Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| I4V-MC-JAIY | Other Identifier | Eli Lilly and Company | |
| 2018-001726-26 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Incyte Corporation | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) in participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Milligram (mg) Baricitinib | Experimental | 4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily in combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS). Placebo administered orally once daily to match 2 mg Baricitinib. |
|
| 2 mg Baricitinib | Experimental | 2 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily in combination with TCS. Placebo administered orally once daily to match 4 mg Baricitinib. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Placebo administered orally once daily in combination with TCS. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baricitinib | Drug | Administered orally. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 With a ≥ 2 Point Improvement | The IGA measures investigators global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. | Week 16 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) | The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI75 is defined as a ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Are currently experiencing or have a history of other concomitant skin conditions (e.g., psoriasis or lupus erythematosus), or a history of erythrodermic, refractory, or unstable skin disease that requires frequent hospitalizations and/or intravenous treatment for skin infections.
A history of eczema herpeticum within 12 months, and/or a history of 2 or more episodes of eczema herpeticum in the past.
Participants who are currently experiencing a skin infection that requires treatment, or is currently being treated, with topical or systemic antibiotics.
Have any serious illness that is anticipated to require the use of systemic corticosteroids or otherwise interfere with study participation or require active frequent monitoring (e.g., unstable chronic asthma).
Have been treated with the following therapies:
Have high blood pressure characterized by a repeated systolic blood pressure >160 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) or diastolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg.
Have had major surgery within the past eight weeks or are planning major surgery during the study.
Have experienced any of the following within 12 weeks of screening: venous thromboembolic event (VTE), myocardial infarction (MI), unstable ischemic heart disease, stroke, or New York Heart Association Stage III/IV heart failure.
Have a history of recurrent (≥2) VTE or are considered at high risk of VTE as deemed by the investigator.
Have a history or presence of cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic, chronic liver disease gastrointestinal, endocrine, hematological, neurological, lymphoproliferative disease or neuropsychiatric disorders or any other serious and/or unstable illness.
Have a current or recent clinically serious viral, bacterial, fungal, or parasitic infection including herpes zoster, tuberculosis.
Have specific laboratory abnormalities.
Have received certain treatments that are contraindicated.
Pregnant or breastfeeding.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Call 1-877-CTLILLY (1-877-285-4559) or 1-317-615-4559 Mon - Fri 9 AM - 5 PM Eastern time (UTC/GMT - 5 hours, EST) | Eli Lilly and Company | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centro de Investigaciones Metabólicas (CINME) - Comite | Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires | C1056ABJ | Argentina | |||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36749121 | Derived | Wollenberg A, Kircik L, Simpson E, Brinker D, Katoh N, Rueda MJ, Issa M, Yang F, Feely M, Alexis A. Pooled Analysis of Baricitinib Tolerability in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis in Relation to Acne, Headache, and Gastrointestinal Events From 8 Clinical Trials. Dermatitis. 2023 Jul-Aug;34(4):308-314. doi: 10.1089/derm.2022.0027. Epub 2023 Feb 6. | |
| 36255569 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| A Study of Baricitinib (LY3009104) in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis | View source |
Not provided
Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.
Data are available 6 months after the primary publication and approval of the indication studied in the US and EU, whichever is later. Data will be indefinitely available for requesting.
A research proposal must be approved by an independent review panel and researchers must sign a data sharing agreement.
Not provided
Participants who completed the 16-week treatment period had an option to enter extension study JAHN (NCT03334435).
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Placebo administered orally once daily. |
| FG001 | 2 mg Baricitinib | 2 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Dec 18, 2018 | Apr 27, 2020 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Topical corticosteroid | Drug | Administered as standard-of-care. |
|
| Placebo | Drug | Administered orally. |
|
| Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI90 | The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI90 is defined as a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the EASI score. | Week 16 |
| Percent Change From Baseline on EASI Score | The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). Least Squares Mean (LSM) were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline score and baseline score-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous effects. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD75) | The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3)oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with a visual analogue scales (VAS) where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. The SCORAD75 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score. | Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving a 4-Point Improvement in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | The Itch NRS is a patient-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. | Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in the Score of Item 2 of the Atopic Dermatitis Sleep Scale (ADSS) | The ADSS is a 3-item, participant-administered questionnaire developed to assess the impact of itch on sleep including difficulty falling asleep due to itch, frequency of waking due to itch, and difficulty getting back to sleep last night due to itch. Item 2 frequency of waking last night is reported by selecting the number of times they woke up each night, ranging from 0 to 29 times, where the higher a number indicates a worse outcome. The ADSS is designed to be completed daily, using a daily diary, with respondents thinking about sleep "last night." Each item is scored individually. LS Mean were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline score and baseline score-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous effects. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS | Skin Pain NRS is a patient-administered,11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "worst pain imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's skin pain is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of skin pain in the past 24 hours. LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by- visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI50 | The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI50 is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement from baseline in the EASI score. | Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0 | The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. | Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in SCORAD | The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by- visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD90 | The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3)oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease: (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. The SCORAD90 is defined as a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score. | Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected | The BSA affected by AD will be assessed for 4 separate body regions and is collected as part of the EASI assessment: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region will be assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. The overall total percentage will be reported based off of all 4 body regions combined, after applying specific multipliers to the different body regions to account for the percent of the total BSA represented by each of the 4 regions. Use the percentage of skin affected for each region (0 to 100%) in EASI as follows: BSA Total = 0.1*BSAhead and neck + 0.3*BSAtrunk + 0.2* BSAupper limbs + 0.4*BSAlower limbs. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants Developing Skin Infections Requiring Antibiotic Treatment | Percentage of participants developing skin infections requiring antibiotic treatment. | Week 16 |
| Mean Gram Quantity of Moderate Potency Background Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) Used (Tube Weights) | Average weights of full tubes were used to determine the dispensed weights for each region. Returned tubes were weighed with cap without carton to determine the amount of TCS in grams (g) used at each visit. Analysis was done via analysis of variance (ANOVA), with geographic region, baseline disease severity (IGA) and treatment as factors in the model. | Week 0 through Week 16 |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Itch NRS | The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity, visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) | The POEM is a 7-item self-assessment questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) on a scale ranging from 0-4 (0 = no days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days, 4 = everyday). The sum of the 7 items gives the total POEM score of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). High scores are indicative of more severe disease and poor quality of life. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Severity-Atopic Dermatitis (PGI-S-AD) Score | The PGI-S-AD is a single-item question asking the participant how they would rate their overall AD symptoms over the past 24 hours, using a daily diary. The 5 categories of responses are "(0) no symptoms", "(1) very mild", "(2) mild" "(3) moderate", and "(4) severe." LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline on the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) | The HADS is a participant-rated instrument used to assess both anxiety and depression. This instrument consists of 14 item questionnaire, each item is rated on a 4-point scale, giving maximum scores of 21 for anxiety and depression. Scores of 11 or more on either subscale are considered to be a significant 'case' of psychological morbidity, while scores of 8-10 represent 'borderline' and 0-7, 'normal.' LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) | The DLQI is a simple, participant-administered,10 question, validated, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. The recall period of this scale is over the last "week." Response categories include "not at all," "a lot," and "very much," with corresponding scores of 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and at unanswered ("not relevant") responses scored as "0." Scores range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment), and a 4-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Atopic Dermatitis (WPAI-AD) Questionnaire | The WPAI-AD participant questionnaire was developed to measure the effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities in the 7 days prior to the visit. The WPAI-AD consists of 6 items grouped in 4 domains: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and activity impairment, that range from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating greater impairment. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score United States and United Kingdom Algorithm | The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The first part is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United Kingdom (UK) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.594 to 1, and the United States (US) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.109 to 1, with higher score indicating better health state. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Change From Baseline on the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The second part is assessed using a VAS that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | Baseline, Week 16 |
| Mean Number of Days Without Use of Background TCS | The ANCOVA model includes treatment, region, and baseline disease severity (IGA) as factors. | Week 0 through Week 16 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0 or 1 With a ≥ 2 Point Improvement | The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. | Week 4 |
| Fundacion CIDEA |
| Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires |
| C1121ABE |
| Argentina |
| Instituto de Neumonología y Dermatología | Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires | C1425BEA | Argentina |
| Psoriahue Medicina Interdisciplinaria | Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires | C1425DKG | Argentina |
| Parra Dermatología | Mendoza | 5500 | Argentina |
| Woden Dermatology | Phillip | Australian Capital Territory | 2606 | Australia |
| Skin & Cancer Foundation Australia | Westmead | New South Wales | 2145 | Australia |
| The Skin Centre | Benowa | Queensland | 4217 | Australia |
| Veracity Clinical Research Pty Ltd | Woolloongabba | Queensland | 4102 | Australia |
| Clinical Trials SA Pty Ltd | Adelaide | South Australia | 5073 | Australia |
| Skin and Cancer Foundation Inc. | Melbourne | Victoria | 3053 | Australia |
| Fremantle Dermatology | Perth | Western Australia | 6160 | Australia |
| Universitätsklinikum Graz | Graz | Styria | 8036 | Austria |
| Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg | Heidelberg | Baden-Wurttemberg | 69120 | Germany |
| Klinikum der Universität München | München | Bavaria | 80337 | Germany |
| Rosenpark Research Geschäftsbereich der Rosenparkklinik GmbH | Darmstadt | Hesse | 64283 | Germany |
| Dermatologisches Zentrum Osnabrück Nord | Bramsche | Lower Saxony | 49565 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Aachen - UKA | Aachen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 52074 | Germany |
| Universitaetsklinikum Essen | Essen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 45147 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Münster | Münster | North Rhine-Westphalia | 48149 | Germany |
| Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein | Lübeck | Schleswig-Holstein | 23538 | Germany |
| Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin | Berlin | 10117 | Germany |
| TFS Trial Form Support GmbH | Hamburg | 20537 | Germany |
| Policlinico Univ. Agostino Gemelli | Rome | Lazio | 00168 | Italy |
| Istituto Clinico Humanitas | Rozzano | Milano | 20089 | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedale San Martino di Genova | Genova | 16132 | Italy |
| Azienda Ospedaliera - Universitaria Pisana | Pisa | 56126 | Italy |
| ULSS 8 UOC Dermatologia Viale Rodolfi, 37 | Vicenza | 36100 | Italy |
| Kawashima Dermatology Clinic | Ichikawa-shi | Chiba | 272-0033 | Japan |
| Medical Corporation Soleil Miyata Dermatology Clinic | Matsudo-shi | Chiba | 271-0092 | Japan |
| Yamano Dermatological Clinic | Dazaifu | Fukuoka | 818-0104 | Japan |
| Tashiro Dermatological Clinic | Iizuka | Fukuoka | 820-0040 | Japan |
| Shibaki Dermatology Clinic | Sapporo | Hokkaido | 006 0022 | Japan |
| Sapporo Skin Clinic | Sapporo | Hokkaido | 060-0063 | Japan |
| Queen's Square Dermatology and Allergology | Nishi-ku, Yokohama-city | Kanagawa | 220-6208 | Japan |
| Yoshioka Dermatology Clinic | Neyagawa | Osaka | 572-0838 | Japan |
| Senri-Chuo Hanafusa Dermatology Clinic | Toyonaka-shi | Osaka | 560-0085 | Japan |
| JA Shizuoka Kohseiren Enshu Hospital | Hamamatsu | Shizuoka | 430-0929 | Japan |
| Iidabashi Clinic | Chiyoda-ku | Tokyo | 102-0072 | Japan |
| Tokyo Teishin Hospital | Chiyoda-Ku | Tokyo | 102-8798 | Japan |
| Hosono Clinic | Chuo-ku | Tokyo | 104-0031 | Japan |
| Oizumi Hanawa Clinic | Nerima-ku | Tokyo | 178-0063 | Japan |
| Yamate Dermatological Clinic | Shinjuku | Tokyo | 169-0075 | Japan |
| Tachikawa Dermatology Clinic | Tachikawa-shi | Tokyo | 190-0023 | Japan |
| Shirasaki Clinic | Takaoka-shi | Toyama | 9330871 | Japan |
| Dermed Centrum Medyczne Sp. z o.o. | Lodz | 90-265 | Poland |
| Lubelskie Centrum Diagnostyczne | Świdnik | 21-040 | Poland |
| Centrum Medyczne AMED | Warsaw | 01-518 | Poland |
| Centrum Medyczne Evimed | Warsaw | 02-625 | Poland |
| Korea University Ansan Hospital | Ansan-si | Gyeonggi-do | 15355 | South Korea |
| Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital | Goyang-si | Gyeonggi-do | 10326 | South Korea |
| Gachon University Gil Medical Center | Incheon | Korea | 21565 | South Korea |
| Severance Hospital Yonsei University Health System | Seoul | 03722 | South Korea |
| Konkuk University Hospital | Seoul | 05030 | South Korea |
| Seoul St. Mary's Hospital | Seoul | 06591 | South Korea |
| Chungang University Hospital | Seoul | 06973 | South Korea |
| Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital | Seoul | 07441 | South Korea |
| Hospital del Mar | Barcelona | 08003 | Spain |
| Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau | Barcelona | 08041 | Spain |
| Hospital Reina Sofia | Córdoba | 14004 | Spain |
| Hospital De Gran Canaria Dr. Negrin | Las Palmas de Gran Canaria | 35010 | Spain |
| Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal | Madrid | 28034 | Spain |
| Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Kaohsiung | Kaohsiung City | 83301 | Taiwan |
| Taipei Medical University- Shuang Ho Hospital | New Taipei City | 23561 | Taiwan |
| Chung Shan Medical University Hospital | Taichung | 40201 | Taiwan |
| National Taiwan University Hospital | Taipei | 10048 | Taiwan |
| Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Taipei | Taipei | 10508 | Taiwan |
| Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Linkou | Taoyuan, (r.o.c.) | 333 | Taiwan |
| Katoh N, Takita Y, Isaka Y, Nishikawa A, Torisu-Itakura H, Saeki H. Pooled Safety Analysis of Baricitinib in Adult Participants with Atopic Dermatitis in the Japanese Subpopulation from Six Randomized Clinical Trials. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Dec;12(12):2765-2779. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00828-5. Epub 2022 Oct 18. |
| 34275122 | Derived | Thyssen JP, Buhl T, Fernandez-Penas P, Kabashima K, Chen S, Lu N, DeLozier AM, Casillas M, Stander S. Baricitinib Rapidly Improves Skin Pain Resulting in Improved Quality of Life for Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: Analyses from BREEZE-AD1, 2, and 7. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Oct;11(5):1599-1611. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00577-x. Epub 2021 Jul 18. |
| 33899152 | Derived | Buhl T, Rosmarin D, Serra-Baldrich E, Fernandez-Penas P, Igarashi A, Konstantinou MP, Chen S, Lu N, Pierce E, Casillas M. Itch and Sleep Improvements with Baricitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of 3 Phase 3 Studies. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Jun;11(3):971-982. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00534-8. Epub 2021 Apr 25. |
| 33826132 | Derived | King B, Maari C, Lain E, Silverberg JI, Issa M, Holzwarth K, Brinker D, Cardillo T, Nunes FP, Simpson EL. Extended Safety Analysis of Baricitinib 2 mg in Adult Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: An Integrated Analysis from Eight Randomized Clinical Trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021 May;22(3):395-405. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00602-x. Epub 2021 Apr 7. |
| 33001140 | Derived | Reich K, Kabashima K, Peris K, Silverberg JI, Eichenfield LF, Bieber T, Kaszuba A, Kolodsick J, Yang FE, Gamalo M, Brinker DR, DeLozier AM, Janes JM, Nunes FP, Thyssen JP, Simpson EL. Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib Combined With Topical Corticosteroids for Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Dec 1;156(12):1333-1343. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.3260. |
| FG002 | 4 mg Baricitinib | 4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. |
| Received One Dose of Study Drug |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
All randomized participants.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Placebo administered orally once daily. |
| BG001 | 2 mg Baricitinib | 2 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. |
| BG002 | 4 mg Baricitinib | 4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
| |||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 With a ≥ 2 Point Improvement | The IGA measures investigators global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their atopic dermatitis (AD), based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. | All randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) | The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI75 is defined as a ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score. | All randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI90 | The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI90 is defined as a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the EASI score. | All randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline on EASI Score | The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). Least Squares Mean (LSM) were calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline score and baseline score-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous effects. | All randomized participants who had Week 16 EASI data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percent change | Baseline, Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORing Atopic Dermatitis 75 (SCORAD75) | The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3)oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with a visual analogue scales (VAS) where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. The SCORAD75 responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score. | All randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving a 4-Point Improvement in Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) | The Itch NRS is a patient-administered, 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. | All randomized participants with Baseline Itch Score >= 4. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Score of Item 2 of the Atopic Dermatitis Sleep Scale (ADSS) | The ADSS is a 3-item, participant-administered questionnaire developed to assess the impact of itch on sleep including difficulty falling asleep due to itch, frequency of waking due to itch, and difficulty getting back to sleep last night due to itch. Item 2 frequency of waking last night is reported by selecting the number of times they woke up each night, ranging from 0 to 29 times, where the higher a number indicates a worse outcome. The ADSS is designed to be completed daily, using a daily diary, with respondents thinking about sleep "last night." Each item is scored individually. LS Mean were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline score and baseline score-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous effects. | All randomized participants with Week 16 ADSS Item 2 (frequency of waking) data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Skin Pain NRS | Skin Pain NRS is a patient-administered,11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "worst pain imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's skin pain is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of skin pain in the past 24 hours. LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by- visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | All randomized participants with Week 16 Skin Pain NRS data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI50 | The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe). The EASI50 is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement from baseline in the EASI score. | All randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0 | The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. | All randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in SCORAD | The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. LS Means were calculated using a MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by- visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | All randomized participants with Week 16 SCORAD data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving SCORAD90 | The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3)oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease: (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), & subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease. The SCORAD90 is defined as a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the SCORAD score. | All randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area (BSA) Affected | The BSA affected by AD will be assessed for 4 separate body regions and is collected as part of the EASI assessment: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region will be assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. The overall total percentage will be reported based off of all 4 body regions combined, after applying specific multipliers to the different body regions to account for the percent of the total BSA represented by each of the 4 regions. Use the percentage of skin affected for each region (0 to 100%) in EASI as follows: BSA Total = 0.1*BSAhead and neck + 0.3*BSAtrunk + 0.2* BSAupper limbs + 0.4*BSAlower limbs. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | All randomized participants with Week 16 BSA data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Developing Skin Infections Requiring Antibiotic Treatment | Percentage of participants developing skin infections requiring antibiotic treatment. | All randomized participants who receive at least 1 dose of study drug. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 16 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Gram Quantity of Moderate Potency Background Topical Corticosteroid (TCS) Used (Tube Weights) | Average weights of full tubes were used to determine the dispensed weights for each region. Returned tubes were weighed with cap without carton to determine the amount of TCS in grams (g) used at each visit. Analysis was done via analysis of variance (ANOVA), with geographic region, baseline disease severity (IGA) and treatment as factors in the model. | All randomized participants. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | grams | Week 0 through Week 16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Itch NRS | The Itch NRS is a participant-administered, 11-point horizontal scale, with 0 representing "no itch" and 10 representing "worst itch imaginable." Overall severity of a participant's itching is indicated by selecting the number, using a daily diary, that best describes the worst level of itching in the past 24 hours. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity, visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | All randomized participants with Week 16 Itch NRS data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percent change | Baseline, Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) | The POEM is a 7-item self-assessment questionnaire that assesses disease symptoms (dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping) on a scale ranging from 0-4 (0 = no days, 1 = 1-2 days, 2 = 3-4 days, 3 = 5-6 days, 4 = everyday). The sum of the 7 items gives the total POEM score of 0 (absent disease) to 28 (severe disease). High scores are indicative of more severe disease and poor quality of life. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | All randomized participants with Week 16 POEM data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Patient Global Impression of Severity-Atopic Dermatitis (PGI-S-AD) Score | The PGI-S-AD is a single-item question asking the participant how they would rate their overall AD symptoms over the past 24 hours, using a daily diary. The 5 categories of responses are "(0) no symptoms", "(1) very mild", "(2) mild" "(3) moderate", and "(4) severe." LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | All randomized participants with Week 16 PGI-S-AD. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) | The HADS is a participant-rated instrument used to assess both anxiety and depression. This instrument consists of 14 item questionnaire, each item is rated on a 4-point scale, giving maximum scores of 21 for anxiety and depression. Scores of 11 or more on either subscale are considered to be a significant 'case' of psychological morbidity, while scores of 8-10 represent 'borderline' and 0-7, 'normal.' LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | All randomized participants Week 16 HADS data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) | The DLQI is a simple, participant-administered,10 question, validated, quality-of-life questionnaire that covers 6 domains including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. The recall period of this scale is over the last "week." Response categories include "not at all," "a lot," and "very much," with corresponding scores of 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and at unanswered ("not relevant") responses scored as "0." Scores range from 0 to 30 (less to more impairment), and a 4-point change from baseline is considered as the minimal clinically important difference threshold. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | All randomized participants with Week 16 DLQI data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment - Atopic Dermatitis (WPAI-AD) Questionnaire | The WPAI-AD participant questionnaire was developed to measure the effect of general health and symptom severity on work productivity and regular activities in the 7 days prior to the visit. The WPAI-AD consists of 6 items grouped in 4 domains: absenteeism (work time missed), presenteeism (impairment at work/reduced on-the-job effectiveness), work productivity loss (overall work impairment/absenteeism plus presenteeism), and activity impairment, that range from 0% to 100%, with higher values indicating greater impairment. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | All randomized participants with Week 16 WPAI-AD data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Index Score United States and United Kingdom Algorithm | The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The first part is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United Kingdom (UK) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.594 to 1, and the United States (US) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.109 to 1, with higher score indicating better health state. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | All randomized participants with Week 16 EQ-5D-5L Health State Index US and UK data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | units on a scale | Baseline, Week 16 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline on the EQ-5D-5L Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The second part is assessed using a VAS that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine. LS Means were calculated using MMRM model with treatment, region, baseline disease severity (IGA), visit, and treatment-by-visit-interaction as fixed categorical effects and baseline and baseline-by-visit-interaction as fixed continuous effects. | All randomized participants with Week 16 EQ-5D-5L VAS data. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | millimeters | Baseline, Week 16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Number of Days Without Use of Background TCS | The ANCOVA model includes treatment, region, and baseline disease severity (IGA) as factors. | All randomized participants. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | days | Week 0 through Week 16 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving IGA of 0 or 1 With a ≥ 2 Point Improvement | The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification. | All randomized participants. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Week 4 |
|
|
Baseline up to 20 weeks
All randomized participants who received at least one dose of study drug.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Placebo administered orally once daily. | 0 | 108 | 4 | 108 | 15 | 108 |
| EG001 | 2 mg Baricitinib | 2 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. | 0 | 109 | 2 | 109 | 24 | 109 |
| EG002 | 4 mg Baricitinib | 4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. | 0 | 111 | 4 | 111 | 26 | 111 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cataract | Eye disorders | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eye infection toxoplasmal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Postoperative abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin laceration | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intervertebral disc protrusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermatitis atopic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Folliculitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chief Medical Officer | Eli Lilly and Company | 800-545-5979 | ClinicalTrials.gov@lilly.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 12, 2019 | Apr 27, 2020 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003876 | Dermatitis, Atopic |
| D004485 | Eczema |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012873 | Skin Diseases, Genetic |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D003872 | Dermatitis |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017443 | Skin Diseases, Eczematous |
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C000596027 | baricitinib |
| D000305 | Adrenal Cortex Hormones |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006728 | Hormones |
| D006730 | Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists |
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Multiple |
|
| White |
|
| South Korea |
|
| Austria |
|
| Japan |
|
| Taiwan |
|
| Poland |
|
| Italy |
|
| Australia |
|
| Germany |
|
| Spain |
|
| Odds Ratio (OR) |
| 2.77 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 1.38 |
| 5.56 |
| Superiority |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. |
|
|
|
4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily.
|
|
|
|
|
4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 mg Baricitinib |
4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. |
|
|
|
4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily.
|
|
|
4 mg Baricitinib administered orally once daily. |
|
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|