sent as an interactive voice response (IVR). In IVR surveys, participants use their touch tone key pad to answer pre-recorded questions. (i.e. If you are male, pres 1; If you are female, press 2). This study will be conducted in both Colombia and Tanzania.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | No Intervention | No airtime incentive was given for completing the survey | |
| 1X Incentive | Experimental | 1X airtime incentive |
|
| 2X incentive | Experimental | 2X airtime incentive |
|
| Lottery Incentive | Experimental | Lottery airtime incentive given to one in 20 participants |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1X airtime incentive | Other | An incentive given in the form of airtime |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cooperation Rate #1 | As defined by American Association for Public Opinion Research, cooperation rate is defined as I/(I+P+R) where I is complete interviews, P is partial interviews, and R is refusals and breakoffs. | Through study completion, an average of one month |
| Response Rate #4 | As defined by American Association for Public Opinion Research, response rate is defined as (I+P)/(I+P+R+eU) where I is complete interviews, P is partial interviews, R is refusals and breakoffs, and eU is the estimated eligible proportion of unknowns | Through study completion, an average of one month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Refusal Rate #2 | As defined by American Association for Public Opinion Research, refusal rate is defined as (R)/(I+P+R+eU) where R is refusals and breakoffs, I is complete interviews, P is partial interviews, and eU is the estimated eligible proportion of unknowns | Through study completion, an average of one month |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Adnan A Hyder, PhD, MBBS | Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health | Principal Investigator |
| George W. Pariyo, PhD | Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instituto de Salud Publica Pontificia Universidad Javeriana | Bogotá | D.C. | Colombia | |||
| Ifakara Health Institute |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28476729 | Background | Gibson DG, Pariyo GW, Wosu AC, Greenleaf AR, Ali J, Ahmed S, Labrique AB, Islam K, Masanja H, Rutebemberwa E, Hyder AA. Evaluation of Mechanisms to Improve Performance of Mobile Phone Surveys in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Research Protocol. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 May 5;6(5):e81. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7534. | |
| 28476725 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be randomized to one of four airtime incentive amounts: 1) no incentive; 2) 1X incentive; 3) 2X incentive or 4) a lottery incentive, in which one out of every 20 participants will receive the incentive. Airtime incentives were sent if participants completed the noncommunicable disease risk factor survey.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 2X airtime incentive |
| Other |
An incentive given in the form of airtime |
|
| Lottery airtime incentive | Other | An incentive given in the form of airtime |
|
| Contact Rate #2 |
As defined by American Association for Public Opinion Research, contact rate is defined as (I+P+R)/(I+P+R+eU) where I is complete interviews, P is partial interviews, R is refusals and breakoffs, and eU is the estimated eligible proportion of unknowns |
| Through study completion, an average of one month |
| Dar es Salaam |
| Tanzania |
| Gibson DG, Pereira A, Farrenkopf BA, Labrique AB, Pariyo GW, Hyder AA. Mobile Phone Surveys for Collecting Population-Level Estimates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Literature Review. J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 5;19(5):e139. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7428. |
| 28476724 | Background | Gibson DG, Farrenkopf BA, Pereira A, Labrique AB, Pariyo GW. The Development of an Interactive Voice Response Survey for Noncommunicable Disease Risk Factor Estimation: Technical Assessment and Cognitive Testing. J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 5;19(5):e112. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7340. |
| 28476722 | Background | Hyder AA, Wosu AC, Gibson DG, Labrique AB, Ali J, Pariyo GW. Noncommunicable Disease Risk Factors and Mobile Phones: A Proposed Research Agenda. J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 5;19(5):e133. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7246. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000073296 | Noncommunicable Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided