Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R01HL137734-01A1 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Connecticut | OTHER |
| Northeastern University | OTHER |
| Brigham and Women's Hospital | OTHER |
| National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this research study is to develop a smartphone application capable of monitoring paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) in people who have survived a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) or people who are at risk for a stroke and are age 50 and older. The study team plans to develop a highly effective and easy to use cardiovascular surveillance system to monitor patients for pAF on a nearly continuous basis. People involved in the development of this system include patients, their caregivers, health care providers, and computer programmers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Testing devices plus Cardea Solo device by Cardiac Insight for 14-day period. |
|
| Control Group | Active Comparator | Only Cardea Solo device by Cardiac Insight for 14-day period. |
|
| Intervention Group for Extended Use | Experimental | 30-additional days of extended use of testing devices for adherence plus Kardia Mobile ECG device by AliveCor. |
|
| Control Group for Extended Use | No Intervention | No device usage for 30-days following completion of the original 14-day period. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing Devices | Device | Pulsewatch system testing application on smartphone with smartwatch. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Usability of Pulsewatch System (System Usability Scale & Rating Scale) at 14 Days Post the First Randomization | System usability scale, self-reported, of likes, dislikes, and problems encountered with the smartphone application and smartwatch. Each item regarding likes and dislikes will be scored 1-5 (1= strongly disagree; 5= strongly agree or Didn't use). Problem encountered will be scored with yes or no options with space provided for explanations. Also, using Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) App Classification questions will capture the participants' experience with the application. Each MARS item uses a 5-point scale (1=inadequate, 2=poor, 3=acceptable, 4=Good, 5=Excellent) and sub-scales will have an average mean to indicate the overall rating of the application. Number of participants with SUS > 68 was reported in the Outcome Measure Data Table | Assessed 14 days post the first randomization |
| The Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Detected by Smartwatch at the 14 Day Trial Period | This outcome was measured by the number of atrial fibrillation episodes identified by the smartwatch biosensors. This was conducted using two approaches. Firstly, the Pulsewatch app sent a message to participants to remain still and perform a 30-sec ECG self-check (wrist electrode, high accuracy) should they have an AF episode detected. The second approach involved the cancellation of cyclical frequencies, seen in accelerometer data, from the photoplethysmogram (PPG) signal. Thus, these two approaches were effectively used to recover some data segments contaminated by MNA or by poor signal quality and correctly identified the presence or absence of AF. Once MN artifacts were corrected, we looked at patterns to analyze pulse waveforms for AF detection, including discrimination of PVCs and PACs | Assessed throughout 14 day trial period |
| The Number of Participants With Detection of Atrial Fibrillation by a Patch Monitor (Confirmed by Cardiologist Overread) at 14 Days Post the First Randomization. | Episodes of atrial fibrillation was identified by the gold-standard monitor (Cardea Solo by Cardiac Insight). The Cardiac Insight patches have a module chip inside the sensor that stores the data being collected over the 14-days. After the participants returned the patches at the end of the 14-day monitoring period, a trained study staff removed the modules and placed them into the Cardiac insight smart cable to be uploaded to a UMass Medical School server. The ECG readings are then read by a board-certified cardiologist to confirm true atrial fibrillation detection. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Anxiety Symptoms at Baseline and at the Last Study Visit 30 Days Post the Second Randomization. | Anxiety will be assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7), a revised version of the anxiety module from the Patient Health Questionnaire, which consists of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for generalized anxiety disorder over the past 2 weeks. The GAD-7 score ranges from 0-27 with scores of 5, 10 and 15 representing validated cut-points for mild, moderate and severe levels of anxiety symptoms, with a score ≥10 having high sensitivity (0.89) and specificity (0.82) for psychiatrist diagnosed anxiety disorder and correlates significantly with health-related QoL. This change in outcome was between baseline and the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Timothy Fitzgibbons, MD, PhD | UMass Medical School | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMass Chan Medical School | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01655 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38015598 | Derived | Ding EY, Tran KV, Lessard D, Wang Z, Han D, Mohagheghian F, Mensah Otabil E, Noorishirazi K, Mehawej J, Filippaios A, Naeem S, Gottbrecht MF, Fitzgibbons TP, Saczynski JS, Barton B, Chon K, McManus DD. Accuracy, Usability, and Adherence of Smartwatches for Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Older Adults After Stroke: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Cardio. 2023 Nov 28;7:e45137. doi: 10.2196/45137. | |
| 36780211 | Derived | Han D, Ding EY, Cho C, Jung H, Dickson EL, Mohagheghian F, Peitzsch AG, DiMezza D, Tran KV, McManus DD, Chon KH. A Smartwatch System for Continuous Monitoring of Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults After Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: Application Design Study. JMIR Cardio. 2023 Feb 13;7:e41691. doi: 10.2196/41691. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients were either randomized into the intervention or control arm of the study. The control patients were given a gold-standard cardiac monitor patch (2 patches over 14 days) but were not offered the use of the Pulsewatch system. Thereafter, we re-randomized the 120 participants into a 1:1 randomization of control group (n=60) and intervention group (n=60) to continue using the device for an additional 30 days. Control group did not receive any devices during this time.
The study recruitment period was from September 2019 to September 2021. Participants were recruited from neurology and cardiology clinics at UMass Memorial and the Ambulatory Care Center, respectively. After participants were agreeable to joining the study, we gave them an IRB-stamped consent form that detailed the study's protocol. All study staff members were trained properly and had a complete understanding of study-related documentation to help answer any questions participants may have.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Intervention Group | Testing devices plus Cardea Solo device by Cardiac Insight for 14-day period. Testing Devices: Pulsewatch system testing application on smartphone with smartwatch. Cardea Solo by Cardiac Insight: Gold-standard cardiac monitor for comparison of testing devices. |
| FG001 | Control Group | Only Cardea Solo device by Cardiac Insight for 14-day period. Cardea Solo by Cardiac Insight: Gold-standard cardiac monitor for comparison of testing devices. |
| FG002 | Intervention Group for Extended Use | 30-additional days of extended use of testing devices for adherence plus Kardia Mobile ECG device by AliveCor. Testing Devices: Pulsewatch system testing application on smartphone with smartwatch. Kardia Mobile by AliveCor: Mobile ECG device for comparison of testing devices during the extended use period. |
| FG003 | Control Group for Extended Use | No device usage for 30-days following completion of the original 14-day period. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14-day Intervention & Control Period |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| 30-day Period (Extension 44 Days) |
|
Participants in the "Intervention Group for Extended Use" and "Control Group for Extended Use" did not complete baseline assessments as they are a continuation of the arms
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Intervention Group | Testing devices plus Cardea Solo device by Cardiac Insight for 14-day period. Testing Devices: Pulsewatch system testing application on smartphone with smartwatch. Cardea Solo by Cardiac Insight: Gold-standard cardiac monitor for comparison of testing devices. |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Usability of Pulsewatch System (System Usability Scale & Rating Scale) at 14 Days Post the First Randomization | System usability scale, self-reported, of likes, dislikes, and problems encountered with the smartphone application and smartwatch. Each item regarding likes and dislikes will be scored 1-5 (1= strongly disagree; 5= strongly agree or Didn't use). Problem encountered will be scored with yes or no options with space provided for explanations. Also, using Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) App Classification questions will capture the participants' experience with the application. Each MARS item uses a 5-point scale (1=inadequate, 2=poor, 3=acceptable, 4=Good, 5=Excellent) and sub-scales will have an average mean to indicate the overall rating of the application. Number of participants with SUS > 68 was reported in the Outcome Measure Data Table | Only the intervention group in the first phase had outcomes assessed for their Pulsewatch system usability. The overall number analyzed is 83 instead of 90 because 3 participants withdrew and the other 4 participants either had their device lost in transit or the data was not able to sync. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Assessed 14 days post the first randomization |
The adverse event data were monitored at baseline, at 14 days, and the 30 additional day follow-up for a total of approximately 44 days. Patient 1 - Serious adverse event occurred during the 14-day period. Patient 2 - Serious adverse event occurred during the 14-day period. Patient 3 - Serious adverse event occurred during the 14-day period. Patient 4 - Serious adverse event occurred during the 30-day extended period.
The definition of adverse event and/or serious adverse event used in this study was adapted from the clinicaltrials.gov definitions.
The study principal investigator and data safety monitor were promptly notified of all adverse and serious adverse events and were asked for guidance on what action should be taken.
All adverse events and serious adverse events were recorded in REDCap, a data collection tool, and also to the UMass Chan IRB
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Intervention Group | Testing devices plus Cardea Solo device by Cardiac Insight for 14-day period. Testing Devices: Pulsewatch system testing application on smartphone with smartwatch. Cardea Solo by Cardiac Insight: Gold-standard cardiac monitor for comparison of testing devices. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myocardial infarction and hospitalization | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | The patient had a myocardial infarction and was hospitalized for a period of time. This was completely unrelated to our study protocol/procedures. Once the patient was discharged, they withdrew and wanted to focus on recovering from the event. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skin irritation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Participants had skin irritation to the Cardiac Insight patch. They were asked to remove the Cardiac Insight patch and not place their second patch. |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edith Mensah Otabil | UMass Chan Medical School | 774-455-6574 | edith.mensahotabil@umassmed.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | May 27, 2020 | May 28, 2020 | Prot_008.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 20, 2018 | Nov 30, 2018 | SAP_003.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D001281 | Atrial Fibrillation |
| D001145 | Arrhythmias, Cardiac |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Cardea Solo by Cardiac Insight | Device | Gold-standard cardiac monitor for comparison of testing devices. |
|
| Kardia Mobile by AliveCor | Device | Mobile ECG device for comparison of testing devices during the extended use period. |
|
| Assessed at 14 days post the first randomization. |
| Assessed at baseline and at the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days) |
| Change in General Health MCS at Baseline and at the Last Study Visit 30 Days Post the Second Randomization (44 Days) | The Short Form (SF-12) health survey to assess health related quality of life, this validated instrument domains include general health questions and mental health related questions. Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate higher level of health. This change in outcome was between baseline and the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days). | Assessed at baseline and at the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days) |
| Change in General Health PCS at Baseline and at the Last Study Visit 30 Days Post the Second Randomization (44 Days) | The Short Form (SF-12) health survey to assess health related quality of life, this validated instrument domains include general health questions and physical health-related questions. Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a higher level of health. This outcome was assessed at baseline and at the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days). | Assessed at baseline and at the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days) |
| Change in Disease Management Self-Efficacy (The General Disease Management Scale) at Baseline and 14 Days Post the First Randomization | Self-efficacy for disease management is associated with engagement in health behaviors and with improved medication adherence. The General Disease Management scale is a 5-item scale assessing confidence in disease self-management (scores 0-50, higher scores = greater confidence, lower scores = lower confidence). This change in outcome was between baseline and 14 days post the first randomization. | Assessed at baseline and 14 days post the first randomization |
| Change in Symptom Management Self-Efficacy at Baseline and 14 Days Post Randomization | Self-efficacy for disease management is associated with engagement in health behaviors and with improved medication adherence. The Symptom Management scale is a 5-item scale assessing confidence in managing chronic disease symptoms (items tailored to the sample), with scores ranging from 0 to 100. A higher symptom management score indicates a higher confidence in managing symptoms. Conversely, a lower score indicates a lower confidence in managing symptoms. This change in outcome was between baseline and 14 days post randomization. | Assessed at baseline and 14 days post randomization |
| Change in Patient Activation Score at Baseline and at the Last Study Visit 30 Days Post the Second Randomization (44 Days) | Patient activation refers to a patient's ability and willingness to manage their health. Activation will be measured using the 10-item Consumer Health Activation Index (CHAI). Scores range from 10 to 60. A higher score indicates that the patient has higher activation for self-management of their condition. Conversely, a lower score indicates lower activation for self-management of their condition. This change in outcome was between the baseline and the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days) | Assessed at baseline and at the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days) |
| Change in Medication Adherence at Baseline and 14 Days Post the First Randomization | Medication adherence will be measured using the 12-item Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS), a well-validated measure of patient-reported adherence. The minimum to maximum ARMS score ranges from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate poorer adherence, and lower scores indicate better medication adherence. This change in outcome was between baseline and 14 days post the first randomization. | Assessed at baseline and 14 days post the first randomization |
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Control Group |
Only Cardea Solo device by Cardiac Insight for 14-day period. Cardea Solo by Cardiac Insight: Gold-standard cardiac monitor for comparison of testing devices. |
| BG002 | Intervention Group for Extended Use | 30-additional days of extended use of testing devices for adherence plus Kardia Mobile ECG device by AliveCor. Testing Devices: Pulsewatch system testing application on smartphone with smartwatch. Kardia Mobile by AliveCor: Mobile ECG device for comparison of testing devices during the extended use period. |
| BG003 | Control Group for Extended Use | No device usage for 30-days following completion of the original 14-day period. |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Intervention Group | Testing devices plus Cardea Solo device by Cardiac Insight for 14-day period. Testing Devices: Pulsewatch system testing application on smartphone with smartwatch. Cardea Solo by Cardiac Insight: Gold-standard cardiac monitor for comparison of testing devices. |
| OG001 | Control Group | Only Cardea Solo device by Cardiac Insight for 14-day period. Cardea Solo by Cardiac Insight: Gold-standard cardiac monitor for comparison of testing devices. |
| OG002 | Intervention Group for Extended Use | 30-additional days of extended use of testing devices for adherence plus Kardia Mobile ECG device by AliveCor. Testing Devices: Pulsewatch system testing application on smartphone with smartwatch. Kardia Mobile by AliveCor: Mobile ECG device for comparison of testing devices during the extended use period. |
| OG003 | Control Group for Extended Use | No device usage for 30-days following completion of the original 14-day period. |
|
|
| Primary | The Number of Participants With Atrial Fibrillation Detected by Smartwatch at the 14 Day Trial Period | This outcome was measured by the number of atrial fibrillation episodes identified by the smartwatch biosensors. This was conducted using two approaches. Firstly, the Pulsewatch app sent a message to participants to remain still and perform a 30-sec ECG self-check (wrist electrode, high accuracy) should they have an AF episode detected. The second approach involved the cancellation of cyclical frequencies, seen in accelerometer data, from the photoplethysmogram (PPG) signal. Thus, these two approaches were effectively used to recover some data segments contaminated by MNA or by poor signal quality and correctly identified the presence or absence of AF. Once MN artifacts were corrected, we looked at patterns to analyze pulse waveforms for AF detection, including discrimination of PVCs and PACs | Control, Intervention Group for Extended Use, and Control Group for Extended Use Groups analyses are not applicable. The number of participants analyzed is 89 because one participant's device was lost in transit so we were unable to get the device to extract the data. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Assessed throughout 14 day trial period |
|
|
|
| Primary | The Number of Participants With Detection of Atrial Fibrillation by a Patch Monitor (Confirmed by Cardiologist Overread) at 14 Days Post the First Randomization. | Episodes of atrial fibrillation was identified by the gold-standard monitor (Cardea Solo by Cardiac Insight). The Cardiac Insight patches have a module chip inside the sensor that stores the data being collected over the 14-days. After the participants returned the patches at the end of the 14-day monitoring period, a trained study staff removed the modules and placed them into the Cardiac insight smart cable to be uploaded to a UMass Medical School server. The ECG readings are then read by a board-certified cardiologist to confirm true atrial fibrillation detection. | Intervention Group for Extended Use and Control Group for Extended Use analyses are not applicable. One participant did not activate their Cardea solo device and one participant could discontinued wearing the device due to allergic reaction. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Assessed at 14 days post the first randomization. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Anxiety Symptoms at Baseline and at the Last Study Visit 30 Days Post the Second Randomization. | Anxiety will be assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7), a revised version of the anxiety module from the Patient Health Questionnaire, which consists of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria for generalized anxiety disorder over the past 2 weeks. The GAD-7 score ranges from 0-27 with scores of 5, 10 and 15 representing validated cut-points for mild, moderate and severe levels of anxiety symptoms, with a score ≥10 having high sensitivity (0.89) and specificity (0.82) for psychiatrist diagnosed anxiety disorder and correlates significantly with health-related QoL. This change in outcome was between baseline and the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Assessed at baseline and at the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in General Health MCS at Baseline and at the Last Study Visit 30 Days Post the Second Randomization (44 Days) | The Short Form (SF-12) health survey to assess health related quality of life, this validated instrument domains include general health questions and mental health related questions. Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate higher level of health. This change in outcome was between baseline and the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Assessed at baseline and at the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in General Health PCS at Baseline and at the Last Study Visit 30 Days Post the Second Randomization (44 Days) | The Short Form (SF-12) health survey to assess health related quality of life, this validated instrument domains include general health questions and physical health-related questions. Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate a higher level of health. This outcome was assessed at baseline and at the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days). | The outcome measure timeframe is at baseline and at the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days) for both control and intervention groups. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Assessed at baseline and at the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Disease Management Self-Efficacy (The General Disease Management Scale) at Baseline and 14 Days Post the First Randomization | Self-efficacy for disease management is associated with engagement in health behaviors and with improved medication adherence. The General Disease Management scale is a 5-item scale assessing confidence in disease self-management (scores 0-50, higher scores = greater confidence, lower scores = lower confidence). This change in outcome was between baseline and 14 days post the first randomization. | The outcome measure timeframe is at baseline and 14 days post-randomization. Intervention Group for Extended Use and Control Group for Extended Use are not applicable to this analysis | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Assessed at baseline and 14 days post the first randomization |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Symptom Management Self-Efficacy at Baseline and 14 Days Post Randomization | Self-efficacy for disease management is associated with engagement in health behaviors and with improved medication adherence. The Symptom Management scale is a 5-item scale assessing confidence in managing chronic disease symptoms (items tailored to the sample), with scores ranging from 0 to 100. A higher symptom management score indicates a higher confidence in managing symptoms. Conversely, a lower score indicates a lower confidence in managing symptoms. This change in outcome was between baseline and 14 days post randomization. | The outcome measure timeframe is at baseline and 14 days post-randomization. Intervention Group for Extended Use and Control Group for Extended Use are not applicable to this analysis | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Assessed at baseline and 14 days post randomization |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Patient Activation Score at Baseline and at the Last Study Visit 30 Days Post the Second Randomization (44 Days) | Patient activation refers to a patient's ability and willingness to manage their health. Activation will be measured using the 10-item Consumer Health Activation Index (CHAI). Scores range from 10 to 60. A higher score indicates that the patient has higher activation for self-management of their condition. Conversely, a lower score indicates lower activation for self-management of their condition. This change in outcome was between the baseline and the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Assessed at baseline and at the last study visit 30 days post the second randomization (44 days) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Medication Adherence at Baseline and 14 Days Post the First Randomization | Medication adherence will be measured using the 12-item Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS), a well-validated measure of patient-reported adherence. The minimum to maximum ARMS score ranges from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate poorer adherence, and lower scores indicate better medication adherence. This change in outcome was between baseline and 14 days post the first randomization. | Only the intervention group has analyzable data for this outcome. Control Group, Intervention Group for Extended Use, and Control Group for Extended Use are not applicable to this analysis. The number of participants analyzed was 76 because participants either withdrew, were lost to follow-up, or skipped these questions on the questionnaire. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Assessed at baseline and 14 days post the first randomization |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 90 |
| 1 |
| 90 |
| 1 |
| 90 |
| EG001 | Control Group | Only Cardea Solo device by Cardiac Insight for 14-day period. Cardea Solo by Cardiac Insight: Gold-standard cardiac monitor for comparison of testing devices. | 0 | 30 | 2 | 30 | 3 | 30 |
| EG002 | Intervention Group for Extended Use | 30-additional days of extended use of testing devices for adherence plus Kardia Mobile ECG device by AliveCor. Testing Devices: Pulsewatch system testing application on smartphone with smartwatch. Kardia Mobile by AliveCor: Mobile ECG device for comparison of testing devices during the extended use period. | 0 | 57 | 1 | 57 | 0 | 57 |
| EG003 | Control Group for Extended Use | No device usage for 30-days following completion of the original 14-day period. | 0 | 58 | 0 | 58 | 0 | 58 |
|
| COVID-19 | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment | The participant was admitted to the hospital on 3/27/2020 with weakness and a nonproductive cough. He was diagnosed with a COVID-19 infection. He was then discharged on 3/28/2020 with instructions to self-quarantine |
|
| Chest Pain and hospitalization | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | The patient was hospitalized for chest pain on 6/10/2021 |
|
| Pancreatitis | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment | The patient was hospitalized for pancreatitis |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |