Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Combined study endpoints with ongoing registry (NOLA/NEU_2017_04)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prospective, single-arm, multicenter study that will generate clinical data using the NEUWAVE MicroWave Ablation System with AC (Ablation Confirmation) software in patients undergoing ablation of a soft tissue liver lesion.
Prospective, single-arm, multicenter study that will generate clinical data on 100 adult patients using the NEUWAVE MicroWave Ablation System with AC (Ablation Confirmation) software in patients undergoing ablation of a soft tissue liver lesion. AC software is a computed tomography (CT) image processing software package available as an optional feature for use with the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System. AC imports images from CT scanners for display and processing during ablation procedures to assist physicians in identifying ablation targets, assessing optimal ablation probe placement, and confirming the adequacy of the ablation margin.
All ablations will be performed percutaneously by an interventional radiologist while the patient is under general anesthesia or deep conscious sedation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microwave Ablation | Experimental | NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System with AC software for patients undergoing a percutaneous ablation of a soft tissue liver lesion by an interventional radiologist. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microwave Ablation | Device | NEUWAVE microwave ablation of soft tissue liver lesions will be performed percutaneously by an interventional radiologist while the patient is under general anesthesia or deep conscious sedation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Lesions Where Probe Repositioning is Suggested | Day 0 | |
| Percentage of Lesions Where Re-ablation is Suggested | Day 0 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Success | Ablation of the target lesion(s) according to the protocol and covered completely with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion plus an adequate ablative margin) | Day 0 |
| Technique Efficacy |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loma Linda University Medical Center | Loma Linda | California | 92354 | United States | ||
| UCLA |
39 participants met all inclusion/exclusion criteria. All participants were treated with the NEUWAVE microwave ablation device. However, 1 participant did not have the Ablation Confirmation software used in conjunction with the NEUWAVE microwave ablation device, as planned, and was therefore excluded in the full analysis set, defined as the 'Started' population.
46 participants signed the informed consent, 7 of whom were later screen failures as they did not meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria. These 7 participants were not treated with the NEUWAVE microwave ablation device.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Microwave Ablation With Ablation Confirmation Software | Each participant underwent NEUWAVE microwave ablation using Ablation Confirmation software of at least one soft-tissue liver lesion in accordance with the study site's standard-of-care. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Microwave Ablation With Ablation Confirmation Software | Each participant underwent NEUWAVE microwave ablation using Ablation Confirmation software of at least one soft-tissue liver lesion in accordance with the study site's standard-of-care. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Lesions Where Probe Repositioning is Suggested | Posted | Count of Units | Lesions | Day 0 | Lesions | Lesions |
|
|
6 weeks
Per the study protocol, only events that the site investigator determined to be device-related and/or procedure-related were captured within the study database as this was a post-market study. These events were evaluated from the time of first probe puncture (Day 0) through study completion (6 weeks).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Microwave Ablation With Ablation Confirmation Software | Each participant underwent NEUWAVE microwave ablation using Ablation Confirmation software of at least one soft-tissue liver lesion in accordance with the study site's standard-of-care. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erin Meyers | Ethicon | 937-681-0322 | eprifog1@its.jnj.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Jul 26, 2021 | Oct 12, 2023 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 28, 2022 | Oct 12, 2023 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008113 | Liver Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Ablation of the target lesion(s) according to the protocol and covered completely with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion plus an adequate ablative margin) as assessed by imaging at 6 weeks |
| 6 weeks |
| Hospital Resource Utilization | How many days patients remain in the hospital after the ablation procedure | 6 weeks |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| 90095 |
| United States |
| Olives View - UCLA Medical Center | Sylmar | California | 91342 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic | Rochester | Minnesota | 55902 | United States |
| MD Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| University of Wisconsin | Madison | Wisconsin | 53792 | United States |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| BMI | Mean | Standard Deviation | Kg/m^2 |
|
| Smoking Status | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Lesions |
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Lesions Where Re-ablation is Suggested | Posted | Count of Units | Lesions | Day 0 | Lesions | Lesions |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Technical Success | Ablation of the target lesion(s) according to the protocol and covered completely with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion plus an adequate ablative margin) | Posted | Count of Units | Lesions | Day 0 | Lesions | Lesions |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Technique Efficacy | Ablation of the target lesion(s) according to the protocol and covered completely with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (that is, the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion plus an adequate ablative margin) as assessed by imaging at 6 weeks | Posted | Count of Units | Lesions | 6 weeks | Lesions | Lesions |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Hospital Resource Utilization | How many days patients remain in the hospital after the ablation procedure | Only 27 patients had this data available. When not collected, this was noted as a protocol deviation. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 weeks |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 38 |
| 4 |
| 38 |
| 4 |
| 38 |
| Perihepatic fluid collection | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| D008107 |
| Liver Diseases |