| Primary | Number of Participants Categorized According to Performance Status (PS) Based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS | ECOG PS was used to assess physical health of participants. ECOG PS grade:0= fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction,1= restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature 2= ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities. Up and about more than 50% of waking hours, 3= capable of only limited self-care, 4= completely disabled, cannot carry on any selfcare, totally confined to bed or chair confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours and 5= dead. Only those categories with non-zero values were reported. | Ixazomib Safety Population (ISP) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ixazomib. As prespecified in the SAP, the ISP contained only one arm i.e., Ixazomib (participants originally randomized to ixazomib + participants who were randomized to the placebo arm prior to implementation of Amendment 08 and who crossed over to ixazomib arm contributing data for this outcome measure from the time they initiated ixazomib onward), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | Month 25 | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| | | Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
| ECOG Score 0 | | | | ECOG Score 1 | | |
| |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Receiving Ixazomib With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | Adverse events (AEs) were defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug. A TEAE was defined as an AE that started or worsened after first study drug administration and within 30 days of last dose of study drug. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest whole number. | ISP included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ixazomib. As prespecified in the SAP, the ISP contained only one arm i.e., Ixazomib (participants originally randomized to ixazomib + participants who were randomized to the placebo arm prior to implementation of Amendment 08 and who crossed over to ixazomib arm contributing data for this outcome measure from the time they initiated ixazomib onward), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Number | | percentage of participants | | Up to 58.4 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| |
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Receiving Ixazomib With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs were defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug. A TEAE was defined as an AE that started or worsened after first study drug administration and within 30 days of last dose of study drug. An SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, was a congenital abnormality or birth defect, or is an important medical event. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest whole number. | ISP included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ixazomib. As prespecified in the SAP, the ISP contained only one arm i.e., Ixazomib (participants originally randomized to ixazomib + participants who were randomized to the placebo arm prior to implementation of Amendment 08 and who crossed over to ixazomib arm contributing data for this outcome measure from the time they initiated ixazomib onward), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Number | | percentage of participants | | Up to 58.4 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
|
| Primary | Number of Participants Receiving Ixazomib With Clinically Significant Changes in Safety Laboratory Values | Clinical laboratory assessments included hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis. Any clinically significant changes in the clinical laboratory value over time based on the investigator's interpretation were reported. | ISP included all participants who received at least 1 dose of ixazomib. As prespecified in the SAP, the ISP contained only one arm i.e., Ixazomib (participants originally randomized to ixazomib + participants who were randomized to the placebo arm prior to implementation of Amendment 08 and who crossed over to ixazomib arm contributing data for this outcome measure from the time they initiated ixazomib onward), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Count of Participants | | Participants | | Up to 58.4 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| |
| Secondary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to the first occurrence of PD as evaluated by the investigator or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as ≥25% increase from lowest value in serum M component or urine M-component; difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase >10 milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL]); bone marrow plasma cell percent ≥10%; new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas development or definite increase in existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas size; hypercalcaemia development. | Efficacy Population included all participants who received ixazomib treatment for the duration of their study participation. As prespecified in the SAP, the Efficacy Population contained only one arm i.e., Ixazomib (efficacy outcomes data for the participants who received placebo before Protocol Amendment 8 was not collected per statistical analysis plan), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | From the first dose of study drug to every 4 weeks until PD or death from any cause (up to 58.4 months) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| |
| Secondary | Overall Survival (OS) | OS was measured as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of death. | Efficacy Population included all participants who received ixazomib treatment for the duration of their study participation. As prespecified in the SAP, the Efficacy Population contained only one arm i.e., Ixazomib (efficacy outcomes data for the participants who received placebo before Protocol Amendment 8 was not collected per statistical analysis plan), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | From the first dose of study drug to every 12 weeks during follow-up after PD or next line therapy or death whichever occurred later (up to 58.4 months) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Who Achieved or Maintained Best Response Before PD or up to Subsequent Therapy | Response was assessed according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. Best response includes partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), and complete response (CR). PR as per IMWG criteria is 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to less than (<)200 mg per 24 hours. VGPR is serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours. CR is negative immunofixation of serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. Percentages are rounded off to the nearest whole number. | Response-evaluable Population included a subset of the Efficacy Population and consisted of all participants who had a baseline&at least 1 postbaseline response assessment. As prespecified in the SAP, this population contained only one arm i.e., Ixazomib (efficacy outcomes data for the participants who received placebo before Protocol Amendment 8 was not collected per SAP), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Number | | percentage of participants | | Up to 58.4 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
|
| Secondary | Duration of Complete Response (CR) | Duration of CR was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug or the date of CR to the date of first documentation of PD. CR was defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine; soft tissue plasmacytomas disappearance; <5% plasma cells (PCs) in bone marrow. | Response-evaluable Population included a subset of the Efficacy Population and consisted of all participants who had a baseline&at least 1 postbaseline response assessment. As prespecified in the SAP, this population contained only one arm i.e., Ixazomib (efficacy outcomes data for the participants who received placebo before Protocol Amendment 8 was not collected per SAP), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | Up to 58.4 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| |
| Secondary | Time to Progression (TTP) | TTP was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of first documentation of PD. PD was defined as ≥25% increase from lowest value in serum M component or urine M-component; difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase >10 mg/dL); bone marrow plasma cell percent ≥10%; new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas development or definite increase in existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas size; hypercalcaemia development. | Efficacy Population included all participants who received ixazomib treatment for the duration of their study participation. As prespecified in the SAP, the Efficacy Population contained only one arm i.e., Ixazomib (efficacy outcomes data for the participants who received placebo before Protocol Amendment 8 was not collected per SAP), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | Up to 58.4 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| |
| Secondary | Time to Next-Line Therapy (TTNT) | TTNT was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of the first dose of next-line of antineoplastic therapy. | Efficacy Population included all participants who received ixazomib treatment for the duration of their study participation. As prespecified in the SAP, the Efficacy Population contained only one arm i.e., Ixazomib (efficacy outcomes data for the participants who received placebo before Protocol Amendment 8 was not collected per SAP), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | Up to 58.4 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| |
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With A New Primary Malignancy | | ISP=all participants who received atleast 1 dose of ixazomib. As prespecified in SAP,ISP had only 1 arm:Ixazomib (participants originally randomized to ixazomib + participants randomized to placebo arm prior to implementation of Amendment 08 & crossed over to ixazomib arm contributing data for this OM from time they initiated ixazomib onward), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Number | | percentage of participants | | Up to 58.4 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| |
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 as Measured by the Global Health Status (GHS) | The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. The change from baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C30) score is presented. Participant responses to the question "How would you rate your overall health during the past week?" are scored on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall GHS. | Efficacy Population included all participants who received ixazomib treatment for the duration of their study participation. Overall number of participants analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analyses. As prespecified in the SAP, the Efficacy Population contained only one arm i.e., Ixazomib (efficacy outcomes data for the participants who received placebo before Protocol Amendment 8 was not collected per SAP), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | | Baseline, Cycle 26 (cycle length=28 days) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
|
| Secondary | Correlation Between Frailty Status and PFS | Participant's frailty status is classified as fit, unfit, or frail on the basis of 4 components: age, the Charlson comorbidity scoring system without age weighting, the Katz index of independence in activities of daily living, and the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale. The sum of the 4 frailty scores equals the total frailty score. A total frailty score of 0 corresponds to a frailty status of fit; a total score of 1, to unfit; and a total score of 2 or more, to frail. PFS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to the first occurrence of PD as evaluated by the investigator. | Efficacy Population included all participants who received ixazomib treatment for the duration of their study participation. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis for the specified category. As prespecified in the SAP, the Efficacy Population contained only one arm i.e., Ixazomib (efficacy outcomes data for the participants who received placebo before Protocol Amendment 8 was not collected per SAP), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | Up to 58.4 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| |
| Secondary | Correlation Between Frailty Status and OS | Participant's frailty status is classified as fit, unfit, or frail on the basis of 4 components: age, the Charlson comorbidity scoring system without age weighting, the Katz index of independence in activities of daily living, and the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale. The sum of the 4 frailty scores equals the total frailty score. A total frailty score of 0 corresponds to a frailty status of fit; a total score of 1, to unfit; and a total score of 2 or more, to frail. OS was measured as the time from the date of first dose of study drug to the date of death. | Efficacy Population included all participants who received ixazomib treatment for the duration of their study participation. Number analyzed is the number of participants with data available for analysis for the specified category. As prespecified in the SAP, the Efficacy Population contained only one arm i.e., Ixazomib (efficacy outcomes data for the participants who received placebo before Protocol Amendment 8 was not collected per SAP), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | | Up to 58.4 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| |
| Secondary | Plasma Concentration of Ixazomib | Plasma concentrations of the complete hydrolysis product of ixazomib citrate (ixazomib) were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) assay. | ISP=all participants who received atleast 1 dose of ixazomib. Number analyzed=participants with data available for analysis at specified time point. As prespecified in SAP, ISP had only 1 arm:Ixazomib (participants originally randomized to ixazomib + participants randomized to placebo arm prior to implementation of Amendment 08 & crossed over to ixazomib arm contributing data for this OM from time they initiated ixazomib onward), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) | | Cycle 1 (1 and 4 hours post-dose Day 1, Days 8 and 15 pre-dose); Cycle 2 and 5 (Days 1 and 8 pre-dose) and Cycles 3, 4, 6 to 10 (Day 1 pre-dose) (cycle length=28 days) | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| |
| Secondary | Time to Resolution of Peripheral Neuropathy (PN) Events | PN is defined as the event in the high-level term of peripheral neuropathies not elsewhere classified (NEC) according to the medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). A PN event was considered as resolved if its final outcome was resolved with no subsequent PN event of the same preferred term occurring on the resolution date or the day before and after. Time to resolution was defined as the time from the initial onset date (inclusive) to the resolution date for resolved events. | ISP=all participants who received atleast 1 dose of ixazomib. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants with PN events. As prespecified in SAP,ISP had only 1 arm:Ixazomib (participants originally randomized to ixazomib+participants randomized to placebo prior to Amendment 08 &crossed over to ixazomib arm contributing data for this OM from time they initiated ixazomib onward),& is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | days | | Up to 58.4 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| |
| Secondary | Time to Improvement of PN Events | PN is defined as the event in the high-level term of peripheral neuropathies NEC according to the MedDRA. A PN event is considered to be improved if the event improves from the maximum grade; that is, all the grades recorded after the maximum grade are less than the maximum grade. Time to improvement is defined as the time from the initial onset date (inclusive) of the maximum grade to the first onset date that the toxicity grade is below the maximum grade with no higher grade thereafter, or the resolution date, whichever occurs first. | ISP=all participants who received atleast 1 dose of ixazomib. Overall number of participants analyzed=participants with PN events. As prespecified in SAP,ISP had only 1 arm:Ixazomib (participants originally randomized to ixazomib + participants randomized to placebo arm prior to implementation of Amendment 08 & crossed over to ixazomib arm contributing data for this OM from time they initiated ixazomib onward), thus data is presented accordingly. | Posted | | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | days | | Up to 58.4 months | | | | ID | Title | Description |
|---|
| OG000 | Ixazomib | Participants received ixazomib 3 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 1 through 4, during which if the participants tolerated the initial dose, the dose was escalated to ixazomib 4 mg, capsules, orally, once on Days 1, 8, and 15 for Cycles 5 through 26, or until documented progressive disease (PD) or intolerable toxicity, whichever occurred first (cycle length=28 days). |
| |