Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Stirling | OTHER |
| University of Surrey | OTHER |
| Swansea University | OTHER |
| Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
People treated for breast cancer often live with an ongoing fear that the cancer will recur. This fear may develop and impact on their mental health and quality of life. The Mini-AFTERc study is a pilot trial of a brief cognitive behavioural communication intervention, designed to reduce fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in breast cancer patients. This pilot trial aims to determine the acceptability and practicality of introducing the Mini-AFTERc intervention into everyday practice, and inform the development of a full randomised controlled trial.
The objectives of this pilot trial are as follows:
This study is a multicentre controlled pilot trial of the Mini-AFTERc intervention and will take place in 4 breast cancer centres in NHS Scotland health boards, including Fife, Highlands, Lothian and Tayside. Two centres will deliver the intervention (Fife and Lothian) and 2 centres will deliver usual care to patients, acting as control centres (Highlands and Tayside). The project will be delivered in 3 phases:
Phase 1 will include the development and delivery of the Mini-AFTERc intervention training package for breast cancer nurses.
Phase 2 will include patient recruitment and data collection. There will be 2 intervention centres and 2 control centres across NHS Scotland. Patients who have completed their primary breast cancer treatment, will be screened for moderate FCR (scoring ≥10 and <15 on the Fear of Cancer Recurrence 4-item Scale; FCR4). Breast cancer nurses will deliver the intervention by telephone in intervention centres, which will be audio recorded. Patients will complete a satisfaction questionnaire after the intervention (CARE and MISS). Follow-up questionnaires measuring fear of cancer recurrence, anxiety and depression and quality of life outcomes (FCR4, HADS, EQ-5D) will be delivered via a smartphone app at 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months following intervention or 3 weeks, 5 weeks and 13 weeks following screening for the control group. Semi-structured interviews with 20% of patients and all nurses will be conducted to assess experiences and acceptability of the intervention.
Phase 3 will conduct data analysis and trial evaluation. Screening and follow-up data will be quantitatively analysed, including structured equation modelling. Interviews will be subject to framework analysis based on normalisation process theory (NPT). The pilot trial will be systematically evaluated using a process of decision making after pilot and feasibility trials (ADePT).
The findings will help to understand if this brief intervention can be implemented in everyday practice and can reduce FCR. They will also inform the practicality of implementation of a larger-scale randomised trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Patient will receive the Mini-AFTERc intervention after completion of primary breast cancer treatment. |
|
| Control group | No Intervention | Patients will receive usual care after completion of primary breast cancer treatment. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mini-AFTERc | Behavioral | Structured 30-45 minute telephone discussion based on health psychology theory and CBT principles. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient satisfaction with nurse communication during the Mini-AFTERc intervention | Assessed using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure, validated for use in secondary care (Mercer et al. 2004). The CARE measure asks patient to rate their nurses' communication skills on 10 communication and empathy domains (e.g. 'How was your nurse at fully understanding your concerns?'). Patients rate nurses from 1 ('Poor') to 5 ('Excellent') for each of the 10 domains. | 1 week post intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fear of cancer recurrence level - FCR4 | The FCR4 is a 4-item measure designed to assess patient anxiety, worry and strong feelings associated with the return of cancer (e.g. 'I am afraid that my cancer may recur'). The research group has validated the FCR4 as an accurate measure of cancer recurrence fears in breast cancer patients that is fit for routine use in clinical services (Humphris, Watson, Sharpe, & Ozakinci, 2018). Each question in the FCR4 is rated by the patient on a scale of 1 ('Not at all') to 5 ('All the time'). A cumulative score of ≥10 (60 Percentile) across all 4 items is defined as 'moderate' fear of cancer recurrence and a cumulative score of ≥15 is defined as 'high' fear of cancer recurrence. |
Not provided
Patient inclusion criteria for screening:
Patient inclusion criteria for trial:
Patient exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gerry M Humphris, PhD | Contact | +44 (0) 1334463565 | gmh4@st-andrews.ac.uk | |
| Calum T McHale, PhD | Contact | +44 (0)1334461895 | ctm2@st-andrews.ac.uk |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Queen Margaret Hospital | Dunfermline | NHS Fife | KY12 0SU | United Kingdom | ||
| Raigmore Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29624779 | Background | Davidson J, Malloch M, Humphris G. A single-session intervention (the Mini-AFTERc) for fear of cancer recurrence: A feasibility study. Psychooncology. 2018 Nov;27(11):2668-2670. doi: 10.1002/pon.4724. Epub 2018 Apr 30. No abstract available. | |
| 29471823 | Background | Humphris GM, Watson E, Sharpe M, Ozakinci G. Unidimensional scales for fears of cancer recurrence and their psychometric properties: the FCR4 and FCR7. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Feb 9;16(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0850-x. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| C000719212 | Pathophobia |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER_GOV |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 3 months |
| Depression and anxiety symptoms - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) | The HADS is a 14-item assessment tool used to screen for anxiety and depression the general medical population (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983). The HADS is well established tool and has been employed in a multitude of medical settings, including oncology, to assess patients' mental health (Hartung et al., 2017; Vodermaier & Millman, 2011). The HADS assesses two domains, depressionand anxiety. Patients report symptoms of depression and anxiety in the last week on a 4-point Likert scale, from 0 (e.g. "Not at all") to 3 (e.g. "Most of the time"). | 3 months |
| Health-related quality of life - EuroQol 5 Dimension Measure of Quality of Life (EQ-5D) | The EQ-5D is a standardised instrument of health-related quality of life, developed by the EuroQol Group (Herdman et al., 2011). The EQ-5D assesses 5 dimensions including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D contains 6-items, 5 of these items assess each of the 5 dimensions and are rated on a 5-level (5L) scale. The final item is a measure of health state, which is rated on a scale of 0 ('worst imaginable health state') to 100 (Best imaginable health state'). | 3 months |
| Nurses' perceived acceptability of the Mini-AFTERc intervention as part of routine cancer care - Determined by theory driven semi-structured interviews | Semi-structured interviews with patients will explain and evaluate the underlying mechanisms of implementing the Mini-AFTERc intervention into routine cancer care from the perspective of breast cancer nurses. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) will provide a theory-driven framework for addressing this outcome. NPT aims to provide coherence, as well as assessments of cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring (Murray et al. 2010). | Within 1 month of delivering final intervention |
| Recruitment rate | Assess number of patients recruited at each site, including those who decline to participate. | Duration of the pilot trial (Approx 2 years) |
| Retention rate | Assess number of patients who complete the trial. | Duration of the pilot trial (Approx 2 years) |
| Attrition rate | Assess number of patients who do not complete the trial, withdraw or drop-out. | Duration of the pilot trial (Approx 2 years) |
| Patient perceived acceptability of the Mini-AFTERc intervention as part of routine cancer care - Determined by theory driven semi-structured interviews | Semi-structured interviews with patients will explain and evaluate the underlying mechanisms of implementing the Mini-AFTERc intervention into routine cancer care from the perspective of patients. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) will provide a theory-driven framework for addressing this outcome. NPT aims to provide coherence, as well as assessments of cognitive participation, collective action and reflexive monitoring (Murray et al. 2010). | Within 1 month of final follow-up questionnaire |
| Inverness |
| NHS Highlands |
| IV2 3UJ |
| United Kingdom |
| Western General Hospital | Edinburgh | NHS Lothain | EH4 2XU | United Kingdom |
| Perth Royal Infirmary | Perth | NHS Tayside | PH1 1NX | United Kingdom |
| 6880820 | Background | Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. |
| 21479777 | Background | Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9. |
| 15528286 | Background | Mercer SW, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GC. The consultation and relational empathy (CARE) measure: development and preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004 Dec;21(6):699-705. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh621. Epub 2004 Nov 4. |
| 28748105 | Background | Cruickshank S, Steel E, Fenlon D, Armes J, Scanlon K, Banks E, Humphris G. A feasibility study of the Mini-AFTER telephone intervention for the management of fear of recurrence in breast cancer survivors: a mixed-methods study protocol. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Jul 20;4:22. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0161-8. eCollection 2018. |
| 18492319 | Background | Humphris G, Ozakinci G. The AFTER intervention: a structured psychological approach to reduce fears of recurrence in patients with head and neck cancer. Br J Health Psychol. 2008 May;13(Pt 2):223-30. doi: 10.1348/135910708X283751. |
| 24160371 | Background | Bugge C, Williams B, Hagen S, Logan J, Glazener C, Pringle S, Sinclair L. A process for Decision-making after Pilot and feasibility Trials (ADePT): development following a feasibility study of a complex intervention for pelvic organ prolapse. Trials. 2013 Oct 25;14:353. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-353. |
| 20961442 | Background | Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, MacFarlane A, Ballini L, Dowrick C, Finch T, Kennedy A, Mair F, O'Donnell C, Ong BN, Rapley T, Rogers A, May C. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010 Oct 20;8:63. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-63. |
| 28654189 | Background | Hartung TJ, Friedrich M, Johansen C, Wittchen HU, Faller H, Koch U, Brahler E, Harter M, Keller M, Schulz H, Wegscheider K, Weis J, Mehnert A. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as screening instruments for depression in patients with cancer. Cancer. 2017 Nov 1;123(21):4236-4243. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30846. Epub 2017 Jun 27. |
| 21898134 | Background | Vodermaier A, Millman RD. Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as a screening tool in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2011 Dec;19(12):1899-908. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1251-4. Epub 2011 Sep 4. |
| 33324299 | Derived | Brandt NG, McHale CT, Humphris GM. Development and Testing of a Novel Measure to Assess Fidelity of Implementation: Example of the Mini-AFTERc Intervention. Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 25;11:601813. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.601813. eCollection 2020. |
| 32399254 | Derived | McHale CT, Cruickshank S, Torrens C, Armes J, Fenlon D, Banks E, Kelsey T, Humphris GM. A controlled pilot trial of a nurse-led intervention (Mini-AFTERc) to manage fear of cancer recurrence in patients affected by breast cancer. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 May 7;6:60. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00610-4. eCollection 2020. |