Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion difficulties
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) significantly decreases mortality, morbidity and hospital length of stay without increasing the rate of re-hospitalization. It reduces psychologic stress caused by surgery and decreases postoperative complications about 50 %, especially in colorectal surgery. ERAS is now the object of several Good Practices Recommendations and is about to become the reference strategy.
The development of ambulatory surgery is a French national concern. Its interest has been demonstrated in many surgical fields. It requires a reflection centered on the patient and a health care pathway organization involving all health care actors.
While hospitalization is still the standard practice for colonic surgery, the objective of this study is to evaluate the medical and economic impact of an ambulatory care for colorectal surgery.
Ambulatory care will be compared to standard hospitalization of patients who benefit from the ERAS program.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) significantly decreases mortality, morbidity and hospital length of stay without increasing the rate of re-hospitalization. It reduces psychologic stress caused by surgery and decreases postoperative complications about 50 %, especially in colorectal surgery. ERAS is now the object of several Good Practices Recommendations and is about to become the reference strategy.
The development of ambulatory surgery is a French national concern. Its interest has been demonstrated in many surgical fields. It requires a reflection centered on the patient and a health care pathway organization involving all health care actors. Multiple interests have been shown:
Ambulatory colectomies feasibility is recognized since 2013-2014 in France (Dr. Gignoux, MD in Lyon and Dr. Chasserant, MD in Le Havre). These ambulatory procedures are implemented in few expert centers with significant experience (more than 100 patients in Le Havre and more than 85 patients in Lyon) but several human and organizational limitations slow this innovative care.
The risk of complications does not seem to be increased on condition of anticipate and provide a postoperative follow-up at home.
While hospitalization is still the standard practice for colonic surgery, the objective of this study is to evaluate the medical and economic impact of an ambulatory care for colorectal surgery.
Ambulatory care will be compared to standard hospitalization of patients who benefit from the ERAS program.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ambulatory care | Experimental | Colorectal surgery in ambulatory care |
|
| Standard hospitalization | Other | Colorectal surgery with standard hospitalization for retrospective patients who benefit from the ERAS program, selected by statistical matching. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical and economical evaluation | Other | Evaluation of the clinical and the economical impact of a colorectal surgery |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean cost evaluation | Mean cost evaluation, for the hospital, of the ambulatory care compared with standard hospitalization for patients who benefit from the ERAS program. | 1 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of life evaluation: EQ-5D (EuroQoL-5 Dimensions) scale | The EQ-5D Quality of Life scale consists of : (i) a descriptive system, consists in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. (ii) a visual analog scale, records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state" and "Worst imaginable health state". |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Didier Mutter, MD, PhD | Service Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Nouvel Hôpital Civil de Strasbourg | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne - Nouvel Hôpital Civil | Strasbourg | 67091 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25661787 | Background | Gignoux B, Pasquer A, Vulliez A, Lanz T. Outpatient colectomy within an enhanced recovery program. J Visc Surg. 2015 Feb;152(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Feb 7. | |
| 27671006 | Background | Chasserant P, Gosgnach M. Improvement of peri-operative patient management to enable outpatient colectomy. J Visc Surg. 2016 Nov;153(5):333-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 23. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 7 and 30 days |
| Mean hospital length of stay | Mean hospital length of stay for the "standard hospitalization" group | 2 years and 3 months |
| Ambulatory colectomies rate | Rate of ambulatory colectomies compared to the total number of colectomies performed | 2 years and 3 months |
| Ambulatory care failure rate | Rate of patients scheduled for ambulatory care and non-discharged the evening of surgery | 2 years and 3 months |
| Duty desk call | Number of patients who called the duty desk (or for whom the duty desk has been called) | 2 years and 3 months |
| Mean time period required for a postoperative complication care | Mean time period required for a postoperative complication care | 2 years and 3 months |
| Hospital re-admissions rate | Rate of hospital re-admissions related to postoperative complications | 30 days |
| Rate of complications (Morbidity) | Rate of complications related or not to surgery | 30 days |
| Rate of death (Mortality) | Number of patients who died within the individual participation period | 30 days |
| Complications rate | Clinical and economic evaluation of postoperative complications rates difference between "ambulatory care" group and "standard hospitalization" group | 30 days |
| Complications severity classification | Clinical and economic evaluation of complications severity assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification | 30 days |
| Evaluation of complication severity according to Clavien classification | Severity of the complications will be evaluated according to the Clavien classification from Grade I "Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiological interventions" to Grade V "Death of a patient" | 2 years and 3 months |
| Mean additional hospital length of stay | Clinical and economic evaluation of hospital length of stay related to complications difference between "ambulatory care" group and "standard hospitalization" group (additional hospitalizations, extension of hospitalization or new hospitalization). | 2 years and 3 months |
| Costs related to postoperative complications | Costs related to postoperative complications difference between "ambulatory care" group and "standard hospitalization" group | 2 years and 3 months |
| Costs related to the management of postoperative complications | Overall costs are evaluated by individual costs of:
| 2 years and 3 months |
| 25650365 | Background | Slim K; Groupe GRACE (Groupe francophone de rehabilitation amelioree apres chirurgie); Amalberti R. Ambulatory colectomy: no innovation without evaluation. J Visc Surg. 2015 Feb;152(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 31. No abstract available. |
| 16775831 | Background | Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Ubbink DT, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA; Laparoscopy and/or Fast Track Multimodal Management Versus Standard Care (LAFA) Study Group; Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg. 2006 Jul;93(7):800-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5384. |
| 19207699 | Background | Walter CJ, Collin J, Dumville JC, Drew PJ, Monson JR. Enhanced recovery in colorectal resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;11(4):344-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01789.x. Epub 2009 Feb 4. |
| 19415308 | Background | Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, Xynos E, Tekkis PP. Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Oct;24(10):1119-31. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0703-5. Epub 2009 May 5. |
| 20116145 | Background | Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2010 Aug;29(4):434-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Jan 29. |
| 21236454 | Background | Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP. Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery. 2011 Jun;149(6):830-40. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.003. Epub 2011 Jan 14. |
| 21328298 | Background | Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;2011(2):CD007635. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007635.pub2. |
| 27316295 | Background | Slim K, Delaunay L, Joris J, Leonard D, Raspado O, Chambrier C, Ostermann S; Le Groupe francophone de rehabilitation amelioree apres chirurgie (GRACE). How to implement an enhanced recovery program? Proposals from the Francophone Group for enhanced recovery after surgery (GRACE). J Visc Surg. 2016 Dec;153(6S):S45-S49. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 Jun 14. No abstract available. |
| 26913728 | Background | Gustafsson UO, Oppelstrup H, Thorell A, Nygren J, Ljungqvist O. Adherence to the ERAS protocol is Associated with 5-Year Survival After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. World J Surg. 2016 Jul;40(7):1741-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3460-y. |
| 23352608 | Background | Lawrence JK, Keller DS, Samia H, Ermlich B, Brady KM, Nobel T, Stein SL, Delaney CP. Discharge within 24 to 72 hours of colorectal surgery is associated with low readmission rates when using Enhanced Recovery Pathways. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Mar;216(3):390-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.014. Epub 2013 Jan 23. |
| 7891489 | Background | Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet. 1995 Mar 25;345(8952):763-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90643-6. |
| 19571699 | Background | Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett WJ, Rockall TA. 23-hour-stay laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jul;52(7):1239-43. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a0b32d. |
| 20734083 | Background | Gash KJ, Goede AC, Chambers W, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is feasible in complex colorectal resections and could enable day case colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):835-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1275-8. Epub 2010 Aug 24. |
| 23477191 | Background | Rogers JP, Dobradin A, Kar PM, Alam SE. Overnight hospital stay after colon surgery for adenocarcinoma. JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):333-6. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13427982376789. |
| 23925012 | Background | Dobradin A, Ganji M, Alam SE, Kar PM. Laparoscopic colon resections with discharge less than 24 hours. JSLS. 2013 Apr-Jun;17(2):198-203. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13654754535791. |
| 24395115 | Background | Martin-Ferrero MA, Faour-Martin O, Simon-Perez C, Perez-Herrero M, de Pedro-Moro JA. Ambulatory surgery in orthopedics: experience of over 10,000 patients. J Orthop Sci. 2014 Mar;19(2):332-338. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0501-3. Epub 2014 Jan 7. |
| 27863944 | Background | Verrier JF, Paget C, Perlier F, Demesmay F. How to introduce a program of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery? The experience of the CAPIO group. J Visc Surg. 2016 Dec;153(6S):S33-S39. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Nov 16. |
| 24600507 | Background | Daams F, Wu Z, Lahaye MJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A systematic review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Feb 27;6(2):14-26. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i2.14. |
| 15273542 | Background | Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. |