Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19-DA-N019 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background:
People with addictions often find it hard to choose the long-term benefits of abstinence over the short-term effects of using drugs. Researchers think this is partly due to parts of the brain involved in certain types of learning and decision-making. Researchers want to test these basic functions using a simple task with pictures and odors.
Objective:
To see if performance in a learning task differs between people who have opioid-use disorder and people who don t.
Eligibility:
Adults 21-60 years old who are willing to fast for at least 6 hours and smell food odors. Those with an opioid-use disorder must either not use for at least 3 weeks or be in treatment.
Design:
Participants will have 1 visit that will take up to 5 hours.
Before the visit, participants will be asked to not eat or drink anything except water for at least 6 hours.
At the visit, participants will be checked for signs of intoxication.
Participants will give urine and breath samples.
Participants will have tests of learning and behavior. They will look at shapes on a computer screen. The shapes will be paired with different food odors.
The odors will come from a sterile tube placed under the nose.
Participants will have their breathing monitored with a belt around the upper abdomen.
About 30 days and 60 days later, participants will be called and asked about their drug use over the past 30 days.
Background. People with substance-use disorders may have difficulty guiding their behavior on the basis of not-yet-experienced outcomes such as long-term effects of substance use. Use of mental inferences about future outcomes can be tested in a relatively simple laboratory task called sensory preconditioning.
Objective. To test whether sensory-preconditioning performance is worse in people with opioid use disorder (OUD) than in healthy, demographically matched controls. To increase generalizability, we will examine OUD participants who are in agonist treatment (abstinent or not) and OUD participants who are abstinent but not in treatment. We do not have a hypothesis about differences between those two groups, but we hypothesize that among agonist-treated OUD participants, performance will correlate with degree of abstinence.
Participant population. We will enroll 3 groups of men and women: (1) history of OUD, but abstinent for at least 3 weeks and not in agonist treatment, (2) OUD being treated with an agonist (buprenorphine or methadone), (3) no history of a substance-use disorder (except nicotine, for matching purposes) and not using any drug for nonmedical purposes.
Experimental design. Between-groups cross-sectional single-session laboratory study, with telephone follow-up at 30 and 60 days.
Methods. Each participant will participate in a sensory preconditioning task conducted in a single session. The task uses food odors delivered via nasal cannula and paired with visual cues on a computer screen. There are three phases: (1) Preconditioning, in which 2 pairs of visual cues (A+B, C+D) are shown on the computer screen; participants should acquire automatic associations between A+B and between C+D. (2) Conditioning, in which participants learn associations between the second cue of each pair (B and D) and either a sweet odor (B1), a savory odor (B2), or no odor (D); and (3) Probe Test, in which participants predict whether a visual cue will be paired with the sweet odor, the savory odor, or no odor, by pressing a left, middle, or right button. No odors are actually delivered in the probe test. The test of inference-guided behavior is the ability to associate visual cues A and C with an odor despite their never having been directly paired with an odor. In telephone follow-up at 30 and 60 days, participants will be asked to report drug use and associated problems since the session or follow-up call.
Primary outcome measures. (1) Value-based outcome inference as measured using responding to cues A minus C in the probe test. It is defined as the percentage of trials in which behavioral responses indicate a prediction of any odorant (sweet or savory), independent of whether this prediction is correct. Responding to cues B minus D will be used as a covariate to control for differences in olfactory acuity and non-inference-based task performance.
Secondary outcome measures. (1) The percentage of trials in which the odor prediction is correct. (2) Response latency per cue type. (3) Amplitude and (4) latency of respiratory (sniff) responses per cue type. (5) Acquisition (% responding to B minus D in the last run of conditioning) during the training portion of the inferencing task. (6) Drug use and associated problems at follow-up.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstinent OUD | Men and women with history of OUD, but abstinent for at least 3 weeks and not in agonist treatment | ||
| Controls | Men and women with no history of a substance-use disorder (except nicotine, for matching purposes) and not using any drug for nonmedical purposes | ||
| In-treatment OUD | Men and women with opioid use disorder (OUD) being treated with an agonist (buprenorphine or methadone) |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome inferencing in the probe test | Percentage of trials with cues A and C in which the participant predicts any odor (sweet or savory), regardless of whether the prediction is correct. | During task |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of trials in which the odor prediction is correct. | Task-performance measure of secondary interest | During task |
| Response latency per cue type | Task-performance measure of secondary interest |
Not provided
The enrollment target for the protocol is 120 (40 healthy controls, 40 patients on agonist maintenance, and 40 participants who have met DSM 5 criteria for OUD, but are now abstinent (for at least 3 weeks) and not on agonist maintenance.
All Participants
Additional Criteria for Abstinent OUD group
Additional Criteria for In-treatment OUD group
-Current enrollment in treatment for OUD with buprenorphine or methadone (>3 weeks on stable dose). Current use of illicit substances during treatment is permissible but not required. Rationale: Again, heterogeneity will be considerable, but what all enrollees will have in common is having sought treatment for their OUD and being currently maintained on an agonist that permits adaptive everyday functioning. Their heterogeneity in ongoing use of illicit substances will enable us to examine relationships between inferencing performance and treatment response.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
All participants
Additional criteria for Control Group
Additional criteria for Abstinent Group
Additional criteria for In-treatment OUD group
-Urine negative for opioid agonist that the participant is taking as part of their OUD treatment. Rationale: In-treatment OUD group should be in treatment. A negative test suggests the participant is not adhering to their treatment plan. In-treatment OUD participants may test positive for other substances as well as their opioid agonist because they may have ongoing illicit drug use.
Not provided
Not provided
Community sample
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIDA IRP Screening Team | Contact | (800) 535-8254 | researchstudies@nida.nih.gov | |
| Thorsten Kahnt, Ph.D. | Contact | (667) 312-5175 | thorsten.kahnt@nih.gov |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Thorsten Kahnt, Ph.D. | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Institute on Drug Abuse | Recruiting | Baltimore | Maryland | 21224 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27510424 | Background | Schoenbaum G, Chang CY, Lucantonio F, Takahashi YK. Thinking Outside the Box: Orbitofrontal Cortex, Imagination, and How We Can Treat Addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Dec;41(13):2966-2976. doi: 10.1038/npp.2016.147. Epub 2016 Aug 11. | |
| 23162000 | Background | Jones JL, Esber GR, McDannald MA, Gruber AJ, Hernandez A, Mirenzi A, Schoenbaum G. Orbitofrontal cortex supports behavior and learning using inferred but not cached values. Science. 2012 Nov 16;338(6109):953-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1227489. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009293 | Opioid-Related Disorders |
| D019966 | Substance-Related Disorders |
| D016739 | Behavior, Addictive |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000079524 | Narcotic-Related Disorders |
| D064419 | Chemically-Induced Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D003192 | Compulsive Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| During task |
| Amplitude of respiratory (sniff) responses per cue type | Task-performance measure of secondary interest | During task |
| Latency of respiratory (sniff) responses per cue type | Task-performance measure of secondary interest | During task |
| Drug use at follow-up | Clinical-outcome measure | 30 and 60 days |
| 18920626 | Background | BROGDEN WJ. Sensory pre-conditioning of human subjects. J Exp Psychol. 1947 Dec;37(6):527-39. doi: 10.1037/h0058465. No abstract available. |
| D007175 | Impulsive Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |