Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival of direct composite resin restorations in primary molars using different methods of isolation of the operative field: absolute isolation (local anesthesia, use of dental clamp and rubber dam) and relative isolation (cotton rollers and saliva ejector) by a randomized clinical trial. All composite restorations will be performed on children aged 4 to 10 years who present at least one dentin caries lesion or restoration needing replacement, without pulp involvement in a primary tooth. The treatments will be performed in the dental clinic of the University of São Paulo (FOUSP) by trained operators. The teeth will be randomized between the groups: Absolute Isolation (AI) and Relative Isolation (IR) and restored with composite resin (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive adhesive system and Filtek BulkFill composite resin - 3M ESPE) stratified by surface (single or multi surface). Restoration evaluation will be performed after 6, 12, 18, and 24 months by a blind, trained and calibrated examiner. As a primary outcome, the survival of the restorations will be evaluated. The secondary outcomes involve the procedure time (in minutes), professional and material cost (in Brazilian reais), as well as the cost-effectiveness of the restorations and the discomfort reported by the patient (measured using the Wong-Baker scale). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test will be applied to the survival of the restoration. All variables will be modeled and compared with a Cox regression model of shared fragility. The discomfort reported by the patient will be analyzed by Ordinal Logistic Regression (α = 5%).
Objective:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival of direct composite resin restorations in primary molars using different methods for isolation of the operative field: absolute isolation (local anesthesia, use of dental clamp and rubber dam) and relative isolation (cotton rollers and saliva ejector) by a randomized clinical trial.
Materials and Methods:
All composite restorations will be performed on children aged 4 to 10 years who present at least one dentin caries lesion or restoration needing replacement, without pulp involvement in a primary tooth. The treatments will be performed in the dental clinic of the University of São Paulo (FOUSP) by trained operators. The teeth will be randomized between the groups: Absolute Isolation (AI) and Relative Isolation (IR) and restored with composite resin (Scotchbond Universal Adhesive adhesive system and Filtek BulkFill composite resin - 3M ESPE) stratified by surface (single or multi surface).
Restoration evaluation will be performed after 6, 12, 18, and 24 months by a blind, trained and calibrated examiner.
As a primary outcome, the survival of the restorations will be evaluated. The secondary outcomes involve the procedure time (in minutes), professional and material cost (in Brazilian reais), as well as the cost-effectiveness of the restorations and the discomfort reported by the patient (measured using the Wong-Baker scale).
The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test will be applied to the survival of the restoration. All variables will be modeled and compared with a Cox regression model of shared fragility. The discomfort reported by the patient will be analyzed by Ordinal Logistic Regression (α = 5%).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber dam isolation | Active Comparator | Absolute isolation
|
|
| Relative isolation | Experimental | Relative isolation
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber dam isolation | Procedure | Local anesthesia, use of dental clamp and rubber dam, followed by restoration using universal adhesive system and bulkfill composite restoration |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Survival of the restorations | The restorations will be evaluated according to the Roeleveld et al., 2006 criteria. Roeleveld et al. codes success (0-10) or failure (11-50). | Every 6 months up to 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Child self-reported discomfort (0-5) | Wong-Baker Facial scale (Wong; Baker, 1998) from 0 to 5. The higher the score, higher the child self-reported discomfort. | Immediately after treatment (in the same appointment) |
| Time spent during treatment (in minutes) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Daniela P Raggio, PhD | University of Sao Paulo | Study Director |
| Isabel C Olegário, PhD | University of Sao Paulo | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Sao Paulo | São Paulo | São Paulo | 05508900 | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20628774 | Background | Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):349-66. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8. Epub 2010 Jul 14. | |
| 17518963 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Only the evaluator of the restorations will be blind to the type of treatment (absolute or relative isolation). As the procedures are different, it will not be possible to blind operators and patients.
| Relative isolation | Procedure | No local anesthesia, use of cotton rollers and saliva ejector, followed by restoration using universal adhesive system and bulkfill composite restoration |
|
The total time spent in each restorative session will be recorded in minutes. |
| Immediately after treatment (in the same appointment) |
| Procedure cost (in brazilian reais - R$) | Direct costs - all materials used in each procedure will be recorded. The average price of three different places in Brazilian market will be used (in Brazilian Reais). | Immediately after treatment (in the same appointment) |
| Incremental Cost (in brazilian reais) | For the calculation of the final cost (Brazilian reais) of the treatment of each tooth will be used the result of the sum of the initial cost of the restorative procedure with the cost of repairs when necessary (incremental cost). | Every 12 months up to 24 months |
| Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, Pitts NB. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;35(3):170-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347.x. |
| 29322626 | Background | Chisini LA, Collares K, Cademartori MG, de Oliveira LJC, Conde MCM, Demarco FF, Correa MB. Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;28(2):123-139. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12346. Epub 2018 Jan 10. |
| 17140533 | Result | Roeleveld AC, van Amerongen WE, Mandari GJ. Influence of residual caries and cervical gaps on the survival rate of Class II glass ionomer restorations. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006 Jun;7(2):85-91. doi: 10.1007/BF03320820. |