Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Primary objective:
To demonstrate that tralokinumab in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) is superior to placebo in combination with TCS in treating severe AD in subjects who are not adequately controlled with or have contraindications to oral cyclosporine A (CSA).
Secondary objectives:
To evaluate the efficacy of tralokinumab in combination with TCS on severity and extent of AD, itch, and health-related quality of life compared to placebo in combination with TCS.
To evaluate the safety of tralokinumab in combination with TCS when treating severe AD in subjects who are not adequately controlled with or have contraindications to oral CSA compared to placebo in combination with TCS.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tralokinumab + TCS | Experimental | 4 subcutaneous (SC) injections of tralokinumab 150 mg as a loading dose on Day 0, followed by 2 SC injections of tralokinumab 150 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) regimen for 26 weeks. The last administration of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) occurred at Week 24. From Day 0 to Week 24, a Topical corticosteroid (TCS) cream was dispensed to the participants at each IMP dosing visit (e.g., Q2W). Participants were instructed to treat active lesions as needed and to discontinue the TCS treatment when control was achieved. |
|
| Placebo + TCS | Placebo Comparator | 4 subcutaneous (SC) injections of placebo as a loading dose on Day 0, followed by 2 SC injections of placebo every 2 weeks (Q2W) regimen for 26 weeks. The last administration of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) occurred at Week 24. From Day 0 to Week 24, a Topical corticosteroid (TCS) cream was dispensed to the participants at each IMP dosing visit (e.g., Q2W). Participants were instructed to treat active lesions as needed and to discontinue the TCS treatment when control was achieved. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tralokinumab | Drug | Tralokinumab is a human recombinant monoclonal antibody of the IgG4 subclass that specifically binds to human IL-13 and blocks interaction with the IL-13 receptors. It is presented as a liquid formulation for subcutaneous (SC) administration. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 16 | EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and/or more extensive condition. | Week 0 to Week 16 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 16 | Subjects will assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours using an 11-point NRS ('Worst Daily Pruritus NRS') with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'. | Week 0 to Week 16 |
Not provided
Key Inclusion Criteria:
Key Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Expert | LEO Pharma | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Brussels | 1090 | Belgium | |||
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
After the participant gave informed consent, they went through a 2- to 6-week screening period. Eligibility was assessed at the (first) screening visit and on Day 0 (hereinafter "baseline") prior to randomisation.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Tralokinumab + TCS | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at baseline followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jun 15, 2020 | Sep 21, 2021 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Other | Placebo contains the same excipients in the same concentration only lacking tralokinumab. |
|
| Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 16 |
SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the extent and severity of AD lesions, along with subjective symptoms. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease. |
| Week 0 to Week 16 |
| Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 16 | DLQI is a validated questionnaire with content specific to those with dermatology conditions. It consists of 10 items addressing the subject's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the last week such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all ∕not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; 3 = very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (0 to 30); a high score is indicative of a poor HRQoL. | Week 0 to Week 16 |
| Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 16 | IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). | Week 16 |
| At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 26 | EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and/or more extensive condition. | Week 0 to Week 26 |
| Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 26 | Subjects will assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours using an 11-point numeric rating scale ('Worst Daily Pruritus NRS') with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'. | Week 0 to Week 26 |
| Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 26 | SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the extent and severity of AD lesions, along with subjective symptoms. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease. | Week 0 to Week 26 |
| Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 26 | DLQI is a validated questionnaire with content specific to those with dermatology conditions. It consists of 10 items addressing the subject's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the last week such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all ∕not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; 3 = very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (0 to 30); a high score is indicative of a poor HRQoL. | Week 0 to Week 26 |
| Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 26 | IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). | Week 26 |
| Frequency of Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) From Week 0 to Week 40 | Presence of ADA from Week 0 to Week 40 was measured. Data were reported in the following categories: positive (presence of ADA at baseline and/or presence of ADA at at least 1 post-baseline assessment), perishing (presence of ADA at baseline and absence of ADA at all post-baseline assessments), negative (absence of ADA at all assessments), no post-baseline ADA assessment. | Week 0 to Week 40 |
| Number of Adverse Events From Week 0 to Week 40 | All adverse events are presented below under Adverse Events | Week 0 to Week 40 |
| Brussels |
| 1200 |
| Belgium |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Edegem | 2650 | Belgium |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Ghent | 9000 | Belgium |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Ghent | B-9000 | Belgium |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Herstal | B-4040 | Belgium |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Kortrijk | 8500 | Belgium |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Leuven | 3000 | Belgium |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Liège | 4000 | Belgium |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Loverval | 6280 | Belgium |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Maldegem | 9990 | Belgium |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Karlovy Vary | 36001 | Czechia |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Kutná Hora | 284 01 | Czechia |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Ostrava | 70852 | Czechia |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Pardubice | 53002 | Czechia |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Prague | 11000 | Czechia |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Prague | 120 00 | Czechia |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Prague | 130 00 | Czechia |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Prague | 15006 | Czechia |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Prague | 180 81 | Czechia |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Grenoble | 38000 | France |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Nice | 06202 | France |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Paris | 75010 | France |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Pierre-Bénite | 69495 | France |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Valence | 26000 | France |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Aachen | 52074 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Augsburg | 86150 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Bad Bentheim | 48455 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Berlin | 10117, | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Dresden | 01307 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Dülmen | 48249 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Frankfurt | 60590 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Halle | 06097 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Hanover | 30159 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Jena | 07743 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Kiel | 24105 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Mainz | 55128 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | München | 80337 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Osnabrück | 49074 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Selters | 56242 | Germany |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Bialystok | 15-375 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Bochnia | 32-700 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Bydgoszcz | 85-094 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Gdansk | 80-546 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Krakow | 30-149 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Krakow | 31-530 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Krakow | 31-559 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Lodz | 90-242 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Lodz | 90-752 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Lublin | 20-081 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Poznan | 60-369 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Rzeszów | 35-312 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Warsaw | 01-817 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Warsaw | 02-625 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Warsaw | 02-953 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Wroclaw | 51-685 | Poland |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Granada | Andalusia | 18014 | Spain |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Alicante | 03010 | Spain |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Barcelona | 08036 | Spain |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Barcelona | 08041 | Spain |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Barcelona | 08907 | Spain |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Bilbao | 48013 | Spain |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Córdoba | 14004 | Spain |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Madrid | 28006 | Spain |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Madrid | 28046 | Spain |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Madrid | 28942 | Spain |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Pamplona | 31008 | Spain |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Seville | 41007 | Spain |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Bradford | BD5 0NA | United Kingdom |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Cottingham | HU16 5JQ | United Kingdom |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Kirkcaldy | KY2 5AH | United Kingdom |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | London | E11 1NR | United Kingdom |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Southampton | SO16 6YD | United Kingdom |
| Leo Pharma Investigationel Site | Wakefield | WF1 4DG | United Kingdom |
| FG001 |
| Placebo + TCS |
Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at baseline followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Tralokinumab + TCS | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at baseline followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. |
| BG001 | Placebo + TCS | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at baseline followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age at onset of atopic dermatitis | The number of participants analysed is different from the number of participants randomised due to missing data. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Years |
| ||||||||||||||
| Duration of atopic dermatitis | The number of participants analysed is different from the number of participants randomised due to missing data. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Years |
| ||||||||||||||
| Body surface area with atopic dermatitis | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Percentage affected |
| |||||||||||||||
| Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) | IGA is used to evaluate the severity of atopic dermatitis. It is a 5-point score ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). | The number of participants analysed is different from the number of participants randomised due to missing data. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||
| Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) | EASI is used to evaluate the extent and severity of atopic dermatitis. It is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72 with a higher score indicating a more extensive and/or severe condition. | The number of participants analysed is different from the number of participants randomised due to missing data. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Units on a scale |
| |||||||||||||
| Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) | SCORAD is used to evaluate the extent and severity of atopic dermatitis as well as subjective symptoms. The score ranges from 0 to 103 with a higher score indicating a more extensive and/or severe condition. | The number of participants analysed is different from the number of participants randomised due to missing data. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Units on a scale |
| |||||||||||||
| Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) | DLQI is used by the participant to evaluate the impact of their condition on 10 different aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the last week. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much). The total score which is the sum of the 10 items ranges from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a poorer HRQoL. | The number of participants analysed is different from the number of participants randomised due to missing data. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Units on a scale |
| |||||||||||||
| Worst Daily Pruritus numeric rating scale (NRS) (weekly average) | Worst Daily Pruritus NRS is used by the participant to evaluate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours. The score ranges from 0 ('no itch') to 10 ('worst itch imaginable'). | The number of participants analysed is different from the number of participants randomised due to missing data. | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Units on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 16 | EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and/or more extensive condition. | Full analysis set (FAS). Of the 277 participants randomised to initial treatment, 275 were treated. Therefore, the FAS consisted of 275 participants (138 participants in the tralokinumab+TCS group + 137 participants in the placebo+TCS group). | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | Week 0 to Week 16 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 16 | Subjects will assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours using an 11-point NRS ('Worst Daily Pruritus NRS') with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'. | Participants in the full analysis set with a Worst Daily Pruritus NRS (weekly average) of at least 4 at baseline (Week 0). | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | Week 0 to Week 16 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 16 | SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the extent and severity of AD lesions, along with subjective symptoms. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease. | Full analysis set (FAS). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Week 0 to Week 16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 16 | DLQI is a validated questionnaire with content specific to those with dermatology conditions. It consists of 10 items addressing the subject's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the last week such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all ∕not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; 3 = very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (0 to 30); a high score is indicative of a poor HRQoL. | Full Set Analysis (FAS). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Week 0 to Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 16 | IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). | Full analysis set (FAS). | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | Week 16 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | At Least 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) From Week 0 to Week 26 | EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI is a composite index with scores ranging from 0 to 72, with higher values indicating more severe and/or more extensive condition. | Full analysis set (FAS). | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | Week 0 to Week 26 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Reduction of Worst Daily Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Weekly Average) of at Least 4 From Week 0 to Week 26 | Subjects will assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours using an 11-point numeric rating scale ('Worst Daily Pruritus NRS') with 0 indicating 'no itch' and 10 indicating 'worst itch imaginable'. | Participants in the full analysis set with a Worst Daily Pruritus NRS (weekly average) of at least 4 at baseline (Week 0). | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | Week 0 to Week 26 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Week 0 to Week 26 | SCORAD is a validated tool to evaluate the extent and severity of AD lesions, along with subjective symptoms. The maximum total score is 103, with higher values indicating more severe disease. | Full analysis set (FAS). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Week 0 to Week 26 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score From Week 0 to Week 26 | DLQI is a validated questionnaire with content specific to those with dermatology conditions. It consists of 10 items addressing the subject's perception of the impact of their skin disease on different aspects of their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) over the last week such as dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0 = not at all ∕not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; 3 = very much). The total score is the sum of the 10 items (0 to 30); a high score is indicative of a poor HRQoL. | Full Set Analysis (FAS). | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Week 0 to Week 26 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost Clear) at Week 26 | IGA is an instrument used in clinical trials to rate the severity of the subject's global AD and is based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe). | Full analysis set (FAS). | Posted | Number | Percentage of responders | Week 26 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Frequency of Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) From Week 0 to Week 40 | Presence of ADA from Week 0 to Week 40 was measured. Data were reported in the following categories: positive (presence of ADA at baseline and/or presence of ADA at at least 1 post-baseline assessment), perishing (presence of ADA at baseline and absence of ADA at all post-baseline assessments), negative (absence of ADA at all assessments), no post-baseline ADA assessment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 0 to Week 40 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Adverse Events From Week 0 to Week 40 | All adverse events are presented below under Adverse Events | Posted | Number | number of adverse events | Week 0 to Week 40 |
|
|
Treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26), safety follow-up period (Week 26 to Week 40).
The analysis was conducted based on the safety analysis set which consisted of subjects exposed to at least 1 dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP e.g., tralokinumab or placebo).
In the category Other adverse events (AEs), all AEs will be reported in the safety follow-up period, whereas a frequency threshold at 2% AEs will apply for the treatment period, except that all AEs will be reported if also part of the safety follow-up period.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Treatment Period: Tralokinumab+TCS | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with tralokinumab every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants received a loading dose of 600 mg tralokinumab at baseline followed by a dose of 300 mg tralokinumab Q2W from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. For the treatment period, only AEs with a frequency above 2% will be reported. The exception is that AEs reported in the safety follow-up period will also be reported for the treatment period. The total AEs will represent all AEs reported in the treatment period. | 0 | 138 | 1 | 138 | 107 | 138 |
| EG001 | Treatment Period: Placebo+TCS | Participants in the treatment period (Week 0 to Week 26) treated with placebo every second week (Q2W) and topical corticosteroid (TCS) as needed. Participants were administered placebo at baseline followed by administration of placebo every second week from Week 2. The last dose of IMP was administered at Week 24. For the treatment period, only AEs with a frequency above 2% will be reported. The exception is that AEs reported in the safety follow-up period will also be reported for the treatment period. The total AEs will represent all AEs reported in the treatment period. | 0 | 137 | 5 | 137 | 108 | 137 |
| EG002 | Safety Follow-up Period: Tralokinumab+TCS | Participants who spent any amount of time in the safety follow-up period, independently of the treatment(s) received before. No treatment was administered to the participants during the safety follow-up period. Eligible participants were invited to enter a long-term extension trial conducted under a separate protocol (LP0162-1337, ECZTEND). For the safety follow-up period, all AEs will be reported. | 0 | 75 | 0 | 75 | 4 | 75 |
| EG003 | Safety Follow-up Period: Placebo+TCS | Participants who spent any amount of time in the safety follow-up period, independently of the treatment(s) received before. No treatment was administered to the participants during the safety follow-up period. Eligible participants were invited to enter a long-term extension trial conducted under a separate protocol (LP0162-1337, ECZTEND). For the safety follow-up period, all AEs will be reported. | 0 | 83 | 1 | 83 | 6 | 83 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seizure | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaphylactic reaction | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral nerve injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Squamous cell carcinoma of skin | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depressed mood | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermatitis atopic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viral upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Folliculitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Conjunctivitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oral herpes | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rhinitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermatitis infected | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Herpes simplex | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tonsillitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermatitis atopic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diffuse alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alopecia areata | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site pain | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Influenza like illness | General disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Conjunctivitis allergic | Eye disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry eye | Eye disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin abrasion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 20.0 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Lower respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Night sweats | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Diverticulum intestinal | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Renal cyst | Renal and urinary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Basal cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disclosure | LEO Pharma A/S | 44 94 58 88 | +45 | disclosure@leo-pharma.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 21, 2020 | Sep 21, 2021 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003876 | Dermatitis, Atopic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012873 | Skin Diseases, Genetic |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D003872 | Dermatitis |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017443 | Skin Diseases, Eczematous |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C574065 | tralokinumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 65-84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Czechia |
|
|
| Poland |
|
|
| United Kingdom |
|
|
| France |
|
|
| Germany |
|
|
| Spain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Severe Disease |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Superiority |
The null hypothesis of no difference between Tralokinumab+TCS and placebo+TCS was tested at a 5% significance level against the 2-sided alternative that there was a difference. |
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|