Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| NCI-2018-00643 | Registry Identifier | NCI Clinical Trial Reporting Program |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
| Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) | FED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This trial studies how well a breast cancer surgery decision aid works in increasing patient engagement in decision making for patients with newly diagnosed stage 0-III breast cancer. The trial also examines barriers to patient engagement even with the use of a decision aid, and if barriers are more likely to be experienced by socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.
The primary and secondary objectives of the study:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Test the effectiveness of a breast cancer surgery decision aid in increasing patient engagement in decision making (measured by knowledge and power) in clinics serving a high proportion of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.
II. Test the extent to which the effect of a decision aid on patient engagement is mediated through the mitigation of barriers and determine if persistent barriers are disproportionately experienced by socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Characterize how persistent barriers influence patient engagement in decision making in order to identify targets for adjunct interventions that could be implemented in clinics serving a high proportion of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.
Trial Design:
OUTLINE: This is a multi-site cluster randomized trial using a stepped wedge design. Ten clinics will be recruited for participation. All clinics will begin in the usual care arm. Clinics will be randomized to the timing with which they cross-over to the decision aid intervention, with new clinics crossing over every 10 weeks.
ARM I: usual care
ARM II: decision aid intervention
The only difference between patients enrolled before institutional crossover and patients enrolled after institutional crossover is those who are enrolled after institutional crossover will have been offered the decision aid as accepted practice in the clinic.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm I (surgical consultation) | Active Comparator | Prior to institutional crossover, participants receive care as per usual care. |
|
| Arm II (web-based breast cancer surgery decision aid) | Experimental | Following a 10 week implementation period, at the time of institutional crossover, participants will receive a web-based decision aid prior to the surgical consultation.. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Other | Usual Care |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Power: Self-efficacy in Patient Physician Interactions | Power is defined as patients' self-perceived capacity to influence the decision-making encounter. This construct is measured using the Patient's Self-Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI)-5 point scale; the primary outcome measure is a total score ranging from 5-25, where higher scores indicate increased self-efficacy. The patient completes the PEPPI-5 questionnaire within 3 weeks post-surgical consultation. | 3 weeks |
| Patient Power: Active Patient Participation | Power is also separately measured by the validated Active Patient Participation Behaviors System to assess active patient participation during the surgeon consultation and is measured off the audio-recording of the consultation; a summary measure of patient's active involvement in the interaction is coded by the study team and represents a total count of patients' communicative behaviors (i.e., count of patient asking questions, count of patient assertive responses and count of patient expressions of concern) ranging from 0-114, where higher scores indicate increased active patient participation. The consultation for a patient will typically be study day 1 (day of registration). | 1 day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Knowledge | Patient knowledge is measured from 5 knowledge questions in the Decision Quality Instrument-Breast Surgery survey, with a percent correct recorded as the secondary outcome measure, ranging from 0-100%. The patient completes the Decision Quality Instrument-Breast Surgery survey within 3 weeks post-surgical consultation. | Up to 3 weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Heather B. Neuman,, MD, MS | University of Wisconsin, Madison | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Epic Care-Dublin | Dublin | California | 94568 | United States | ||
| Bay Area Breast Surgeons Inc |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42128956 | Derived | Saucke MC, Jacobson N, Chow S, McKinney G, Neuman HB. Providing information to prepare breast cancer patients for their surgical consultation: barriers and recommendations (an analysis from Alliance A231701CD). Support Care Cancer. 2026 May 14;34(6):537. doi: 10.1007/s00520-026-10726-7. | |
| 40382452 | Derived | Schumacher JR, Hanlon BM, Zahrieh D, Rathouz PJ, Tucholka JL, McKinney G, Tan AD, Breuer CR, Bailey L, Higham AM, Wecsler JS, Arnold AH, Froix AJ, Dull S, Abbott AM, Fine SG, McGuire KP, Seydel AS, McNamara P, Chow S, Neuman HB. Impact of a Web-Based Decision Aid on Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Patients' Engagement in Breast Surgery Decision-Making: Stepped-Wedge Clinical Trial (Alliance-A231701CD). Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug;32(8):5540-5550. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17452-0. Epub 2025 May 17. |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
Beginning 6 to 12 months following article publication.
Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee ("learned intermediary") identified for this purpose.
This stepped wedge cluster randomized trial across 10 sites transitioned sites from UC to DA at pre-determined and randomly assigned timepoints, with waves spanning 10-13 weeks each. Sites started in UC and ended with DA. One wave is used for implementation of the DA at the time of crossover, yielding 6 waves for enrollment/data collection.
The extended enrollment was to enrich the sample for the mixed methods components of the analysis. Surgeon enrollment was not linked to specific wave.
A total of 627 participants were enrolled. Five-hundred and ninety-eight patients (265 UC, 333 DA) were enrolled between June 2019 to December 2021 with 576 (265 UC, 311 DA) during stepped wedge design and 22 extended enrollment beyond Wave 7 (all DA). Twenty-nine surgeons were enrolled between April 2019 to October 2021 with the majority enrolled at the start of the study, while a few additional surgeons were enrolled as they joined the clinic.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Site 1 and 2 | 10-13 weeks Usual Care (Participants receive care as per usual care), 10 weeks Implementation (Decision aid implemented at the corresponding clinic) and 65-82 weeks Intervention (Participants receive a web-based decision aid intervention prior to the surgical consultation) |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP_ICF | Yes | Yes | Yes | Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form | Jan 5, 2022 |
Not provided
Institutional cross-over
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Web-based decision aid | Other | Web-based decision aid received prior to the surgical consultation |
|
| Concordance Between Personal Values and Surgery Received | This is a binary outcome reflecting whether surgery received (mastectomy; lumpectomy) was concordant or not with the patient's personal values. The patient's personal values are measured from 3 questions on the Decision Quality Instrument (DQI)-Breast Surgery survey; each question ranges from 0 (not at all important) to 10 (extremely important). . The patient completes the DQI within 3 weeks post-consultation. The method by Sepucha et al (2012) will be applied to determine concordance between personal values and surgery received. | Up to 3 weeks |
| Emeryville |
| California |
| 94608 |
| United States |
| Epic Care Partners in Cancer Care | Emeryville | California | 94608 | United States |
| Contra Costa Regional Medical Center | Martinez | California | 94553-3156 | United States |
| Alta Bates Summit Medical Center - Summit Campus | Oakland | California | 94609 | United States |
| Bay Area Tumor Institute | Oakland | California | 94609 | United States |
| Epic Care Cyberknife Center | Walnut Creek | California | 94597 | United States |
| Augusta University Medical Center | Augusta | Georgia | 30912 | United States |
| Hawaii Cancer Care Inc - Waterfront Plaza | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96813 | United States |
| Island Urology | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96813 | United States |
| Queen's Cancer Cenrer - POB I | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96813 | United States |
| Queen's Medical Center | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96813 | United States |
| Straub Clinic and Hospital | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96813 | United States |
| University of Hawaii Cancer Center | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96813 | United States |
| Hawaii Cancer Care Inc-Liliha | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96817 | United States |
| Kuakini Medical Center | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96817 | United States |
| Queen's Cancer Center - Kuakini | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96817 | United States |
| The Cancer Center of Hawaii-Liliha | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96817 | United States |
| Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children | Honolulu | Hawaii | 96826 | United States |
| Wilcox Memorial Hospital and Kauai Medical Clinic | Lihue | Hawaii | 96766 | United States |
| Hawaii Cancer Care - Savio | ‘Aiea | Hawaii | 96701 | United States |
| Pali Momi Medical Center | ‘Aiea | Hawaii | 96701 | United States |
| Queen's Cancer Center - Pearlridge | ‘Aiea | Hawaii | 96701 | United States |
| The Cancer Center of Hawaii-Pali Momi | ‘Aiea | Hawaii | 96701 | United States |
| Saint Alphonsus Cancer Care Center-Boise | Boise | Idaho | 83706 | United States |
| Saint Alphonsus Cancer Care Center-Caldwell | Caldwell | Idaho | 83605 | United States |
| Kootenai Health - Coeur d'Alene | Coeur d'Alene | Idaho | 83814 | United States |
| Walter Knox Memorial Hospital | Emmett | Idaho | 83617 | United States |
| Idaho Urologic Institute-Meridian | Meridian | Idaho | 83642 | United States |
| Saint Alphonsus Medical Center-Nampa | Nampa | Idaho | 83686 | United States |
| Kootenai Clinic Cancer Services - Post Falls | Post Falls | Idaho | 83854 | United States |
| Kootenai Cancer Clinic | Sandpoint | Idaho | 83864 | United States |
| John H Stroger Jr Hospital of Cook County | Chicago | Illinois | 60612 | United States |
| Carle on Vermilion | Danville | Illinois | 61832 | United States |
| Carle Physician Group-Effingham | Effingham | Illinois | 62401 | United States |
| Carle Physician Group-Mattoon/Charleston | Mattoon | Illinois | 61938 | United States |
| Carle Cancer Center | Urbana | Illinois | 61801 | United States |
| The Carle Foundation Hospital | Urbana | Illinois | 61801 | United States |
| Ochsner Medical Center Jefferson | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70121 | United States |
| Community Hospital of Anaconda | Anaconda | Montana | 59711 | United States |
| Billings Clinic Cancer Center | Billings | Montana | 59101 | United States |
| Bozeman Deaconess Hospital | Bozeman | Montana | 59715 | United States |
| Benefis Healthcare- Sletten Cancer Institute | Great Falls | Montana | 59405 | United States |
| Great Falls Clinic | Great Falls | Montana | 59405 | United States |
| Saint Peter's Community Hospital | Helena | Montana | 59601 | United States |
| Kalispell Regional Medical Center | Kalispell | Montana | 59901 | United States |
| Community Medical Hospital | Missoula | Montana | 59804 | United States |
| University of New Mexico Cancer Center | Albuquerque | New Mexico | 87102 | United States |
| Saint Alphonsus Medical Center-Baker City | Baker City | Oregon | 97814 | United States |
| Saint Alphonsus Medical Center-Ontario | Ontario | Oregon | 97914 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| VCU Massey Cancer Center at Stony Point | Richmond | Virginia | 23235 | United States |
| Virginia Commonwealth University/Massey Cancer Center | Richmond | Virginia | 23298 | United States |
| Marshfield Medical Center-Marshfield | Marshfield | Wisconsin | 54449 | United States |
| Billings Clinic-Cody | Cody | Wyoming | 82414 | United States |
| Welch Cancer Center | Sheridan | Wyoming | 82801 | United States |
| FHP Health Center-Guam | Tamuning | 96913 | Guam |
| Pan American Center for Oncology Trials LLC | San Juan | 00902 | Puerto Rico |
| 39320397 | Derived | Saucke MC, Jacobson N, McKinney G, Neuman HB. Role of the Surgeon in De-Escalating Emotion During a Breast Cancer Surgery Consultation: A Qualitative Study of Patients' Experiences in Alliance A231701CD. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;31(13):8873-8881. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16156-1. Epub 2024 Sep 25. |
| 37923529 | Derived | Zahrieh D, Croghan IT, Inselman JW, Mandrekar SJ. Guidelines for Data and Safety Monitoring in Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trials Using Case Studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2023 Nov;98(11):1712-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.02.019. |
| 36396308 | Derived | Schumacher JR, Zahrieh D, Chow S, Taylor J, Wills R, Hanlon BM, Rathouz PJ, Tucholka JL, Neuman HB. Increasing socioeconomically disadvantaged patients' engagement in breast cancer surgery decision-making through a shared decision-making intervention (A231701CD): protocol for a cluster randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 17;12(11):e063895. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063895. |
| Sites 3 and 4 |
20-26 weeks Usual Care (Participants receive care as per usual care), 10 weeks Implementation (Decision aid implemented at the corresponding clinic), 46-70 weeks Intervention (Participants receive a web-based decision aid intervention prior to the surgical consultation) and 14 Weeks Extended Enrollment Beyond Wave 7 (Participants receive a web-based decision aid intervention prior to the surgical consultation. The extended enrollment was to enrich the sample for the mixed methods components of the analysis.) |
| FG002 | Sites 5 and 6 | 56-68 weeks Usual Care (Participants receive care as per usual care), 10 weeks Implementation (Decision aid implemented at the corresponding clinic), 36-39 weeks Intervention (Participants receive a web-based decision aid intervention prior to the surgical consultation) and 1-10 Weeks Extended Enrollment Beyond Wave 7 (Participants receive a web-based decision aid intervention prior to the surgical consultation. The extended enrollment was to enrich the sample for the mixed methods components of the analysis.) |
| FG003 | Sites 7 and 8 | 70-71 weeks Usual Care (Participants receive care as per usual care), 10 weeks Implementation (Decision aid implemented at the corresponding clinic), 23-26 weeks Intervention (Participants receive a web-based decision aid intervention prior to the surgical consultation) and 12-15 Weeks Extended Enrollment Beyond Wave 7 (Participants receive a web-based decision aid intervention prior to the surgical consultation. The extended enrollment was to enrich the sample for the mixed methods components of the analysis.) |
| FG004 | Sites 9 and 10 | 75-80 weeks Usual Care (Participants receive care as per usual care), 10 weeks Implementation (Decision aid implemented at the corresponding clinic), 10-13 weeks Intervention (Participants receive a web-based decision aid intervention prior to the surgical consultation) and 18 Weeks Extended Enrollment Beyond Wave 7 (Participants receive a web-based decision aid intervention prior to the surgical consultation. The extended enrollment was to enrich the sample for the mixed methods components of the analysis.) |
| FG005 | Surgeons | Surgeons accrual across sites |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Implementation |
|
| Intervention |
|
| Extended Enrollment Beyond Wave 7 |
|
All stepped-wedge design participants excluding 1 ineligible in UC and 2 refused follow-up at baseline in DA; all extended enrollment beyond wave 7-DA and all surgeons.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | UC (Usual Care) | Participants receive care as per usual care. Participant assignment to usual care or decision aid intervention was determined by the phase the site was in at time of participant enrollment. |
| BG001 | DA (Decision Aid Intervention) | Participants receive a web-based decision aid intervention prior to the surgical consultation. Participant assignment to usual care or decision aid intervention was determined by the phase the site was in at time of participant enrollment. |
| BG002 | Extended Enrollment Beyond Wave 7-DA (Decision Aid Intervention) | Participants receive a web-based decision aid intervention prior to the surgical consultation. The extended enrollment was to enrich the sample for the mixed methods components of the analysis. |
| BG003 | Surgeons | Participants consent for participation in site implementation activities, allowing their patients to receive the decision aid, a baseline survey, and audio-recording of their patient consultations. |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Age not collected on surgeons | Median | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Sex not collected on surgeons | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Other includes American Indian or Alaskan Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, Unknown/Not reported for UC, DA, and Extended Enrollment groups; Other includes Asian, Black, and Unknown/Not reported for Surgeons in order to avoid identifying participating surgeons. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||
| Socioeconomic Disadvantage | Socioeconomic disadvantage was assessed with the Area Deprivation Index measured at the zip+4 level and dichotomized | Socioeconomic disadvantage was not collected on surgeons | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Patient Power: Self-efficacy in Patient Physician Interactions | Power is defined as patients' self-perceived capacity to influence the decision-making encounter. This construct is measured using the Patient's Self-Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI)-5 point scale; the primary outcome measure is a total score ranging from 5-25, where higher scores indicate increased self-efficacy. The patient completes the PEPPI-5 questionnaire within 3 weeks post-surgical consultation. | All stepped wedge design participants who had PEPPI-5 data available excluding 5 UC (1 ineligible, 4 enrolled off-schedule) and 3 DA (2 refused follow-up at baseline, 1 enrolled off-schedule). | Posted | Median | Full Range | score on a scale | 3 weeks |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Patient Power: Active Patient Participation | Power is also separately measured by the validated Active Patient Participation Behaviors System to assess active patient participation during the surgeon consultation and is measured off the audio-recording of the consultation; a summary measure of patient's active involvement in the interaction is coded by the study team and represents a total count of patients' communicative behaviors (i.e., count of patient asking questions, count of patient assertive responses and count of patient expressions of concern) ranging from 0-114, where higher scores indicate increased active patient participation. The consultation for a patient will typically be study day 1 (day of registration). | All stepped wedge design participants who had active patient participation behaviors data available excluding 5 UC (1 ineligible and 4 enrolled off-schedule) and 3 DA (2 refused follow-up at baseline and 1 enrolled off-schedule). | Posted | Median | Full Range | count of patient communicative behaviors | 1 day |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Patient Knowledge | Patient knowledge is measured from 5 knowledge questions in the Decision Quality Instrument-Breast Surgery survey, with a percent correct recorded as the secondary outcome measure, ranging from 0-100%. The patient completes the Decision Quality Instrument-Breast Surgery survey within 3 weeks post-surgical consultation. | Not Posted | Up to 3 weeks | Participants | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Concordance Between Personal Values and Surgery Received | This is a binary outcome reflecting whether surgery received (mastectomy; lumpectomy) was concordant or not with the patient's personal values. The patient's personal values are measured from 3 questions on the Decision Quality Instrument (DQI)-Breast Surgery survey; each question ranges from 0 (not at all important) to 10 (extremely important). . The patient completes the DQI within 3 weeks post-consultation. The method by Sepucha et al (2012) will be applied to determine concordance between personal values and surgery received. | Not Posted | Up to 3 weeks | Participants |
827 days
Serious and other [non-serious] adverse events were not collected or assessed as part of the study for all participants. All-cause mortality was reported for patients through post-operative chart review. All-cause mortality was not reported for surgeons.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | UC (Usual Care) | Participants receive care as per usual care. Participant assignment to usual care or decision aid intervention was determined by the phase the site was in at time of participant enrollment. | 1 | 264 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG001 | DA (Decision Aid Intervention) | Participants receive a web-based decision aid intervention prior to the surgical consultation. Participant assignment to usual care or decision aid intervention was determined by the phase the site was in at time of participant enrollment. | 1 | 309 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heather B. Neuman, MD, MS | University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health | 608-265-5852 | neuman@surgery.wisc.edu |
| Sep 28, 2023 |
| Prot_SAP_ICF_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000071960 | Breast Carcinoma In Situ |
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002278 | Carcinoma in Situ |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
|
|
|
|