Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Overall Goal: To determine the effectiveness of Kids SIPsmartER in improving sugar-sweetened beverages behaviors among 7th grade students. Secondary aims are to determine (1) changes in secondary student outcomes (e.g. quality of life, BMI z-score, theory-related variables, health and media literacy), (2) changes in caregiver SSB behaviors and home environment, (3) maintenance of outcomes at 19-months post-baseline, (4) assess the reach and representativeness of Kids SIPsmartER, among students and caregivers, and (5) implementation, adoption, and maintenance among teachers and schools.
The intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB, e.g., soda/pop, sweet tea, sports and energy drinks, fruit drinks) is disproportionately high in Appalachia, including among adolescents whose intake is more than double the national average and more than four times the recommended daily amount. There are strong and consistent scientific data and systematic reviews documenting relationships among high SSB consumption and numerous chronic health conditions such obesity, some types of obesity-related cancers, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and dental erosion and decay. Reaching adolescents with behaviorally-focused health programs where they spend the majority of their time, at school, shows promise. However, engaging caregivers who serve as their child's most influential role model as well as the gatekeeper for the home environment may be equally as important in changing adolescents' SSB behaviors. Finally, there is a great need to understand how to support schools and teachers to deliver and maintain evidence-based health education programs, especially among rural schools. Thus, the overarching goal of this proposal is to work in partnership with Appalachian middle schools to implement and evaluate Kids SIPsmartER. Kids SIPsmartER is a 6-month, school-based, behavior and health literacy curriculum aimed at improving SSB behaviors among middle school students. The program also integrates a two-way short service message (SMS) strategy to engage caregivers in SSB role modeling and supporting home SSB environment changes. Kids SIPsmartER is grounded by the Theory of Planned Behavior as well as health literacy, media literacy, numeracy, and public health literacy concepts. In the proposed cluster-randomized controlled trial, the investigators target 12 middle schools in medically underserved Appalachian counties in southwest Virginia. This study is guided by the RE-AIM (reach, adoption, effectiveness, implementation, and maintenance) framework and is a type 1 hybrid design. The primary aim is to assess changes in SSB behaviors at 7-months among 7th grade students at schools receiving Kids SIPsmartER, as compared to control schools. The investigators will also evaluate changes in secondary student outcomes (e.g., BMI, quality of life, theory-related variables), changes in caregiver outcomes (e.g., SSB behaviors, home SSB environment), and 19-month maintenance of outcomes. The reach and representativeness of Kids SIPsmartER will be assessed. Furthermore, the investigators will use a mixed-methods approach with interviews, surveys, observation, and process evaluation strategies to determine the degree to which teachers implement Kids SIPsmartER as intended and the potential for institutionalization within the schools. The long-term goal of this health promotion and prevention line of research is to establish an effective, scalable, and sustainable multi-level strategy to improve SSB behaviors and reduce SSB-related health inequities and chronic conditions (e.g. obesity, cancer, type II diabetes, heart disease, dental caries) in rural Appalachia.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kids SipSmartER | Experimental | Kids SIPsmartER is a 12 session, 6-month program with an integrated two-way short service message (SMS) strategy to engage caregivers in SSB role modeling and supporting home SSB environment changes |
|
| Control | No Intervention | Control arm receives no intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kids SipSmartER | Behavioral | Kids SIPsmartER is grounded by the Theory of Planned Behavior as well as health literacy, media literacy, numeracy, and public health literacy concepts |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Student: SSB Change From Baseline to 7-months (All Participants) | Change in ounces of sugar sweetened beverage consumption from Baseline to 7-months as measured via the validated Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEVQ-15). Participants were asked to report how often and how much of the following sugary drinks they consumed in the past 30 days: regular soft drinks, sweetened juice beverage/drink, sweetened tea, coffee with sugar, energy/sports drinks. Using standardized and validated scoring procedures, daily totals for each of the sugary beverages were determined by multiplying intake frequency by portion size. These daily total intakes were then summed across the five sugary drink types to obtain a total daily intake, in fluid ounces, of all sugary drinks. Change scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline sugary drink intake from the 7 month follow-up. | Baseline and 7-months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Caregiver: SSB Change From Baseline to 7-months (All Participants) | Change in ounces of sugar sweetened beverage consumption from Baseline to 7-months as measured via the validated Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEVQ-15). Participants were asked to report how often and how much of the following sugary drinks they consumed in the past 30 days: regular soft drinks, sweetened juice beverage/drink, sweetened tea, coffee with sugar, energy/sports drinks. Using standardized and validated scoring procedures, daily totals for each of the sugary beverages were determined by multiplying intake frequency by portion size. These daily total intakes were then summed across the five sugary drink types to obtain a total daily intake, in fluid ounces, of all sugary drinks. Change scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline sugary drink intake from the 7 month follow-up. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22908-0717 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41496860 | Derived | Kirkpatrick BM, Brock DP, Reid AL, Porter KJ, Markwalter TH, You W, Chow PI, Ritterband L, Zoellner J. An SMS intervention to reduce caregiver's sugar-sweetened beverages: impacts on theoretical constructs and parenting practices from a randomized controlled trial in rural appalachia. J Nutr Sci. 2025 Dec 19;14:e91. doi: 10.1017/jns.2025.10057. eCollection 2025. | |
| 40611074 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Kids SipSmartER | Kids SIPsmartER is a 12 session, 6-month program with an integrated two-way short service message (SMS) strategy to engage caregivers in sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) role modeling and supporting home SSB environment changes Kids SipSmartER: Kids SIPsmartER is grounded by the Theory of Planned Behavior as well as health literacy, media literacy, numeracy, and public health literacy concepts |
| FG001 | Control | Control arm receives no intervention |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Analysis population are enrolled students and caregivers who completed the baseline and 7 month assessments
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Kids SipSmartER | Kids SIPsmartER is a 12 session, 6-month program with an integrated two-way short service message (SMS) strategy to engage caregivers in SSB role modeling and supporting home SSB environment changes Kids SipSmartER: Kids SIPsmartER is grounded by the Theory of Planned Behavior as well as health literacy, media literacy, numeracy, and public health literacy concepts |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Total number includes Student and Caregiver participants numbers combined |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Student: SSB Change From Baseline to 7-months (All Participants) | Change in ounces of sugar sweetened beverage consumption from Baseline to 7-months as measured via the validated Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEVQ-15). Participants were asked to report how often and how much of the following sugary drinks they consumed in the past 30 days: regular soft drinks, sweetened juice beverage/drink, sweetened tea, coffee with sugar, energy/sports drinks. Using standardized and validated scoring procedures, daily totals for each of the sugary beverages were determined by multiplying intake frequency by portion size. These daily total intakes were then summed across the five sugary drink types to obtain a total daily intake, in fluid ounces, of all sugary drinks. Change scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline sugary drink intake from the 7 month follow-up. | This analysis only includes student participants. While caregivers were analyzed for change in SSB, caregiver SSB change was a secondary outcome and therefore they are not reported here. Overall participants analyzed includes students who completed both the baseline and 7 month follow up items for the BEVQ-15. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | fluid ounces | Baseline and 7-months |
Adverse events were collected through the 19-month follow-up data collection
Given the low risk nature of the sugary beverage intervention, adverse event and/or serious adverse event were determined in non-systematic method, including self-reporting by participants.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Kids SipSmartER | Kids SIPsmartER is a 12 session, 6-month program with an integrated two-way short service message (SMS) strategy to engage caregivers in SSB role modeling and supporting home SSB environment changes Kids SipSmartER: Kids SIPsmartER is grounded by the Theory of Planned Behavior as well as health literacy, media literacy, numeracy, and public health literacy concepts |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Jamie Zoellner | Univeristy of Virginia | 434-962-4488 | jz9q@virginia.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Sep 4, 2024 | Dec 17, 2024 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 7, 2019 | Dec 17, 2024 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
Cluster randomized design of schools
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline and 7-months |
| Student: BMI Z-score Change From Baseline to 7-months | Student BMI z-score: BMI z-score was calculated using the World Health Organization (WHO) growth reference standards. The z-score represents the number of standard deviations a child's BMI is from the population mean for age and sex. A z-score of 0 corresponds to the median BMI of the reference population. Positive values indicate a BMI higher than the reference median, while negative values indicate a BMI lower than the reference median. Higher z-scores generally indicate increased adiposity, with standard clinical thresholds defining overweight as a BMI z-score ≥ 1 and obesity as a BMI z-score ≥ 2. | Baseline and 7-months |
| Caregiver: BMI Change From Baseline to 7-Months | Caregiver BMI was calculated from height and weight data using the following equation: kg/m^2 | Baseline and 7-months |
| Student and Caregiver: Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 7-months--Overall Health Rating | Overall health rating is a Single item question asking to rate general overall health and scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1=poor to 5=excellent. | Baseline and 7-months |
| Caregiver: Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 7-months--Unhealthy Days | Using validated scoring procedures, an unhealthy days score was computed by adding the number of physically and mentally unhealthy days within the past 30 days, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 30 days. Higher scores indicate worse quality of life. | Baseline and 7-months |
| Student: Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 7-months--school Related Function | School-related quality of life (QOL) was assessed with the 5-item school functioning subscale of the Pediatric QOL Inventory which used a 5-point Likert scale (i.e., 1 = never a problem, 5 = almost always a problem). Applying validated scoring procedures, items were reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating higher school-related QOL. | Baseline and 7-months |
| Porter KJ, Reid AL, Markwalter T, Kirkpatrick BM, Walters HG, Helms CE, Salyers L, Zoellner JM. Using implementation strategies to promote the maintenance of Kids SIPsmartER in rural Appalachian middle schools: a process evaluation. BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):2324. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23554-x. |
| 39236080 | Derived | Zoellner JM, Porter KJ, Reid A, Markwalter T, Kirkpatrick B, Brock DP, You W. Comparison of Researcher-Led versus Teacher-Led effectiveness and fidelity: A Hybrid Type 1 study of Kids SIPsmartER in Appalachia middle schools. Transl Behav Med. 2024 Oct 6;14(10):578-587. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae041. |
| 38664715 | Derived | Zoellner JM, You W, Porter K, Kirkpatrick B, Reid A, Brock D, Chow P, Ritterband L. Kids SIPsmartER reduces sugar-sweetened beverages among Appalachian middle-school students and their caregivers: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Apr 25;21(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01594-7. |
| 36949896 | Derived | Yuhas M, Brock DP, Ritterband LM, Chow PI, Porter KJ, Zoellner JM. Retention and engagement of rural caregivers of adolescents in a short message service intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage intake. Digit Health. 2023 Mar 16;9:20552076231160324. doi: 10.1177/20552076231160324. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec. |
| 31233859 | Derived | Zoellner JM, Porter KJ, You W, Chow PI, Ritterband LM, Yuhas M, Loyd A, McCormick BA, Brock DP. Kids SIPsmartER, a cluster randomized controlled trial and multi-level intervention to improve sugar-sweetened beverages behaviors among Appalachian middle-school students: Rationale, design & methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Aug;83:64-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.011. Epub 2019 Jun 21. |
| BG001 | Control | Control arm receives no intervention |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Schools |
|
| Mean |
| Standard Deviation |
| years |
| Participants |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Total number includes Student and Caregiver participants numbers combined | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Total number of participants includes the combination of student and caregiver participants within each arm of the study. | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Total number includes Student and Caregiver participants numbers combined | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants | Participants |
|
|
| BMI status | BMI percentile for children is a standardized measure used to assess body weight relative to height, adjusted for age and sex. It is calculated by deriving the Body Mass Index (BMI) from weight (kg) divided by height squared (m²) and then comparing the value to age- and sex-specific growth charts established by the Center for Disease Control. Caregiver BMI was calculated from height and weight data using the following equation: kg/m^2 | Total number includes Student and Caregiver participants numbers combined | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
| Student BMI z-score | BMI z-score was calculated using the World Health Organization (WHO) growth reference standards. The z-score represents the number of standard deviations a child's BMI is from the population mean for age and sex. A z-score of 0 corresponds to the median BMI of the reference population. Positive values indicate a BMI higher than the reference median, while negative values indicate a BMI lower than the reference median. Higher z-scores generally indicate increased adiposity, with standard clinical thresholds defining overweight as a BMI z-score ≥ 1 and obesity as a BMI z-score ≥ 2. | BMIz-scores are only calculated for the student sample. A total of 11 KSS student participants and 19 control student participants were not weighed and therefore are not in the sample. | Mean | Standard Deviation | z-score | Participants |
|
|
| Student BMI percentile | BMI percentile for children is a standardized measure used to assess body weight relative to height, adjusted for age and sex. It is calculated by deriving the Body Mass Index (BMI) from weight (kg) divided by height squared (m²) and then comparing the value to age- and sex-specific growth charts established by the CDC. | BMI percentiles are only calculated for the student sample. A total of 11 KSS student participants and 19 control student participants were not weighed and therefore are not in the sample. | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentile | Participants |
|
|
| Caregiver Educational Attainment | Only caregivers are asked for their educational attainment. | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
|
| Caregiver Household Income | Only caregivers are asked to report their family's annual household income | Count of Participants | Participants | Participants |
|
|
| Caregiver BMI | Only caregivers weight and height were calculated into a BMI. Additionally, a total of 10 KSS caregiver participants and 7 caregiver control participants did not report their weights and heights so BMI could not be calculated for them. | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m2 | Participants |
|
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Kids SipSmartER | Kids SIPsmartER is a 12 session, 6-month program with an integrated two-way short service message (SMS) strategy to engage caregivers in SSB role modeling and supporting home SSB environment changes Kids SipSmartER: Kids SIPsmartER is grounded by the Theory of Planned Behavior as well as health literacy, media literacy, numeracy, and public health literacy concepts |
| OG001 | Control | Control arm receives no intervention |
|
|
| Secondary | Caregiver: SSB Change From Baseline to 7-months (All Participants) | Change in ounces of sugar sweetened beverage consumption from Baseline to 7-months as measured via the validated Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEVQ-15). Participants were asked to report how often and how much of the following sugary drinks they consumed in the past 30 days: regular soft drinks, sweetened juice beverage/drink, sweetened tea, coffee with sugar, energy/sports drinks. Using standardized and validated scoring procedures, daily totals for each of the sugary beverages were determined by multiplying intake frequency by portion size. These daily total intakes were then summed across the five sugary drink types to obtain a total daily intake, in fluid ounces, of all sugary drinks. Change scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline sugary drink intake from the 7 month follow-up. | This analysis only includes caregiver participants. While students were analyzed for change in SSB, student SSB change was a primary outcome and therefore they are not reported here. Overall participants analyzed includes caregivers who completed both the baseline and 7 month follow up items for the BEVQ-15. | Posted | Mean | 80% Confidence Interval | fluid ounces | Baseline and 7-months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Student: BMI Z-score Change From Baseline to 7-months | Student BMI z-score: BMI z-score was calculated using the World Health Organization (WHO) growth reference standards. The z-score represents the number of standard deviations a child's BMI is from the population mean for age and sex. A z-score of 0 corresponds to the median BMI of the reference population. Positive values indicate a BMI higher than the reference median, while negative values indicate a BMI lower than the reference median. Higher z-scores generally indicate increased adiposity, with standard clinical thresholds defining overweight as a BMI z-score ≥ 1 and obesity as a BMI z-score ≥ 2. | Because BMI is calculated differently for adults, this analysis only includes student participants. Caregiver BMI changes are reported separately. Overall participants analyzed includes students who completed both the baseline and 7 month height and weight measures. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | z-score | Baseline and 7-months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Caregiver: BMI Change From Baseline to 7-Months | Caregiver BMI was calculated from height and weight data using the following equation: kg/m^2 | Because BMI is calculated differently for children, this analysis only includes caregiver participants. Student BMI changes are reported separately. Overall participants analyzed includes caregivers who reported their baseline and 7 month height and weight measures. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | kg/m^2 | Baseline and 7-months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Student and Caregiver: Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 7-months--Overall Health Rating | Overall health rating is a Single item question asking to rate general overall health and scored on a 5-point Likert scale from 1=poor to 5=excellent. | Overall participants analyzed includes students and caregivers who completed both the baseline and 7 month overall health rating item. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline and 7-months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Caregiver: Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 7-months--Unhealthy Days | Using validated scoring procedures, an unhealthy days score was computed by adding the number of physically and mentally unhealthy days within the past 30 days, with a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 30 days. Higher scores indicate worse quality of life. | Questions were only asked of caregiver and students are not included in the analysis. Overall participants analyzed includes caregivers who completed both the baseline and 7-month follow up items for the quality of life scale. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline and 7-months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Student: Quality of Life Change From Baseline to 7-months--school Related Function | School-related quality of life (QOL) was assessed with the 5-item school functioning subscale of the Pediatric QOL Inventory which used a 5-point Likert scale (i.e., 1 = never a problem, 5 = almost always a problem). Applying validated scoring procedures, items were reverse-scored and linearly transformed to a 0 to 100 scale with higher scores indicating higher school-related QOL. | This analysis only includes student participants. Caregiver quality of life measures are reported separately. Overall participants analyzed includes students who completed both the baseline and 7 month school related function items. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline and 7-months |
|
|
|
| Post-Hoc | Caregiver: SSB Change From Baseline to 7-months for Caregivers Consuming > 24 fl oz SSB at Baseline | Change in ounces of sugar sweetened beverage consumption from Baseline to 7-months as measured via the validated Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEVQ-15). Participants were asked to report how often and how much of the following sugary drinks they consumed in the past 30 days: regular soft drinks, sweetened juice beverage/drink, sweetened tea, coffee with sugar, energy/sports drinks. Using standardized and validated scoring procedures, daily totals for each of the sugary beverages were determined by multiplying intake frequency by portion size. These daily total intakes were then summed across the five sugary drink types to obtain a total daily intake, in fluid ounces, of all sugary drinks. Change scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline sugary drink intake from the 7 month follow-up. | This analysis only includes caregiver participants who consumed > 24 fluid ounces of SSB at Baseline AND who completed both the Baseline and 7 month SSB items for the BEVQ-15. While students were analyzed similarly, student SSB change across Baseline SSB intake was a primary outcome and therefore they are not reported here. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | fluid ounces | Baseline and 7-months |
|
|
|
| Post-Hoc | Caregiver: SSB Change From Baseline to 7-months for Caregivers Consuming > 12 fl oz SSB at Baseline | Change in ounces of sugar sweetened beverage consumption from Baseline to 7-months as measured via the validated Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEVQ-15). Participants were asked to report how often and how much of the following sugary drinks they consumed in the past 30 days: regular soft drinks, sweetened juice beverage/drink, sweetened tea, coffee with sugar, energy/sports drinks. Using standardized and validated scoring procedures, daily totals for each of the sugary beverages were determined by multiplying intake frequency by portion size. These daily total intakes were then summed across the five sugary drink types to obtain a total daily intake, in fluid ounces, of all sugary drinks. Change scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline sugary drink intake from the 7 month follow-up. | This analysis only includes caregiver participants who consumed > 12 fluid ounces of SSB at Baseline AND who completed both the Baseline and 7 month SSB items for the BEVQ-15. While students were analyzed similarly, student SSB change across Baseline SSB intake was a primary outcome and therefore they are not reported here. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | fluid ounces | Baseline and 7-months |
|
|
|
| Post-Hoc | Caregiver: SSB Change From Baseline to 7-months for Caregivers Consuming > 8 fl oz SSB at Baseline | Change in ounces of sugar sweetened beverage consumption from Baseline to 7-months as measured via the validated Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEVQ-15). Participants were asked to report how often and how much of the following sugary drinks they consumed in the past 30 days: regular soft drinks, sweetened juice beverage/drink, sweetened tea, coffee with sugar, energy/sports drinks. Using standardized and validated scoring procedures, daily totals for each of the sugary beverages were determined by multiplying intake frequency by portion size. These daily total intakes were then summed across the five sugary drink types to obtain a total daily intake, in fluid ounces, of all sugary drinks. Change scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline sugary drink intake from the 7 month follow-up. | This analysis only includes caregiver participants who consumed > 8 fluid ounces of SSB at Baseline AND who completed both the Baseline and 7 month SSB items for the BEVQ-15. While students were analyzed similarly, student SSB change across Baseline SSB intake was a primary outcome and therefore they are not reported here. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | fluid ounces | Baseline and 7-months |
|
|
|
| Post-Hoc | Student: SSB Change From Baseline to 7-months for Students Consuming > 24 fl oz SSB at Baseline | Change in ounces of sugar sweetened beverage consumption from Baseline to 7-months as measured via the validated Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEVQ-15). Participants were asked to report how often and how much of the following sugary drinks they consumed in the past 30 days: regular soft drinks, sweetened juice beverage/drink, sweetened tea, coffee with sugar, energy/sports drinks. Using standardized and validated scoring procedures, daily totals for each of the sugary beverages were determined by multiplying intake frequency by portion size. These daily total intakes were then summed across the five sugary drink types to obtain a total daily intake, in fluid ounces, of all sugary drinks. Change scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline sugary drink intake from the 7 month follow-up. | This analysis only includes student participants who consumed > 24 fluid ounces of SSB at Baseline AND who completed both the Baseline and 7 month SSB items for the BEVQ-15. While caregivers were analyzed similarly, caregiver SSB change across Baseline SSB intake was a secondary outcome and therefore they are not reported here. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | fluid ounces | Baseline and 7-months |
|
|
|
| Post-Hoc | Student: SSB Change From Baseline to 7-months for Students Consuming > 12 fl oz SSB at Baseline | Change in ounces of sugar sweetened beverage consumption from Baseline to 7-months as measured via the validated Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEVQ-15). Participants were asked to report how often and how much of the following sugary drinks they consumed in the past 30 days: regular soft drinks, sweetened juice beverage/drink, sweetened tea, coffee with sugar, energy/sports drinks. Using standardized and validated scoring procedures, daily totals for each of the sugary beverages were determined by multiplying intake frequency by portion size. These daily total intakes were then summed across the five sugary drink types to obtain a total daily intake, in fluid ounces, of all sugary drinks. Change scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline sugary drink intake from the 7 month follow-up. | This analysis only includes student participants who consumed > 12 fluid ounces of SSB at Baseline AND who completed both the Baseline and 7 month SSB items for the BEVQ-15. While caregivers were analyzed similarly, caregiver SSB change across Baseline SSB intake was a secondary outcome and therefore they are not reported here. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | fluid ounces | Baseline and 7-months |
|
|
|
| Post-Hoc | Student: SSB Change From Baseline to 7-months for Students Consuming > 8 fl oz SSB at Baseline | Change in ounces of sugar sweetened beverage consumption from Baseline to 7-months as measured via the validated Beverage Intake Questionnaire (BEVQ-15). Participants were asked to report how often and how much of the following sugary drinks they consumed in the past 30 days: regular soft drinks, sweetened juice beverage/drink, sweetened tea, coffee with sugar, energy/sports drinks. Using standardized and validated scoring procedures, daily totals for each of the sugary beverages were determined by multiplying intake frequency by portion size. These daily total intakes were then summed across the five sugary drink types to obtain a total daily intake, in fluid ounces, of all sugary drinks. Change scores were calculated by subtracting the baseline sugary drink intake from the 7 month follow-up. | This analysis only includes student participants who consumed > 8 fluid ounces of SSB at Baseline AND who completed both the Baseline and 7 month SSB items for the BEVQ-15. While caregivers were analyzed similarly, caregiver SSB change across Baseline SSB intake was a secondary outcome and therefore they are not reported here. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | fluid ounces | Baseline and 7-months |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 424 |
| 0 |
| 424 |
| 0 |
| 424 |
| EG001 | Control | Control arm receives no intervention | 0 | 322 | 0 | 322 | 0 | 322 |
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Other or unknown |
|
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
| Overweight (student BMI 85th-<95th%; caregiver BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2) |
|
| Obese (student BMI 95th -<99th%; caregiver BMI 30-34.9 kg/m2) |
|
| Severe Obesity (student BMI >/= 99th%; caregiver BMI >/= 30 kg/m2) |
|
| Other or unknown |
|
|
| 4-year college degree or higher |
|
| Other or unknown |
|
| $50,000-$74,999 |
|
| >/= $75,000 |
|
| Other or unknown |
|
| Caregivers: Overall Health Rating Change |
|
|